Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The SF-36 as a precursory measure of adaptive functioning in normal aging: the Maastricht Aging Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Functional independence (FI) is commonly measured by checklist questionnaires that grade whether specific daily living tasks can be performed with or without ancillary assistance. Among older adults who are functioning independently precursory measures of daily living may be useful in gauging how long an individual can remain independent in advanced age. This study examined the SF-36, a standardized self-report measure of health-related quality of life, as a precursory marker of FI in a representative sample of healthy older adults. Methods: The study consisted of 696 Dutch enrollees from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS) who were 50 years and older and had been screened for health and cognitive deficits. They were assessed at two time points separated by a nine-year interval on standardized activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) items that measure the presence or absence of assistance need across five functional domains. MAAS enrollees also received the SF-36 at both time points. Results: The SF- 36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) predicted change in ADL/IADL assistance need after nine years (OR 0.94, CI 0.92–0.97). Conclusion: In older adults from MAAS who were otherwise functioning independently at baseline, the SF-36 PCS was a suitable precursory measure of the emergence of assistance need after nine years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacNeill SE, Lichtenberg PA. Predictors for functional outcome in older rehabilitation patients. Rehabil Psychol 1998; 43: 246–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmer J, Rothenberg B, Andersen E. Functional assessment. In Andersen E, ed. Functional Assessment in Assessing the Health Status of Older Adults. New York, NY: Springer, 1997: pp 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reuben DB, Valle LA, Hays RD, Siu AL. Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: A comparison of selfadministered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 17–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peres K, Helmer C, Amieva H. Natural history of decline in instrumental activities of daily living performance over the 10 years preceding the clinical diagnosis of dementia: A prospective population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. JAMA 1963; 185: 914–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional Evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965; 12: 61–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartigan I. A comparative review of the Katz ADL and the Bathel Index in assessing the activities of daily living of older people. Int J Older People Nursing 2007; 2: 204–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holstein BE, Due P, Almind G, Avlund K. Eight-year change in functional ability among 70-to 95-year-olds. Scand J Public Health 2007; 35: 243–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kempen GIJM, Miedema I, Ormel J, Molenaar W. The assessment of disability with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1602–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kempen GIJM, Scaf-Klompb W, Ranchorb AV, Sandermanb R, Ormelc J. Social predictors of recovery in late middle-aged and older persons after injury to the extremities. J Gerontol Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2001; 56: 229–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolf C, Morgan M. The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: Is it Suitable for use with Older Adults? Age Ageing 2007; 24: 120–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sabbah I, Drouby N, Sabbah N, Retel-Rude N, Mercer M. Quality of life in rural and urban populations in Lebanon using SF-36 Health Survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Metsemakers JF, Hoppener P, Knottnerus JA, Kocken RJ, Limonard CB. Computerized health information in The Netherlands: a registration network of family practices. Br J Gen Pract 1992; 42: 102–6.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jolles J, Commissaris CJAM, Bosma H, van Boxtel MP, Ponds RWHM, Metsemakers JFM. De Maastricht Aging Study en het longitudinale perspectief van cognitieve veroudering. In Schene AH, Boer F, Heeren TJ, Henselmans HWJ, Trijsburg RW, Vandereycken W, van der Velden K, eds. Jaarboek voor Psychiatrie en Psychotherapie 2001; 7: 175–93.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Beijsterveldt CE, van Boxtel MP, Bosma H, Houx PJ, Buntinx F, Jolles J. Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal cognitive aging study: the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS). J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 55: 216–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arrindell WA, Ettema JHM. SCL-90. Een multidimensionele psychopathologie indicator (The SCL-90. A multidimensional instrument for the assessment of psychopathology). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van der Zee KI, Xanderman R, Heyink J. Psychometrische kwaliteiten van de MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in een Nederlandse populaties. Sociale Gezondheidzorg 1993; 71: 183–91.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guilley E, Ghisletta P, Armi F, Berchtold A, d’Epinay J-PM, de Ribaupierre A. Dynamics of frailty and ADL dependence in a fiveyear longitudinal study of octogenarians. Res Aging 2008; 30: 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuh D. A life course approach to healthy aging, frailty, and capability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007; 62: 717–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Amieva H, Jaquim-Gadda H, Orgogozo JM et al. The nineyear cognitive decline of dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: A population based study. Brain 2005; 128: 1093–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Robert D. Hill PhD, Susanne Valentijn, Jelle Jolles & Martin van Boxtel

  2. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, 1705E Campus Ctr Dr., RM 327, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA

    Robert D. Hill PhD & Emma Mansour

Authors
  1. Robert D. Hill PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susanne Valentijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jelle Jolles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martin van Boxtel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert D. Hill PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, R.D., Mansour, E., Valentijn, S. et al. The SF-36 as a precursory measure of adaptive functioning in normal aging: the Maastricht Aging Study. Aging Clin Exp Res 22, 433–439 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324943

Key words

Search

Navigation