Abstract
A number of studies have suggested that microscale asperities enhance bubble-particle attachment efficiency. However, in practice the roughening of particulate surfaces can also lead to a decrease in flotation. In the present investigation it is proposed that nanoscale asperities may be partially responsible for this phenomenon. It is suggested that as inter-asperity separation distances are reduced capillary effects are enhanced, leading to the formation of stable liquid domains that adversely impact bubble-particle adhesion. In addition, obstruction of surfactant self-assembly may occur, further limiting flotation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamson, A.W. and Gast, A.P., 1997, “The solid-liquid interface — Contact angle,” Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 6th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 347–389.
Anfruns, J.F., and Kitchener, J.A., 1977, “Rate of capture of small particles in flotation,” Trans. Inst. Mining. Met., Vol. 86, pp. C9–C15.
Blake, P., and Ralston, J., 1985, “Particle size, surface coverage and flotation response,” Colloids Surf, Vol. 16, No. 1, Oct., pp. 41–53.
Bico, J., Tordeux, C., and Quere, D., 2001, “Rough wetting,” Europhys. Lett., Vol.55, pp. 214–220.
Drefahl, A., Seidel, O., and Mogel, H., 1998, “Nanosystem similarity: Modeling and comparison of amphiphilic monolayers adsorbed on nanorough surfaces” J. Chem. Comput. Sci., Vol. 38, pp. 1223–1231.
Fragneto, G., Thomas, R.K., Rennie, A.R., and Penfold, J., 1996, “Neutron reflection from hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide adsorbed on smooth and rough silicon surfaces,” Langmuir, Vol. 12, pp. 6036–6043.
Leja, J. and Schulman, J.H., 1954, “Flotation theory: Molecular interactions between frothers and collectors at solid-liquid-air interfaces,” Trans. AIME, Feb. pp. 221–228.
Nguyen, A.V., Shulze, H.J., and Ralston, J., 1997, “Elementary steps in particle-bubble attachment,” Int. J. Miner. Process., Vol. 51, Oct., pp. 183–195.
Ralston, J., Dukhin, S.S., and Mishchuk, N.A., 1999, “Inertial hydrodynamic particle-bubble interaction in flotation,” Int. J. Miner. Process, Vol. 56, pp. 207–256.
Rabinovich, Y.I., Adler, J. J., Ata, A., Singh, R.K., and Moudgil, B.M., 2000, “Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces: I. Role of Asperity Geometry,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., Vol. 232, pp. 10–16.
Rabinovich, Y.I., Adler, J. J., Ata, A., Singh, R.K., and Moudgil, B.M., 2000, “Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces: II. Measurement and comparison with theory,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., Vol. 232, pp. 17–24.
Shiao, S.Y., Patist, A., Free, M.L., Chhabra, V., Huibers, P.D.T., Gregory, A., Patel, S., and Shah, D.O., 1997, “The importance of sub-angstrom distances in mixed surfactant systems for technological processes,” Colloids and Surfaces A, Vol. 128, pp. 197–208.
Wenzel, R.N., 1936, “Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water,” Ind. Eng. Chem., Vol. 28, pp. 988–994
Zongfu, D., Fornasiero, D., and Ralston, J., 1999, “Particle-bubble attachment in mineral flotation,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., Vol. 217, pp. 70–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, S.C., Moudgil, B.M. Influence of nanoscale roughness on surface wettability. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 21, 33–35 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403299
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403299