Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Critically ill patients, among whom acute kidney injury is common, are often considered particularly vulnerable to iodinated contrast medium nephrotoxicity. However, the attributable incidence remains uncertain given the paucity of observational studies including a control group. This study assessed acute kidney injury incidence attributable to iodinated contrast media in critically ill patients based on new data accounting for sample and effect size and including a control group.

Methods

Systematic review of studies measuring incidence of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients following contrast medium exposure compared to matched unexposed patients. Patient-level meta-analysis implementing a Bayesian nested mixed effects multiple logistic regression model.

Results

Ten studies were identified; only four took into account the baseline acute kidney injury risk, three by patient matching (560 patients). Objective meta-analysis of these three studies (vague and impartial a priori hypothesis concerning attributable acute kidney injury risk) did not find that iodinated contrast media increased the incidence of acute kidney injury (odds ratio 0.95, 95% highest posterior density interval 0.45–1.62). Bayesian analysis demonstrated that, to conclude in favor of a statistically significant incidence of acute kidney injury attributable to contrast media despite this observed lack of association, one’s a priori belief would have to be very strongly biased, assigning to previous uncontrolled reports 3–12 times the weight of evidence strength provided by the matched studies including a control group.

Conclusions

Meta-analysis of matched cohort studies of iodinated contrast medium exposure does not support a significant incidence of acute kidney injury attributable to iodinated contrast media in critically ill patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group (2012) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2:S1–S138. doi:10.1038/kisup.2012.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brochard L, Abroug F, Brenner M, Broccard AF, Danner RL, Ferrer M, Laghi F, Magder S, Papazian L, Pelosi P, Polderman KH, ATS, ERS, ESICM, SCCM, SRLF Ad Hoc Committee on Acute Renal Failure (2010) An Official ATS/ERS/ESICM/SCCM/SRLF statement: prevention and management of acute renal failure in the ICU patient: an international consensus conference in intensive care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181:1128–1155. doi:10.1164/rccm.200711-1664ST

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lautin EM, Freeman NJ, Schoenfeld AH, Bakal CW, Haramati N, Friedman AC, Lautin JL, Braha S, Kadish EG, Sprayregen S (1991) Radiocontrast-associated renal dysfunction: incidence and risk factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:49–58. doi:10.2214/ajr.157.1.2048539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G (2004) A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1393–1399. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.068

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown JR, DeVries JT, Piper WD, Robb JF, Hearne MJ, Ver Lee PM, Kellet MA, Watkins MW, Ryan TJ, Silver MT, Ross CS, MacKenzie TA, O’Connor GT, Malenka DJ, Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group (2008) Serious renal dysfunction after percutaneous coronary interventions can be predicted. Am Heart J 155:260–266. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Comin J, Williamson EE, Katzberg RW, Murad MH, Kallmes DF (2013) Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast medium administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 267:119–128. doi:10.1148/radiol.12121460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Carter RE, Katzberg RW, Kallmes DF, Williamson EE (2014) Risk of intravenous contrast material-mediated acute kidney injury: a propensity score-matched study stratified by baseline-estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 271:65–73. doi:10.1148/radiol.13130775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Carter RE, Hartman RP, Katzberg RW, Kallmes DF, Williamson EE (2014) Intravenous contrast material exposure is not an independent risk factor for dialysis or mortality. Radiology 273:714–725. doi:10.1148/radiol.14132418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rashid AH, Brieva JL, Stokes B (2009) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in intensive care patients undergoing computerized tomography and prevalence of risk factors. Anaesth Intensive Care 37:968–975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoste EA, Doom S, De Waele J, Delrue LJ, Defreyne L, Benoit DD, Decruyenaere J (2011) Epidemiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Med 37:1921–1931. doi:10.1007/s00134-011-2389-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Chaari A, Laissy JP, Régnier B, Wolff M, Pajot O (2011) Acute Kidney Injury Network definition of contrast-induced nephropathy in the critically ill: incidence and outcome. J Crit Care 26:593–599. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Persson PB, Hansell P, Liss P (2005) Pathophysiology of contrast medium-induced nephropathy. Kidney Int 68:14–22. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5001887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Andreucci M, Solomon R, Tasanarong A (2014) Side effects of radiographic contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention. Biomed Res Int 214:741018. doi:10.1155/2014/741018

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandes SM, Martins DM, da Fonseca CD, Watanabe M, de Vattimo MF (2016) Impact of iodinated contrast on renal function and hemodynamics in rats with chronic hyperglycemia and chronic kidney disease. Biomed Res Int 2016:3019410. doi:10.1155/2016/3019410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rouse RL, Stewart SR, Thompson KL, Zhang J (2013) Kidney injury biomarkers in hypertensive, diabetic, and nephropathy rat models treated with contrast media. Toxicol Pathol 41:662–680. doi:10.1177/0192623312464122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heyman SN, Rosen S, Rosenberger C (2008) Renal parenchymal hypoxia, hypoxia adaptation, and the pathogenesis of radiocontrast nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:288–296. doi:10.2215/CJN.02600607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vandenberghe W, De Corte W, Hoste EA (2014) Contrast-associated AKI in the critically ill: relevant or irrelevant? Curr Opin Crit Care 20:596–605. doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, Tierney JF, PRISMA-IPD Development Group (2015) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. The PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA 313:1657–1665. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P (2007) Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 7:16. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ (2003) Semiparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Hobbs BP, Thall PF, Lin SH (2016) Bayesian Group sequential clinical trial design using total toxicity burden and progression-free survival. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 65:273–297. doi:10.1111/rssc.12117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP (2003) Evidence synthesis. In: Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP (eds) Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. Wiley, Chichester, pp 267–299

