Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical research on developmental aspects of metamemory

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some selected pioneering findings in the child-developmental and adulthood-aging literature are reviewed and evaluated within the framework of Nelson and Narens’ (1990) theory of metamemory. Suggestions are made for conceptually-based analytical research to help specify the mechanism(s) that underlie developmental differences in metamemory.

Résumé

On a sélectionné quelques données princeps dans la littérature sur le développement de l’enfant et le vieillissement. Ces données sont examinées et évaluées dans le cadre de la théorie de la métamémoire proposée par Nelson et Narens. Des suggestions sont faites pour une recherche analytique guidée par les concepts «conceptually-based» permettant d’aider à spécifier les mécanismes responsables des différences développementales dans le domaine de la métamémoire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldi, R. (1996).The effects of memory monitoring, self-referent believes, memory complaints, and depression on judgements of learning in young and older adults. Unpublished dissertation, University of Maryland. College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. H., Kyaw, D., & Kilbey, M. M. (1984). Metamemory of alcoholic Korsakoff patients.Society for Neurosciences Abstracts, 10, 318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuhring, T., & Kee, D. W. (1987). Developmental relationships among metamemory, elaborative strategy use, and associative memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44, 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieman-Copland, S., & Charness, N. (1994). Memory knowledge and memory monitoring in adulthood.Psychology and Aging, 9, 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D.F. (1988). Acquiring a mnemonic: Age and category knowledge effects.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boneau, C. A. (1990). Psychological literacy: A first approximation.American, Psychologist, 45, 891–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J.G., Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1989). The challenges of teaching good information processing to learning disabled students.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, M. C., & Pressley, M. (1988). Cognitive monitoring and strategy choice in younger and older adults.Psychology and Aging, 3, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, J.C. (1996). Memory self-efficacy as a moderator of memory change. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T.M. Hess (Eds.),Perspectives on cognitive change in adulthood and aging (pp. 488–507). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1981). Aging and skilled problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.),Children’s thinking: What develops (pp. 73–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989) Children’s spontaneous allocation of study time: Differential and sufficient aspects.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folds, T.H., Footo, M.M., Guttentag, R.E., & Ornstein, P.A. (1990). When children mean to remember: Issues of content specificity, strategy effectiveness, and intentionality in the development of memory. In D.F. Bjorklund (Eds).Children’s Strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development (pp. 67–91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, C., & Dixon, R.A. (1994). Metacognitive development in adulthood and old age. In J. Metcalfe & A.P. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 227–251). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulicka, I.M., & Grossman, J.L. (1967). Age-group comparisons for the use of mediators in paired associate learning.Journal of Gerontology, 22, 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowsky, J.S., Shimamura, A.P., & Squire, L.R. (1989). Memory and metamemory: Comparisons between patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients.Psychobiology, 17, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D.H. (1991).Experimental psychology, cognition, and human aging (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, G., Cornoldi, C., & Marchitelli, G. (1990). Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?Memory & Cognition, 18, 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T.O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1263–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A.P. (1994).Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P.H., & Seier, W.L. (1994). Strategy utilization deficiencies in children: When, where, and why. In H.W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior, 25, 108–156.

  • Murphy, M.D., Sanders, R.E., Gabriesheski, A.S., & Schmitt, F.A. (1981). Metamemory in the aged.Journal of Gerontology, 36, 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T.O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition.American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T.O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In G.H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125–173). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owings, R., Petersen, G., Bransford, J., Morris, C., & Stein, B. (1980). Spontaneous monitoring and regulation of learning: A comparison of successful and less successful fifth graders.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebok, G.W., & Balcerak, C.J. (1989). Memory self-efficacy and performance differences in young and olds adults: The effects of mnemonic training.Developmental Psychology, 25, 714–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, M. (1984). The use of categorical organization: Not an all-or-none situation.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this article was supported in part by a Career Development Award (K05-MH1075) from the National Institute of Mental Health to Thomas O. Nelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plude, D.J., Nelson, T.O. & Scholnick, E.K. Analytical research on developmental aspects of metamemory. Eur J Psychol Educ 13, 29–42 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172811

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172811

Key words

Navigation