Skip to main content
Log in

Impairment constraint multicasting in translucent WDM networks: architecture, network design and multicasting routing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The popularity of broadband streaming applications requires communication networks to support high-performance multicasting at the optical layer. Suffering from transmission impairments in multi-hop all-optical (transparent) WDM multicasting networks, the signal may be degraded beyond the receivable margin at some multicast destinations. To guarantee the signal quality, we introduce a translucent WDM multicasting network to regenerate the degraded signals at some switching nodes with electronic 3R (reamplification, reshaping and retiming) functionality. The translucent network is built by employing three kinds of multicasting capable switching architectures: (1) all-optical multicasting capable cross connect (oMC-OXC), (2) electronic switch and (3) translucent multicasting capable cross connect (tMC-OXC). Among them both the electronic switch and tMC-OXC are capable of electronic 3R regeneration. Furthermore, we propose a multicast-capable nodes placement algorithm based on regeneration weight, and two multicasting routing algorithms called nearest hub first and nearest on tree hub first to provide signal-quality guaranteed routes for the multicasting requests. The numerical simulation on two typical mesh networks shows that it is sufficient to equip 30% of the nodes or less with signal-regeneration capability to guarantee the signal quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eckert, T., Rosen, E.C., Aggarwal, R., Rekhter, Y.: MPLS multicast encapsulations. IETF draft, draft-rosen-mpls-multicast-encaps-00 (April 2005).

  2. Rosen, E.C., Viswanathan, A., Callon, R.: Multiprotocol label switching architecture. IETF RFC 3031 (January 2001).

  3. Delange O.E. (1970). Wide-band optical communication systems. Part II. Frequency-division multiplexing. Proc. IEEE 58(10): 1683–1690

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borella, M.S., Mukherjee, B.: A reservation-based multicasting protocol for WDM local lightwave networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICC 1995, vol. 2, pp. 1277–1281, Seattle, WA, USA (June 1995).

  5. Maier M., Scheutzow M., Reisslein M. (2003). The arrayed-waveguide grating-based single-hop WDM network: an architecture for efficient multicasting. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 21(9): 1414–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouskas G.N. (2003). Optical layer multicast: rationale, building blocks, and challenges. Network IEEE 17(1): 60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Malli, R., Zhang, X., Qiao, C.: Benefit of multicasting in all- optical networks. In: SPIE Proceedings of Conference, All-optical Networking, vol. 3531, pp. 209–220 (November 1998).

  8. Hu W., Zeng Q. (1998). Multicasting optical cross connects employing splitter-and-delivery switch. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 970–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali M., Deogun J. (2000). Power-efficient design of multicast wavelength-routed networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 18(10): 1852–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun, W., Jin, Y., Hu, W. et al.: Prototype demonstration of IP multicasting over optical networks with dynamic point-to-multipoint configuration, Proceedings of the OFC 2005, vol. 3, pp. 133–135, Anaheim, USA (March 2005).

  11. Pan, Z., Yang, H., Zhu, Z., Ben Yoo, S.J.: Experimental demonstration of a multicast-capable optical-label switching router, Proceedings of the OFC 2005, vol. 2, pp. 64–66, Anaheim, USA (March 2005).

  12. Yang X., Ramamurthy B. (2005). Sparse regeneration in translucent wavelength-routed optical networks: architecture, network design and wavelength routing. Photonic Netw. Commun. 10(1): 39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen G., Grover W.D., Cheng T.H., Bose S.K. (2002). Sparse placement of electronic switching nodes for low blocking in translucent optical networks. OSA J. Opt. Netw. 1(12): 424–441

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, K., Wu, J., Yang, C.: Multicast routing with power consideration in sparse splitting WDM networks. IEEE ICC 2001, vol. 2, pp. 513–517, Helsinki, Finland (June 2001).

  15. Hamad, A.M., Kamal, A.E.: Optimal power-aware design of all-optical multicasting in wavelength routed networks. Proceedings of the IEEE ICC 2004, vol. 3, pp. 20–24, Paris, France (June 2004).

  16. Xin, Y., Rouskas, G.N.: Multicast routing under optical layer constraints, Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 2731–2742, Hong Kong, China (March 2004).

  17. Ali M., Deogun J.(2000). Allocation of splitting nodes in all-optical wavelength-routed networks. Photonic Netw. Commun. 2(3): 247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang X., Wei J.Y., Qiao C. (2000). Constrained multicast routing in WDM networks with sparse light splitting. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 18, 1917–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sreenath N., Ram Murthy C.S., Mohan G. (2001). Virtual source based multicast routing in WDM optical networks. Photonic Netw. Commun. 3(3): 213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weisheng Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, Y., Hu, W., Sun, W. et al. Impairment constraint multicasting in translucent WDM networks: architecture, network design and multicasting routing. Photon Netw Commun 13, 93–102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022065

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022065

Keywords

Navigation