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Morita S, Thall PF, Müller P (2008) Determining the effective sample size of a parametric prior. Biometrics 64:595–602. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00888.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huber W, Jeschke B, Page M, Weiss W, Salmhofer H, Schweigart U, Ilgmann K, Reichenberger J, Neu B, Classen M (2001) Reduced incidence of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy in ICU patients under theophylline prophylaxis: a prospective comparison to series of patients at similar risk. Intensive Care Med 27:1200–1209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haveman JW, Gansevoort RT, Bongaerts AH, Nijsten MW (2006) Low incidence of nephropathy in surgical ICU patients receiving intravenous contrast: a retrospective analysis. Intensive Care Med 32:1199–1205. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0198-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Polena S, Yang S, Alam R, Gricius J, Gupta JR, Badalova N, Chuang P, Gintautas J, Conetta R (2005) Nephropathy in critically ill patients without preexisting renal disease. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 48:134–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tremblay LN, Tien H, Hamilton P, Brenneman FD, Rizoli SB, Sharkey PW, Chu P, Rozycki GS (2005) Risk and benefit of intravenous contrast in trauma patients with an elevated serum creatinine. J Trauma 59:1162–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oleinik A, Romero JM, Schwab K, Lev MH, Jhawar N, Delgado Almandoz JE, Smith EE, Greenberg SM, Rosand J, Goldstein JN (2009) CT angiography for intracerebral hemorrhage does not increase risk of acute nephropathy. Stroke 40:2393–2397. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.546127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. McGillicuddy EA, Schuster KM, Kaplan LJ, Maung AA, Lui FY, Maerz LL, Johnson DC, Davis KA (2010) Contrast-induced nephropathy in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma 68:294–297. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cf7e40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ng CS, Shaw AD, Bell CS, Samuels JA (2010) Effect of IV contrast medium on renal function in oncologic patients undergoing CT in ICU. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:414–422. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.4150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cely CM, Schein RM, Quartin AA (2012) Risk of contrast induced nephropathy in the critically ill: a prospective, case matched study. Crit Care 16:R67. doi:10.1186/cc11317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim DY, Kobayashi L, Costantini TW, Chang D, Fortlage D, Curry T, Wynn S, Doucet J, Bansal V, Coimbra R (2012) Is contrast exposure safe among the highest risk trauma patients? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:61–66. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31823f36e0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ehrmann S, Badin J, Savath L, Pajot O, Garot D, Pham T, Capdevila X, Perrotin D, Lakhal K (2013) Acute kidney injury in the critically ill: is iodinated contrast medium really harmful? Crit Care Med 41:1017–1026. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318275871a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Christ M, Auenmüller KI, Amirie S, Brand M, Sasko BM, Trappe HJ (2016) Acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy in victims from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with administration of contrast agent. Herzschrittmarcherther Elektrophysiol 27:6–14. doi:10.1007/s00399-015-0410-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao J, Zhang M, Fang G, Ye L, Tang W (2005) Risk and harm of contrast induced nephropathy in critically ill patients. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 27:366–370. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.05.009

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wilhelm-Leen E, Montez-Rath ME, Chertow G (2016) Estimating the risk of radiocontrast-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 28. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016010021

  37. Subramaniam RM, Suarez-Cuervo C, Wilson RF, Turban S, Zhang A, Sherrod C, Aboagye J, Eng J, Choi MJ, Hutfless S, Bass EB (2016) Effectiveness of prevention strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 164:406–416. doi:10.7326/M15-1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eng J, Wilson RF, Subramaniam RM, Zhang A, Suarez-Cuervo C, Turban S, Choi MJ, Sherrod C, Hutfless S, Lyoha EE, Bass EB (2016) Comparative effect of contrast media type on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 164:417–424. doi:10.7326/M15-1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Salmon-Gandonnière C, Benz-de-Bretagne I, Mercier E, Joret A, Halimi JM, Ehrmann S, Barin-Le Guellec C (2016) Iohexol clearance in unstable critically ill patients: a tool to assess glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem Lab Med 54:1777–1786. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bihorac A, Chawla LS, Shaw AD, Al-Khafaji A, Davison DL, Demuth GE, Gitzgerald R, Gong MN, Graham DD, Gunnerson K, Heung M, Jortani S, Kleerup E, Koyner JL, Krell K, Letourneau J, Lissauer M, Miner J, Nguyen HB, Ortega LM, Self WH, Sellman R, Shi J, Straseski J, Szalados JE, Wilber ST, Walker MG, Wilson J, Wunderink R, Zimmerman J, Kellum JA (2014) Validation of cell-cycle arrest biomarkers for acute kidney injury using clinical adjudication. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189:932–999. doi:10.1164/rccm.201401-0077OC

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the following grant support: Cancer Center Support Grant and National Institute for health/National Cancer Institute grant P30CA016672.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Ehrmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Take-home message: This Bayesian meta-analysis of matched cohort studies of iodinated contrast medium exposure does not support a significant association with acute kidney injury incidence in critically ill patients. The continued belief that critically ill patients are particularly vulnerable to iodinated contrast medium nephrotoxicity rests on heavily weighting evidence from studies without a control group.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 378 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehrmann, S., Quartin, A., Hobbs, B.P. et al. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 43, 785–794 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4700-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4700-9

Keywords

Navigation