Skip to main content
Log in

Intraspecific nestmate recognition in two parabiotic ant species: acquired recognition cues and low inter-colony discrimination

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parabiotic ants—ants that share their nest with another ant species—need to tolerate not only conspecific nestmates, but also nestmates of a foreign species. The parabiotic ants Camponotus rufifemur and Crematogaster modiglianii display high interspecific tolerance, which exceeds their respective partner colony and extends to alien colonies of the partner species. The tolerance appears to be related to unusual cuticular substances in both species. Both species possess hydrocarbons of unusually high chain lengths. In addition, Cr. modiglianii carries high quantities of hereto unknown compounds on its cuticle. These unusual features of the cuticular profiles may affect nestmate recognition within both respective species as well. In the present study, we therefore examined inter-colony discrimination within the two parabiotic species in relation to chemical differentiation. Cr. modiglianii was highly aggressive against workers from alien conspecific colonies in experimental confrontations. In spite of high inter-colony variation in the unknown compounds, however, Cr. modiglianii failed to differentiate between intracolonial and allocolonial unknown compounds. Instead, the cuticular hydrocarbons functioned as recognition cues despite low variation across colonies. Moreover, inter-colony aggression within Cr. modiglianii was significantly influenced by the presence of two methylbranched alkenes acquired from its Ca. rufifemur partner. Ca. rufifemur occurs in two varieties (‘red’ and ‘black’) with almost no overlap in their cuticular hydrocarbons. Workers of this species showed low aggression against conspecifics from foreign colonies of the same variety, but attacked workers from the respective other variety. The low inter-colony discrimination within a variety may be related to low chemical differentiation between the colonies. Ca. rufifemur majors elicited significantly more inter-colony aggression than medium-sized workers. This may be explained by the density of recognition cues: majors carried significantly higher quantities of cuticular hydrocarbons per body surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchinson J. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: Monographs in Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman and Hall, London. 416 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulay R., Hefetz A., Soroker V. and Lenoir A. 2000. Camponotus fellah colony integration: worker individuality necessitates frequent hydrocarbon exchanges. Anim. Behav. 59: 1127–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstaetter A.S., Endler A. and Kleineidam C.J. 2008. Nestmate recognition in ants is possible without tactile interaction. Naturwissenschaften 95: 601–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin N.F. and Hölldobler B. 1986. The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) I. Hierarchical cues in small colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errard C., Regla J.I. and Hefetz A. 2003. Interspecific recognition in Chilean parabiotic ant species. Insect. Soc. 50: 268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foitzik S., Sturm H., Pusch K., D’Ettorre P. and Heinze J. 2007. Nestmate recognition and intraspecific chemical and genetic variation in Temnothorax ants. Anim. Behav. 73: 999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs A. and Pomonis J.G. 1995. Physical properties of insect cuticular hydrocarbons: The effects of chain lengths, methyl branching and unsaturation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 112B: 243–249

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J., Foitzik S., Hippert A. and Hölldobler B. 1996. Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology 102: 510–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Springer, Berlin. 732 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway D.A., Lach L., Suarez A.V., Tsutsui N.D. and Case T.J. 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 181–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahav S., Soroker V. and Hefetz A. 1999. Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as ant recognition discriminators. Naturwissenschaften 86: 246–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambardi D., Dani F.R., Turillazzi S. and Boomsma J.J. 2007. Chemical mimicry in an incipient leaf-cutting ant social parasite. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 843–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A., Fresneau D., Errard C. and Hefetz A. 1999. Individuality and colonial identity in ants: the emergence of a social representation concept. In: Information Processing in Social Insects (Detrain C., Pasteels J.M. and Deneubourg J.L., Eds), Birkhäuser, Basel. pp 219–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang D. and Silverman J. 2000. “You are what you eat”: Diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Naturwissenschaften 87: 412–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z.B., Bagnères A.G. and Yamane S. 2001. Intra-colony, inter-colony and seasonal variations of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in Formica japonica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 48: 342–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel F., Blüthgen N. and Schmitt T. 2008a. Tropical parabiotic ants: Highly unusual cuticular substances and low interspecific discrimination. Front. Zool. 5: 16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel F., Linsenmair K.E. and Blüthgen N. 2008b. Selective interspecific tolerance in tropical CrematogasterCamponotus associations. Anim. Behav. 75: 837–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel F., Blüthgen N., Beuerle T. and Schmitt T. (submitted): Novel cuticular substances in parabiotic ants function as interspecific appeasement signals

  • Nielsen J., Boomsma J.J., Oldham N.J., Petersen H.C. and Morgan E.D. 1999. Colony-level and season-specific variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of individual workers in the ant Formica truncorum. Insect. Soc. 46: 58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orivel J., Errard C. and Dejean A. 1997. Ant gardens: Interspecific recognition in parabiotic ant species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2007

  • Richard F.J., Hefetz A., Christides J.P. and Errard C. 2004. Food influence on colonial recognition and chemical signature between nestmates in the fungus-growing ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus. Chemoecology 14: 9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorvari J., Theodora P., Turillazzi S., Hakkarainen H. and Sundström L. 2008. Food resources, chemical signaling, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica aquilonia. Behav. Ecol. 19: 441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner F.M., Schlick-Steiner B.C., Moder K., Stauffer C., Arthofer W., Buschinger A., Espadaler X., Christian E., Einfinger K., Lorbeer E., Schafellner C., Ayasse M. and Crozier R.H. 2007. Abandoning aggression but maintaining self-nonself discrimination as a first stage in ant supercolony formation. Curr. Biol. 17: 1903–1907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez A.V., Holway D.A., Liang D., Tsutsui N.D. and Case T.J. 2002. Spatiotemporal patterns of intraspecific aggression in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim. Behav. 64: 697–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez A.V., Holway D.A. and Tsutsui N.D. 2008. Genetics and behavior of a colonizing species: the invasive argentine ant. Am. Nat. 172: S72–S84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui N.D., Suarez A.V., Holway D.A. and Case T.J. 2000. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 5948–5953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui N.D., Suarez A.V. and Grosberg R.K. 2003. Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1078–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vienne C., Soroker V. and Hefetz A. 1995. Congruency of hydrocarbon patterns in heterospecific groups of ants: transfer and/or biosynthesis? Insect. Soc. 42: 267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D., Tissot M., Cuevas W. and Gordon D.M. 2000. Harvester ants utilize cuticular hydrocarbons in nestmate recognition. J. Chem. Ecol. 26: 2245–2257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Heike Feldhaar and Annett Endler for fruitful discussions and support in the GC-FID analysis. The Malaysian Economic Planning Unit (EPU) and the Danum Valley Management Committee (DVMC) kindly gave permission for our research, and Dr. Arthur Chung (Forest Research Center, Sepilok) functioned as our local collaborator. This study complies with current laws of Malaysia. F.M. was supported by a doctoral fellowship of the Bayerische Graduiertenförderung (BayEFG) and the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes. This work was also supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB-554 ‘Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Behaviour’ of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Blüthgen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menzel, F., Schmitt, T. & Blüthgen, N. Intraspecific nestmate recognition in two parabiotic ant species: acquired recognition cues and low inter-colony discrimination. Insect. Soc. 56, 251–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-009-0018-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-009-0018-0

Keywords

Navigation