Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing the Reinforcement Process at the Human Level: Can Application and Behavioristic Interpretation Replace Laboratory Research?

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critics have questioned the value of human operant conditioning experiments in the study of fundamental processes of reinforcement. Contradictory results from human and animal experiments have been attributed to the complex social and verbal history of the human subject. On these grounds, it has been contended that procedures that mimic those conventionally used with animal subjects represent a “poor analytic preparation” for the explication of reinforcement principles. In defending the use of conventional operant methods for human research, we make three points: (a) Historical variables play a critical role in research on processes of reinforcement, regardless of whether the subjects are humans or animals. (b) Techniques are available for detecting, analyzing, and counteracting such historical and extra-experimental influences; these include long-term observations, steady state designs, and, when variables are not amenable to direct control (e.g., age, gender, species), selection of subjects with common characteristics. (c) Other forms of evidence that might be used to validate conditioning principles—applied behavior analysis and behavioristic interpretation—have inherent limitations and cannot substitute for experimental analysis. We conclude that human operant conditioning experiments are essential for the analysis of the reinforcement process at the human level, but caution that their value depends on the extent to which the traditional methods of the experimental analysis of behavior are properly applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azrin, N. H. (1958). Some effects of noise on human behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 183–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, A. J. (1981). Psychological research (4th ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M. (1981). A flight of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 85–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1976). Clock control of human performance on avoidance and fixed-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 165–180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Journey, J. W. (1989). Reinforcement of human reaction time: Manual-vocal differences. The Psychological Record, 39, 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Kaufman, A. (1966). Human free-operant avoidance of “time-out” from monetary reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 557–565.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Perone, M. (1982). The place of the human subject in the operant laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 143–158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. E. (1977). Behavioral history as a determinant of the effects of d-amphetamine on punished behavior. Science, 198, 67–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. E. (1986). Behavioral history: Residual influences on subsequent behavior and drug effects. In N. Krasnegor & D. B. Gray (Eds.), Developmental behavioral pharmacology: Vol. V. Advances in behavioral pharmacology (pp. 99–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, D. J. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Designing session logistics—How long, how often, how many? The Behavior Analyst, 11, 51–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskist, W., & Miller, H. L. (1982). The study of human operant behavior, 1958–1981: A topical bibliography. The Psychological Record, 32, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). [Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior]. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. (1951). Experimental naivete and experiential naivete. Psychological Bulletin, 48, 327–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E. (1983). Las Vegas knows better. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 109–110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. (1988). Trends in human operant theory. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 1–14). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G., & Cullen, C. (Eds.). (1988). Human operant conditioning and behavior modification. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. M. (1978). Current status of applied behavior analysis: Science versus technology. American Psychologist, 33, 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. M. (1982). Defining applied behavior analysis: An historical analogy. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 53–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. M. (1983). Two correct definitions of “applied.” The Behavior Analyst, 6, 105–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M. R., & Ratner, S. C. (1970). Comparative psychology: Research in animal behavior (rev. ed.). Homewood, NJ: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J. A. (1983). Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 693–728. (Includes commentary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli, M., & Thompson, T. (1989). Effects of methadone on alternative fixed-ratio fixed-interval performance: Latent influences on schedule-controlled responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 141–153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Epling, W. F., & Pierce, W. D. (1983). Applied behavior analysis: New directions from the laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 27–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1972). Reinforcement in human behavior. American Scientist, 60, 723–729.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B. (1953). The use of the free operant in the analysis of behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 263–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galizio, M., & Buskist, W. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Selecting reinforcers and arranging contingencies. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 65–69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hake, D. F. (1982). The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 21–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1987a). Upward and downward continuity: It’s time to change our strategic assumptions. Behavior Analysis, 22, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1987b). Language and the incompatibility of evolutionary and psychological continuity. Behavior Analysis, 22, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1986). The relationship between subject and experimenter. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 123–126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. G. (1958). Human vigilance. Science, 128, 61–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. M., & Harrison, R. H. (1960). Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 246–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laties, V. G., & Weiss, B. (1960). Human observing behavior after signal detection. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3, 27–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Advances in analysis of behaviour: Vol. 1. Reinforcement and the organization of behaviour (pp. 159–192). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F. (1983). Radical behaviorism and human psychology. In G. C. L. Davey (Ed.), Animal models of human behavior (pp. 71–93). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, A., Bonem, M., Green, G., & Osborne, J. G. (1984). A citation analysis of the influence on research of Skinner’s Verbal behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 157–167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Menich, S. R., & Baron, A. (1984). Social housing of rats: Life-span effects on reaction time, exploration, weight, and longevity. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1987). The experimental analysis of human behavior: History, current status and future directions. Comments by the discussant. The Psychological Record, 37, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. L., Jr. (1983). More than promissory? Reflections on the once and future experimental analysis of human behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 551–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. K., Johnson, L. M., Todd, J. T., & Higgins, S. T. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Subject selection. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 43–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M. (1985). On the impact of human operant research: Asymmetrical patterns of cross-citation between human and nonhuman research. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 185–189.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Use and abuse of subjects’ verbal reports. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 71–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M. (in press). Experimental design in the analysis of free-operant behavior. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Techniques in the behavioral and neural sciences: Experimental analysis of behavior. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

  • Perone, M., & Baron, A. (1980). Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulus correlated with extinction or increased effort. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 239–261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M., Galizio, M., & Baron, A. (1988). The relevance of animal-based principles in the laboratory study of human operant conditioning. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 59–85). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1980). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, C., & Johnston, J. M. (1988). Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Issues in instructing subjects. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 59–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Poling, A. (1984). Comparing humans to other species: We’re animals and they’re not infrahumans. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 211–212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Poling, A., Picker, M., Grossen, D., Hall-Johnson, E., & Holbrook, M. (1981). The schism between experimental and applied behavior analysis: Is it real and who cares? The Behavior Analyst, 4, 93–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Poppen, R. (1982). The fixed-interval scallop in human affairs. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 127–136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (1989). Judgment, decision, and choice: A cognitive/behavioral synthesis. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Attention in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 203–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B., & Lacey, H. (1988). What applied studies of human operant conditioning tell us about humans and about operant conditioning. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 27–42). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, R. L., Lawrence, P. S., Tota, M. E., Sharp, J. A., Drusdow, M. A., Torquato, R. D., & Soyars, V. A. (1989). [Review of Davey and Cullen’s Human operant conditioning and behavior modification]. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 69–77.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1975). Comment on Watt’s “B. F. Skinner and the technological control of social behavior.” The American Political Science Review, 69, 228–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1978). Reflections on behaviorism and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., & DeNike, L. D. (1966). Descriptive behaviorism versus cognitive theory in verbal conditioning experiments. Psychological Review, 73, 306–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (1969). The use of operant conditioning techniques to investigate perceptual processes in animals. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning (pp. 1–33). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbain, C., Poling, A., Millam, J., & Thompson, T. (1978). d-amphetamine and fixed-interval performance: Effects of operant history. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 385–392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wanchisen, B. A. (1990). Forgetting the lessons of history. The Behavior Analyst, 13, 31–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wanchisen, B. A., Tatham, T. A., & Mooney, S. E. (1989). Variable-ratio conditioning history produces high- and low-rate fixed-interval performance in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 167–179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J. H. (1988). Some neglected problems in the analysis of human operant behavior. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 197–224). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1962). Some effects of response cost upon human operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 201–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1964). Conditioning history and human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 383–385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1969). Controlling human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 349–373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1983). Some thoughts on discrepant human-animal performances under schedules of reinforcement. The Psychological Record, 33, 521–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. S. (1980). On the alleged incompatibility of analysis and application: A response to Pierce and Epling. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 67–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA

    Alan Baron

  2. Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA

    Michael Perone

  3. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, 28406, USA

    Mark Galizio

Authors
  1. Alan Baron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Perone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Galizio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baron, A., Perone, M. & Galizio, M. Analyzing the Reinforcement Process at the Human Level: Can Application and Behavioristic Interpretation Replace Laboratory Research?. BEHAV ANALYST 14, 95–105 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392557

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392557

Keywords

Search

Navigation