Skip to main content
Log in

Superconformally covariant OPE and general gauge mediation

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider using broken superconformal symmetry and the super operator product expansion (sOPE) to constrain and analyze hidden sector theories that couple to our gauge forces and are not necessarily weakly coupled. Conformal and supersymmetry breaking are IR effects, associated with field or spurion expectation values, whereas the sOPE is determined in the UV and hence does not notice the breaking. The broken superconformal symmetry relates OPE coefficients of superconformal descendant operators to those of the superconformal primaries. We apply these ideas to the current correlators of general gauge mediation (GGM). We also consider analyticity properties of these correlators, e.g. their discontinuities, and use the optical theorem to relate them to total scattering cross sections from visible to hidden sector states, e.g. σ(vis + vis → hidden), analogous to σ(e + e  → hadrons) in QCD. We discuss how the current-current OPE can be truncated to the first few terms to get a good approximation to the visible sector soft masses of GGM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.G. Wilson, Nonlagrangian models of current algebra, Phys. Rev. 179 (1969) 1499 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M.A. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics. Sum rules, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 385 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M.A Shifman, A. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics: applications, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 448 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, General gauge mediation, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 177 (2009)143 [arXiv:0801.3278] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Buican, P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Exploring general gauge mediation, JHEP 03 (2009)016 [arXiv:0812.3668] INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J.-F. Fortin, K.A. Intriligator and A. Stergiou, Current OPEs in superconformal theories, JHEP 09 (2011) 071 [arXiv:1107.1721] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Anselmi, J. Erlich, D. Freedman and A. Johansen, Positivity constraints on anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 7570 [hep-th/9711035] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. K.A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, The exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a, Nucl. Phys. B 667 (2003) 183 [hep-th/0304128] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Barnes, K.A. Intriligator, B. Wecht and J. Wright, \( \mathcal{N} = {1} \) RG flows, product groups and a-maximization, Nucl. Phys. B 716 (2005) 33 [hep-th/0502049] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Osborn, \( \mathcal{N} = {1} \) superconformal symmetry in four-dimensional quantum field theory, Annals Phys. 272 (1999) 243 [hep-th/9808041] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Itzykson and J.B. Zuber, Quantum field theory, McGraw-Hill, New York U.S.A. (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Leroy, OPE in supersymmetric scalar field theories, Phys. Lett. B 187 (1987) 97 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Wilsons operator expansion: can it fail?, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 445 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J.-F. Fortin, B. Grinstein and A. Stergiou, Scale without conformal invariance: an example, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 74 [arXiv:1106.2540] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. J.-F. Fortin, B. Grinstein and A. Stergiou, Scale without conformal invariance: theoretical foundations, arXiv:1107.3840 [INSPIRE].

  16. S. Ferrara, A. Grillo and R. Gatto, Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion, Annals Phys. 76 (1973) 161 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bounds on 4D conformal and superconformal field theories, JHEP 05 (2011) 017 [arXiv:1009.2087] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. T.T. Dumitrescu, Z. Komargodski, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, General messenger gauge mediation, JHEP 05 (2010) 096 [arXiv:1003.2661] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Buican and Z. Komargodski, Soft terms from broken symmetries, JHEP 02 (2010) 005 [arXiv:0909.4824] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. K.A. Intriligator and M. Sudano, General gauge mediation with gauge messengers, JHEP 06 (2010)047 [arXiv:1001.5443] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Pindor, Analyticity and physics, Lect. Notes Contr. Inf. 327 (2006) 3 .

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading U.S.A. (1995).

  23. A. Rajaraman, On the decay of unparticles, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 411 [arXiv:0806.1533] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Dimopoulos, G. Giudice and A. Pomarol, Dark matter in theories of gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Lett. B 389 (1996) 37 [hep-ph/9607225] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S.P. Martin, Generalized messengers of supersymmetry breaking and the sparticle mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 3177 [hep-ph/9608224] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. A.E. Nelson and M.J. Strassler, Suppressing flavor anarchy, JHEP 09 (2000) 030 [hep-ph/0006251] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Luty and R. Sundrum, Anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking in four-dimensions, naturally, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 045007 [hep-th/0111231] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. T.S. Roy and M. Schmaltz, Hidden solution to the μ/B μ problem in gauge mediation, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 095008 [arXiv:0708.3593] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Murayama, Y. Nomura and D. Poland, More visible effects of the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015005 [arXiv:0709.0775] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP 12 (2008) 031 [arXiv:0807.0004] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Marques, Generalized messenger sector for gauge mediation of supersymmetry breaking and the soft spectrum, JHEP 03 (2009) 038 [arXiv:0901.1326] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Fortin.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1109.4940

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fortin, JF., Intriligator, K. & Stergiou, A. Superconformally covariant OPE and general gauge mediation. J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2011)064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2011)064

Keywords

Navigation