Skip to main content
Log in

Differenzialdiagnose dissoziativer Anfälle

Differential diagnosis of dissociative seizures

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Anamnese und Semiologie geben oft wegweisende Hinweise auf das Vorliegen dissoziativer Anfälle. Offenheit und Wachsamkeit des behandelnden Arztes, an dissoziative Anfälle frühzeitig zu denken, sind essenziell. Eine Video-Elektroenzephalographie-basierte Analyse der Ereignisse ist in der Regel entscheidend zur korrekten Diagnosestellung, insbesondere bei komplexeren Fällen. Der Beziehungsgestaltung ist bereits im diagnostischen Prozess ein hoher Stellenwert zuzuordnen, um Patienten für eine psychotherapeutische Behandlung zu gewinnen. Psychische Komorbidität und weitere somatische Beschwerden müssen im Diagnoseprozess erfasst werden. Aktuelle Änderungen in den gängigen Diagnosemanualen, einschließlich der ICD-11, spiegeln das lebhafte Interesse und die kontroverse Diskussion um die lange bekannte Krankheitsentität wider.

Abstract

Patient history taking and semiology provide seminal clues to the diagnosis of dissociative seizures. Openness and alertness of the treating physician are essential. Video-electroencephalogram(EEG)-based analyses of the events are crucial to establish the correct diagnosis, particularly in complex cases. The patient-doctor relationship is of particular importance in order to successfully motivate the patient for psychotherapeutic treatment. Coexisting psychiatric morbidity as well as other functional somatic symptoms must be actively explored. Current changes in the established diagnostic manuals, including ICD-11, reflect the ongoing vivid interest and controversial discussions in the field of dissociative disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4. Aufl. American Psychiatric Association, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Task Force (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington VA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Ani C, Reading R, Lynn R et al (2013) Incidence and 12-month outcome of non-transient childhood conversion disorder in the U.K. and Ireland. Br J Psychiatry 202:413–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Avbersek A, Sisodiya S (2010) Does the primary literature provide support for clinical signs used to distinguish psychogenic nonepileptic seizures from epileptic seizures? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 81:719–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aybek S, Nicholson TRJ, Draganski B et al (2014) Grey matter changes in motor conversion disorder. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 85:236–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bischoff A, Schneider M, Denhaerynck K, Battegay E (2009) Health and ill health of asylum seekers in Switzerland: an epidemiological study. Eur J Public Health 19:59–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown RJ, Lewis-Fernández R (2011) Culture and conversion disorder: implications for DSM-5. Psychiatry 74:187–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown RJ, Reuber M (2016) Psychological and psychiatric aspects of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES): a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 45:157–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daum C, Aybek S (2013) Validity of the „Drift without pronation“ sign in conversion disorder. BMC Neurol 13:31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Daum C, Gheorghita F, Spatola M et al (2014) Interobserver agreement and validity of bedside „positive signs“ for functional weakness, sensory and gait disorders in conversion disorder: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 86:425–430. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-307381

  11. Fritzsche K, Baumann K, Götz-Trabert K, Schulze-Bonhage A (2013) Dissoziative Anfälle: Eine Herausforderung für Neurologenund Psychotherapeuten. Dtsch Arztebl 110:263–268

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fritzsche K, Baumann K, Schulze-Bonhage A (2013) Dissoziative Anfälle. Ein Manual für Neurologen zur Diagnosemitteilung. Nervenarzt 84:7–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hubschmid M, Aybek S, Maccaferri GE et al (2015) Efficacy of brief interdisciplinary psychotherapeutic intervention for motor conversion disorder and nonepileptic attacks. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 37:448–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapfhammer H‑P (2011) Somatoforme Störungen. In: Möller, Laux, Kapfhammer (Hrsg) Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik, Psychotherapie, 4. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  15. van der Kruijs SJM, Jagannathan SR, Bodde NMG et al (2014) Resting-state networks and dissociation in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. J Psychiatr Res 54:126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehn A, Gelauff J, Hoeritzauer I et al (2016) Functional neurological disorders: mechanisms and treatment. J Neurol 263:611–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicholson TR, Aybek S, Craig T et al (2016) Life events and escape in conversion disorder. Psychol Med 46:2617–2626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Brien FM, Fortune GM, Dicker P et al (2015) Psychiatric and neuropsychological profiles of people with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 43:39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pick S, Mellers JDC, Goldstein LH (2016) Emotion and dissociative seizures: a phenomenological analysis of patients’ perspectives. Epilepsy Behav 56:5–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pottie K, Greenaway C, Feightner J et al (2011) Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees. CMAJ 183:E824–925

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rawlings GH, Brown I, Reuber M (2017) Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 68:153–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rief W, Martin A (2014) How to use the new DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder diagnosis in research and practice: a critical evaluation and a proposal for modifications. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 10:339–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sawchuk T, Buchhalter J (2015) Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in children – psychological presentation, treatment, and short-term outcomes. Epilepsy Behav 52:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schaefert R, Hausteiner-Wiehle, Häuser W et al (2012) Nicht-spezifische, funktionelle und somatoforme Körperbeschwerden. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109:803–813

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Scheidt CE, Baumann K, Katzev M et al (2014) Differentiating cerebral ischemia from functional neurological symptom disorder: a psychosomatic perspective. BMC Psychiatry 14:158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmutz M (2013) Dissociative seizures – a critical review and perspective. Epilepsy Behav 29:449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schulze-Bonhage, Fritzsche K (2009) Koexistenz von Epilepsie und dissoziativen Anfällen. Z Epileptol 22:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone J, Carson A, Duncan R et al (2009) Symptoms „unexplained by organic disease“ in 1144 new neurology out-patients: how often does the diagnosis change at follow-up? Brain 132:2878–2888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO (2005) Internationale KLassifikation psychischer Störungen, ICD-10, 5. Huber, Bern Göttingen Toronto Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  30. Willment K, Hill M, Baslet G, Loring DW (2015) Cognitive impairment and evaluation in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: an integrated cognitive-emotional approach. Clin EEG Neurosci 46:42–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Joos.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Joos, K. Baumann, C. E. Scheidt, C. Lahmann, R. König, H.-J. Busch und A. Schulze-Bonhage geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joos, A., Baumann, K., Scheidt, C.E. et al. Differenzialdiagnose dissoziativer Anfälle. Nervenarzt 88, 1147–1152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-017-0401-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-017-0401-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation