Skip to main content
Log in

Immediate cognitive effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in eating disorders: A pilot study

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of high frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), delivered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, on selective attention in people with a bulimic disorder. METHOD: Participants (N=33) were randomised to a single session of real or sham rTMS. They performed a Stroop colour word task before and after the rTMS intervention. Interference scores were calculated as the time difference between completing cards with congruent and incongruent stimuli. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance comparing the interference scores post-rTMS with the pre-rTMS scores as covariates showed no differences between the real and sham groups [F(1,32)=1.110; p=0.301]. DISCUSSION: While methodological issues warrant a cautious interpretation, these pilot data suggest that selective attention is unaffected by a single session of rTMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Slotema CW, Blom JD, Hoek HW, et al. Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)? a meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71: 873–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schlaepfer TE, George MS, Mayberg H. WFSBP Guidelines on Brain Stimulation Treatments in Psychiatry. World J Biol Psychiatry 2010; 11: 2–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walpoth M, Hoertnagl C, Mangweth-Matzek B, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in bulimia nervosa: preliminary results of a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in female outpatients. Psychother Psychosom 2008; 77: 57–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van den Eynde F, Claudino AM, Mogg A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces cue-induced food craving in bulimic disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67: 793–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Claudino AM, Van den Eynde F, Stahl D, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces cortisol levels in bulimic disorders. Psychol Med 2010; 7: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Eynde F, Claudino AM, Campbell I, et al. Cardiac safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in bulimic eating disorders. Brain Stimulation 2011; 4: 112–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uher R, Yoganathan D, Mogg A, et al. Effect of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on food craving. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 58: 840–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guse B, Falkai P, Wobrock T. Cognitive effects of highfrequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review. J Neural Transm 2010; 117: 105–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Banich MT, Milham MP, Jacobson BL, et al. Attentional selection and the processing of task-irrelevant information: insights from fMRI examinations of the Stroop task. Prog Brain Res 2001; 134: 459–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson L, Ghaderi A, Andersson G. Stroop interference for food- and body-related words: a metaanalysis. Eat Behav 2005; 6: 271–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter FA, Bulik CM, McIntosh VV, et al. Changes on the stroop test following treatment: relation to word type, treatment condition, and treatment outcome among women with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2000; 28: 349–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van den Eynde F, Guillaume S, Broadbent H, et al. Neurocognition in bulimic eating disorders: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand, doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0447.2011.01701.x., 2011.

  13. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935; 18: 643–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davidson DJ, Zacks RT, Williams CC. Stroop interference, practice, and aging. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2003; 10: 85–98.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schroeter ML, Zysset S, Wahl M, et al. Prefrontal activation due to Stroop interference increases during development — an event-related fNIRS study. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 1317–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hadland KA, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE, et al. Interference with performance of a response selection task that has no working memory component: an rTMS comparison of the dorsolateral prefrontal and medial frontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13: 1097–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rektorova I, Megova S, Bares M, et al. Cognitive functioning after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebrovascular disease without dementia: a pilot study of seven patients. J Neurol Sci 2005; 229–230: 157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martis B, Alam D, Dowd SM, et al. Neurocognitive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe major depression. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 1125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hausmann A, Pascual-Leone A, Kemmler G, et al. No deterioration of cognitive performance in an aggressive unilateral and bilateral antidepressant rTMS addon trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65: 772–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner M, Rihs TA, Mosimann UP, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects divided attention immediately after cessation of stimulation. J Psychiatr Res 2006; 40: 315–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vanderhasselt MA, De Raedt R, Baeken C, et al. The influence of rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on Stroop task performance. Exp Brain Res 2006; 169: 279–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosimann UP, Schmitt W, Greenberg BD, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a putative add-on treatment for major depression in elderly patients. Psychiatry Res 2004; 126: 123–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moser DJ, Jorge RE, Manes F, et al. Improved executive functioning following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 2002; 58: 1288–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jorge RE, Robinson RG, Tateno A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as treatment of poststroke depression: a preliminary study. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 55: 398–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boggio PS, Fregni F, Bermpohl F, et al. Effect of repetitive TMS and fluoxetine on cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease and concurrent depression. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 1178–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Avery DH, Holtzheimer PE 3rd, Fawaz W, et al. A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 59: 187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Van den Eynde MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van den Eynde, F., Claudino, A.M., Campbell, I.C. et al. Immediate cognitive effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in eating disorders: A pilot study. Eat Weight Disord 16, 45–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327520

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327520

Key words

Navigation