Skip to main content
Log in

Intertemporal Decision-Making for a Group

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporal discounting assessments measure the reduction in the subjective value of a reward as a function of the delay to that reward, and are correlated with behavior in social dilemma. Among the solutions proposed for defection in social dilemmas is a single individual making the decisions for the group. The present study examined the influence of group context on temporal discounting. Participants completed temporal discounting procedures when the outcomes affected only the individual and when outcomes affected a group of 10, including the individual. Though no overall difference was observed between the individual and group conditions, sex was found to be a moderating variable: Males discounted significantly more when discounting for the individual, but females discounted significantly more when discounting for the group. These results indicate that sex is an important variable when making intertemporal decisions for a group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AINSLIE, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALESSI, S. M., & PETRY, N. M. (2003). Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behavioural Processes, 64, 345–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ANDREONI, J., & VESTERLUND, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BICKEL, W. K., & MARSCH, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96, 73–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BICKEL, W. K., MILLER, M. L., YI, R., KOWAL., B. P., LINDQUIST, D. M., & PITCOCK, J. A. (2007). Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, S85–S91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BOLTON, G. E., & KATOK, E. (1995). An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economic Letters, 48, 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BREWER, M. B., & KRAMER, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effect of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50(3), 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN-KRUSE, J., & HUMMELS, D. (1993). Gender effects in laboratory public goods contributions: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CADSBY, C. B., & MAYNES, E. (1998). Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., MARLEY, J., & JACOBS, E. A. (2003). Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 449–458

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ECKEL, C. C., & GROSSMAN, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal, 108, 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECKEL, C. C., & GROSSMAN, P. J. (2008). Sex and risk: Experimental evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, L. H., RICHARDS, J. B., SAAD, F. G., PALUCH, R. A., ROEMMICH, J. N., & LERMAN, C. (2003). Comparison between two measures of delay discounting in smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 131–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FLEISHMAN, J. A. (1980). Collective action as helping behavior: Effects of responsibility diffusion on contributions to a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 629–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., FRY, A. F., & MYERSON, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A. life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., & OSTASZEWSKI, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 418–427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, A. C., & MADDEN, G. J. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52, 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEEREY, E. A., ROBINSON, B. M., MCMAHON, R. P., & GOLD, J. M. (2007). Delay discounting in schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 12, 213–221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HOLT, D. D., GREEN, L., & MYERSON, J. (2003). Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students. Behavioural Processes, 64, 355–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JONES, B., & RACHLIN, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KIRBY, K. N., & MARKOVIC, N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subject and amounts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KIRBY, K. N., & MARKOVIC, N. (1996). Delayed-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 3, 100–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KOWAL, B. P., YI, R., ERISMAN, A., & BICKEL, W. K. (2007). A. comparison of two algorithms in computerized temporal discounting procedures. Behavioural Processes, 75, 231–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KRAMER, R. M., & BREWER, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 1044–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MADDEN, G. J., BEGOTKA, A. M., RAIFF, B. R., & KASTERN, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 139–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MADDEN, G. J., BICKEL, W. K., & JACOBS, E. A. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards in opioid-dependent outpatients: Exponential or hyperbolic discounting functions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 7, 284–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MADDEN, G. J., RAIFF, B. R., LAGORIO, C. H., BEGOTKA, A. M., MUELLER, A. M., HEHLI, D. J., & WEGENER, A. A. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: Ii. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MAZUR, J. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. Commons, J. Mazur, J. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.). The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MESSICK, D. M., & BREWER, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A. review. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.). Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 11–44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAVARICK, D. J. (2004). Discounting of delayed reinforcers: Measurement by questionnaires versus operant choice procedures. The Psychological Record, 54, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOWELL, C. & TINKLER, S. (1994). The influence of gender on the provision of a public good. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H., & JONES, B. (2008a). Altruism among relatives and non-relatives. Behavioural Processes, 79, 120–123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H., & JONES, B. (2008b). Social discounting and delay discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(1). 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REIMERS, S., MAYLOR, E. A., STEWART, N., & CHATER, N. (2009). Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measures and age, income, education, and real-world impulsive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 973–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REYNOLDS, B. (2006). A. review of delay-discounting research with humans: Relations to drug use and gambling. Behavioural Pharmacology, 17, 651–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ROBLES, E., & VARGAS, P. A. (2007). Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks: Order of presentation. Behavioural Processes, 75, 237–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ROBLES, E., & VARGAS, P. A. (2008). Parameters of delay discounting assessment: Number of trials, efforts, and sequential effects. Behavioural Processes, 78, 285–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SEGUINO, S., STEVENS, T., & LUTZ, M. (1996). Gender and cooperative behaviour: Economic man rides alone. Feminist Economics, 2, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SELL, J. (1997). Gender, strategies, and contributions to public goods. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 252–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SELL, J., GRIFFITH, W. I., & WILSON, R. K. (1993). Are women more cooperative then men in social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SELL, J., & WILSON, R. K. (1991). Levels of information and contributions to public goods. Social Forces, 70, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIMPSON, C. A., & VUCHINICH, R. E. (2000). Reliability of a measure of temporal discounting. The Psychological Record, 50, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, C. L., & HANTULA, D. A. (2008). Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: A. comparison of tasks and modes. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 940–953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WELLER, R. E., COOK, E. W., AVSAR, K. B., & COX, J. E. (2008). Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite, 51, 563–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHELAN, R., & MCHUGH, L. A. (2009). Temporal discounting of hypothetical monetary rewards by adolescents, adults, and older adults. The Psychological Record, 59, 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • YI, R., BUCHHALTER, A. R., GATCHALIAN, K. M., & BICKEL, W. K. (2007). The relationship between temporal discounting and the prisoner’s dilemma game in intranasal abusers of prescription opioids. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 87, 94–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • YI, R., DE LA PIEDAD, X., & BICKEL, W.K. (2006). The combined effects of delay and probability discounting. Behavioural Processes, 73, 149–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • YI, R., JOHNSON, M. W., & BICKEL, W. K. (2005). Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoner’s dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes. Learning and Behavior, 33, 324–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Yi PhD.

Additional information

This research was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R01 DA11692.

The authors thank Katie McLean, Cody Burnett, Larrah Jenkins, and Renee Steed for assistance with data collection and analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, R., King, L.F., Carter, A.E. et al. Intertemporal Decision-Making for a Group. Psychol Rec 60, 577–586 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395733

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395733

Key words

Navigation