Skip to main content
Log in

Correct Heteroduplex Formation for Mutation Detection Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The majority of mutation detection methods for unknown mutations are polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods dependent on the formation of heteroduplexes between wild-type and mutant strands of DNA.

Methods and Results: This report discusses the difficulties associated with forming heteroduplexes with a large DNA fragment and the implications for subsequent mutation detection by the chemical cleavage of mismatch technique and other methods reliant on heteroduplex formation. It was found that the size and sequence context of the fragment being investigated inhibited correct heteroduplex formation. The problem was overcome by dividing the sequence into two overlapping fragments.

Conclusions: Early identification of this problem in other fragments will help with the rapid optimization of PCR-based mutation detection methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cotton RGH: Mutation detection. Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyers RM, Fischer SG, Maniatis T, Lerman LS: Modification of the melting properties of duplex DNA by attachment of a GC-rich DNA sequence as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res 1985;13: 3111–3129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams ES, Murdaugh SE, Lerman LS: Comprehensive detection of single base changes in human genomic DNA using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and a GC clamp. Genomics 1990;7: 463–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Orita M, Suzuki Y, Sekiya T, Hayashi K: Rapid and sensitive detection of point mutations and DNA polymorphisms using the polymerase chain reaction. Genomics 1989;5: 874–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Danenberg PV, Horikoshi T, Volkenandt M, et al: Detection of point mutations in human DNA by analysis of RNA conformation polymorphism(s). Nucleic Acids Res 1992;20: 573–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. White MB, Carvalho M, Derse D, O’Brien SJ, Dean M: Detecting single base substitutions as heteroduplex polymorphisms. Genomics 1992; 12: 301–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman GJ, Huang AS: Mapping temperature-sensitive mutants of vesicular stomatitis virus by RNA heteroduplex formation. J Gen Virol 1981;57: 103–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbs RA, Caskey CT: Identification and localization of mutations at the Lesch-Nyhan locus by ribo-nuclease A cleavage. Science 1987;236: 303–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Youil R, Kemper BW, Cotton RGH: Screening for mutations by enzyme mismatch cleavage with T4 endonuclease VIII. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92: 87–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganguly T, Dhulipala R, Godmilow L, Ganguly A: High throughput fluorescence-based conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis (F-CSGE) identifies six unique BRCA2 mutations and an overall low incidence of BRCA2 mutations in high-risk BRCA1-negative breast cancer families. Hum Genet 1998; 102: 549–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuklin A, Munson K, Gjerde D, Haefele R, Taylor P: Detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with the WAVE™ DNA Fragment Analysis System: Genet Testing 1997; 1: 201–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cotton RGH, Rodrigues NR, Campbell RD: Reactivity of cytosine and thymine in single base-pair mismatches with hydroxylamine and osmium tetroxide and its application to the study of mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;85: 4397–4401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Verpy E, Biasotto M, Meo T, Tosi M: Efficient detection of point mutations on color coded strands of target DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91: 1873–1877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Verpy E, Biasotto M, Brai M, Misiano G, Tommaso M, Tosi M: Exhaustive mutation scanning by fluorescence-assisted mismatch analysis discloses new genotype-phenotype correlations in angioderma. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59: 308–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowley G, Saad S, Giannelli F, Green PM: Ultra-rapid mutation detection by multiplex, solid-phase chemical cleavage. Genomics 1995;30: 574–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherrington R, Rogaev EI, Liang Y, et al.: Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 1995;375: 754–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark RF, Hutton M, Fuldner RA, et al: The structure of the presenilin 1 (S182) gene and identification of six novel mutations in early onset AD families. Nat Genet 1995;11: 219–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Anwar R, Moynihan TP, Ardley H, et al.: Molecular analysis of the presenilin 1 (S182) gene in “sporadic” cases of Alzheimer’s disease: Identification and characterisation of unusual splice variants. J Neurochem 1996;66: 1774–1777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tosi M, Verpy E, Meo T: Detection of mutations by fluorescence-assisted mismatch analysis. (FAMA). In Dracopoli NC, Haines JL, Korf BR, Moir DT, Morton CC, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Smith DR (ed): Current protocols in human genetics. Greene/ Wiley, 1997, pp. 7.8.1-7.8.11

  20. Hansen LL, Justesen J, Kruse TA: Sensitive and fast mutation detection by solid phase chemical cleavage. Hum Mutat 1996;7: 256–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cole WG, Chiodo AA, Lamande SR, et al.: A base substitution at a splice site in the COL3A1 gene causes exon skipping and generates abnormal type III procollagen in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Biol Chem 1990;265: 17070–17077

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez-Tur J, Froelich S, Prihar G, et al.: A mutation in Alzheimer’s disease destroying a splice acceptor site in the presenilin-1 gene. Neuroreport 1996;7: 297–301

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crook R, Verkkoniemi A, Perez-Tur J, et al.: A variant of Alzheimer’s disease with spastic paraparesis and unusual plaques due to a deletion of exon 9 of presenilin 1. Nat Med 1998;4: 452–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard G. H. Cotton PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, M.J., Humphrey, K.E., Cappai, R. et al. Correct Heteroduplex Formation for Mutation Detection Analysis. Molecular Diagnosis 5, 67–73 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262025

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262025

Key words

Navigation