Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of outcomes between males and females after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Few studies have specifically addressed the potential differences in outcome from ACL reconstruction between males and females. The present study compared patient-reported outcomes between the sexes after a minimum of 2 years following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. Patients were also categorized as acute or chronic based on the time from injury to surgery. Outcome questionnaires were mailed to 638 patients, resulting in 151 eligible respondents included in the analysis. The outcome instruments used were the Cincinnati scale, the ACL-Quality of Life scale, and the Tegner activity rating scale. At an average of 5 years following ACL reconstruction no differences were found between males (n=74) and females (n=77) on the ACL-QOL scale. Females perceived a significantly higher activity level prior to surgery according to the Tegner scale. However, no other differences were identified by gender or stage based on prior, highest, or current Tegner activity levels. Results of the Cincinnati scale for the entire sample showed that females scored an average of 5.7 points lower than males. Analysis of this difference by patient age indicates a trend toward lower scores in females between 12–18 and over 24 years old. Chronicity was not a factor that affected outcome in either males or females. No differences were found in the number of patients who complained of anterior knee pain. We conclude that autogenous bone–patella tendon–bone ACL reconstruction is equally successful in well-matched populations of males and females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a,b.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, D'Andria S, et al (1993) Patellofemoral problems after intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop 288:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arendt E, Dick R (1995) Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer. NCAA data and review of literature. Am J Sports Med 23:694–701

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bach BR, Jones GT, Sweet FA, et al (1994) Arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon substitution. Two- to four-year follow-up results. Am J Sports Med 22:758–767

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, Andrews M (1997) A rigorous comparison between the sexes of results and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 25:514–526

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buss D, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, et al (1993) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1346–1355

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New York, pp 19–74

  7. Cosgarea AJ, Sebastianelli WJ, Dettaven KE (1995) Prevention of arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the central third patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 23 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrari JD, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Wang T, Bojchuk J (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: an outcome analysis comparing gender. Arthroscopy 17:588–596

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray J, Taunton JE, McKenzie DC, et al (1985) A survey of injuries to the cruciate ligament of the knee in female basketball players. Int J Sports Med 6:314–316

    Google Scholar 

  10. Griffith L, Agel J, Albohm MJ, et al (2000) Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:41–150

    Google Scholar 

  11. Höher J, Bach T, Munster A, et al (1997) Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Self-administration versus interview. Am J Sports Med 25:642–647

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hrubesch R, Rangger C, Reichkendeler M, et al (2000) Comparison of score evaluations and instrumented measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:850–856

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsson J, Kartus J, Magnusson L, Larsson J, Brandsson S, Eriksson B (1999) Subacute versus delayed reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the competitive athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keene GC, Bieckerstaff D, Rae PJ, Paterson RS (1993) The natural history of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 21:672–679

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kleipool AE, van Loon T, Marti RK (1994) Pain after use of the central third of the patellar tendon for cruciate ligament reconstruction. 33 patients followed 2–3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 65:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malone TR, Hardaker WT, Garrett WE, et al (1993) Relationship of gender to anterior cruciate ligament injuries in intercollegiate basketball players. J South Orthop Assoc 2:36–39

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohtadi N (1998) Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 26:350–359

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murrell GAC, Maddali S, Horovitz L, et al (2001) The effects of time course after anterior cruciate ligament injury in correlation with meniscal and cartilage loss. Am J Sports Med 29:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Noojin FK, Barret GR, Hartzog CW, et al (2000) Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women. Am J Sports Med 28:783–789

    Google Scholar 

  20. Noyes F, McGinniss GH, Mooar LA (1984) Functional disability in the anterior cruciate insufficient knee syndrome. Review of knee rating systems and projected risk factors in determining treatment. Sports Med 1:278–302

    Google Scholar 

  21. Noyes F, Barber-Westin S (1997) A comparison of results in acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament ruptures of arthroscopically assisted autogenous patellar tendon reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 25:460–471

    Google Scholar 

  22. Otto D, Pinczewski LA, Clingeleffer A, et al (1998) Five-year results of single-incision arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 26:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sgaglione NA, Del Pizzo W, Fox JM, et al (1995) Critical analysis of knee ligament rating systems. Am J Sports Med 23:660–667

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Robert T. Grant M.D. and Yvonne E. Satterwhite M.D. for inclusion of their patients as study participants. Jesse Pace is acknowledged for assistance with data collection. Additionally, Thomas A. Adler Ph.D. is acknowledged for his efforts in database configuration for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Willson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ott, S.M., Ireland, M.L., Ballantyne, B.T. et al. Comparison of outcomes between males and females after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11, 75–80 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0348-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0348-9

Keywords

Navigation