Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Prior Conditional Discrimination Training, Symmetry, Transitivity, and Equivalence Testing on the Emergence of New Equivalence Classes

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior studies have shown that the establishment of equivalence classes using the simple-to-complex protocol significantly enhanced the emergence of other new equivalence classes under the simultaneous protocol (yield). The current experiment showed how those enhancement effects were influenced by each component of the protocol used to establish the initial equivalence classes. Yield during the simultaneous protocol was not improved following the prior establishment of other baseline conditional discriminations alone. The prior establishment of the conditional discriminations plus symmetry testing produced a small increment in yield. The prior establishment of conditional discriminations plus transitivity testing produced a very large increment in yield. The prior establishment of conditional discriminations plus transitivity and symmetry testing, or symmetry, transitivity and equivalence testing (i.e., equivalence class formation) did not produce further increments in yield. Thus, the enhanced emergence of new equivalence classes under the simultaneous protocol was due to prior demonstrations of transitivity rather than to the prior establishment of other equivalence classes. Some possible behavioral processes responsible for these effects are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADAMS, B. J. (1998). Effects of unreinforced conditional selection training, multiple negative comparison training, and reinforcement on equivalence class formation. Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty at the City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L. & VERHAVE, T. (1993). The effects of test order on the establishment and expansion of equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 43, 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BUFFINGTON, D. M., FIELDS, L., & ADAMS, B. J. (1997). Enhancing the formation of equivalence classes by pretraining of other equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 47, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & Newman, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., LANDON-JIMENEZ, D. V., BUFFINGTON, D. M., & ADAMS, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal distance effects after equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., & REEVE, K. E (in press). Synthesizing equivalence classes and natural categories from perceptual and relational classes. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.

  • FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. E., ADAMS, B. J., & VERHAVE, T. (1991). The generalization of equivalence relations: a model for natural categories. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 305–312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. F., ROSEN, D., VARELAS, A., ADAMS, B. J., BELANICH, J., & HOBBIE, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 367–389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., VERHAVE, T., & FATH, S. J. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 143–157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HARLOW, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence or consistent nonequivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LYNCH, D. G., & CUVO, A. J. (1995). Stimulus equivalence instruction of fraction-decimal relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 115–126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. N. (1977). Stimulus control: Attention factors. In. W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEOPLES, M., TIERNY, K. J., BRACKEN, M., & MACKAY, C. (1998). Prior learning and equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 48, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PILGRIM, O., & GALIZIO, M. (in press). Stimulus equivalence and units of analysis. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.

  • SAUNDERS, R. L., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHUSTERMAN, R., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Aalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMEETS, R. M., LEADER, G., & BARNES, D. (1997). Establishing stimulus classes in adults and children using a respondent-type training procedure: A followup study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPENCER, T. J., & CHASE, P. N. (1996). Speed analyses of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 643–659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M. J., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was conducted with support from Contract DASW01-96-K-0009-from the U.S. Army Research Institute and from a number of PSC/CUNY Research Awards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fields, L., Varelas, A., Reeve, K.F. et al. Effects of Prior Conditional Discrimination Training, Symmetry, Transitivity, and Equivalence Testing on the Emergence of New Equivalence Classes. Psychol Rec 50, 443–466 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395365

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395365

Navigation