Skip to main content
Log in

Fish-assemblage dynamics in Malibu Lagoon, a small, hydrologically altered estuary in southern California

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Malibu Lagoon, California, USA, is a small estuary that has been substantially altered by habitat loss and increased freshwater input from development in its watershed. The lagoon’s fish assemblage was sampled at nine stations on 32 occasions between July 1993 and August 1994 on at least a monthly basis using beach seines and fish traps. Thirteen fish species represented by 16,444 individuals were collected. California killifish (Fundulus parvipinnis) was by far the most abundant species, comprising 80% of the total catch. Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) constituted 9% of the catch, and topsmelt (Atherinops affinis) constituted 7%. As with other temperate estuarine fish assemblages, species richness and abundance varied seasonally, with peaks during summer. The majority of fish collected were juveniles, with topsmelt and California killifish recruitment being extremely high during some periods. Fish use of the portion of the lagoon restored as a salt marsh ten years prior to our study was evaluated. Fish species richness, density, and composition in the restored salt marsh were quite similar to those in the main lagoon as well as other natural salt marshes in southern California. Malibu Lagoon’s species richness is low relative to some other southern California wetland systems, particularly large estuaries with uninterrupted tidal flushing, but is comparable to other southern California estuaries with similar hydrology. Despite extensive anthropogenic modification, Malibu Lagoon provides suitable habitat for a variety of fish species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allen, L. G. 1982. Seasonal abundance, composition, and productivity of the littoral fish assemblage in upper Newport Bay, California. Fishery Bulletin 80:769–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L. G. and M. H. Horn. 1975. Abundance, diversity and seasonality of fishes in Colorado Lagoon, Alamitos Bay, California. Estuarine and Coastal. Marine Science 3:371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, R. F., I. H. Suffet, and S. S. Que Hee. 1995. Enhanced environmental monitoring program at Malibu Lagoon and Malibu Creek. Report to the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Calabasas, CA, USA.

  • Bennett, B. A. 1989. A comparison of the fish communities in nearby permanently open, seasonally open and normally closed estuaries in the south-western Cape, South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 8:43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F. and R. E. Turner. 1984. Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7:460–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, J. M. 1993. The physical, chemical and biological monitoring of San Elijo Lagoon. Report to the San Diego County Dept. of Parks and Recreation. Pacific Estuarine Research Laboratory, San Diego State University, San Diego CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattrijsse, A., E. S. Makwaia, H. R. Dankwa, O. Hamerlynck, and M. A. Hemminga. 1994. Nekton communities of an intertidal creek of a European estuarine brackish marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 109:195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, R. H. and R. A. Barnhart. 1993. Early use by fish of a mitigation salt marsh, Humboldt Bay, California. Estuaries 16: 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Los Angeles. 1992. Draft Environmental Impact Report for First Phase Project for Playa Vista Master Plan Project for Playa Vista. Technical Appendices, Volume X. Appendix J: Biotic Resources. Los Angeles, CA, USA. EIR No. 90-0200-SUB©(CUZ)(CUR). State Clearinghouse No. 90010510.

  • Costa, M. J., J. L. Costa, P. R. de Almeida, and C. A. Assis. 1994. Do eel grass beds and salt marsh borders act as preferential nurseries and spawning grounds for fish? An example of the Mira estuary in Portugal. Ecological Engineering 3:187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamradt, S. C. and L. B. Katz. 1997. Effect of introduced crayfish and mosquitofish on California newts. Conservation Biology 10: 1155–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haltiner, J., J. B. Zedler, K. E. Boyer, G. D. Williams, and J. C. Callaway. 1997. Influence of physical processes on the design, functioning and evolution of restored tidal wetlands in California (USA). Wetlands Ecology and Management. 4:73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havens, K. J., L. M. Varnell, and L. G. Bradshaw. 1995. An assessment of ecological conditions in a constructed tidal marsh and two natural reference tidal marshes in coastal Virginia. Ecological Engineering 4:117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, M. H. and L. G. Allen. 1981. Ecology of fishes in upper Newport Bay: seasonal dynamics and community structure. California Department of Fish and Game, Long Beach, CA, USA. Marine Resources Technical Report 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. H., J. Zedler, and D. Fairbanks. 1972. Ecosystem alteration by mosquitofish (Gambasia affinis) predation. Science 175: 639–641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., Jr. 1989. The fishes of Malibe Lagoon. p. 113–139.In B. S. Manion and J. H. Dillingham (eds.) Maliba Lagoon: A Baseline Ecological Survey. Topanga-Las Virgenes Resource Conservation District. Topanga, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, T. J. and J. B. Zedler. 1997. Food web analysis of southern California coastal wetlands using multiple stable isotopes. Oecologia 110:262–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaSalle, M. W., M. C. Landin, and J. G. Sims. 1991. Evaluation of the flora and fauna of aSpartina alterniflora marsh established on dredged material in Winyah Bay, South Carolina. Wetlands 11: 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manion, B. S. 1989. An overview of Malibu Lagoon. p. 1–11.In B. S. Manion and J. H. Dillingham (eds.) Malibu Lagoon: A Baseline Ecological Survey. Topanga-Las Virgenes Resource Conservation District. Topanga, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McErlean, A. J., S. G. O’Connor, J. A. Mihursky, and C. I. Gibson. 1973. Abundance, diversity and seasonal patterns of estuarine fish populations. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 1:19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEC Analytical Systems. Inc. 1991. Anaheim Bay Biological Monitoring Project. Report to the Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.

  • MEC Analytical Systems, Inc. 1993. San Dieguito Lagoon Restoration Project Biological Baseline Study March 1992–May 1993, San Onofre Marine Mitigation Program. Draft Technical Memorandum for Southern California Edison Company, Rosemead, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minello, T. J. and J. W. Webb, Jr. 1997. Use of natural and createdSpartina alterniflora salt marshes by fishery species and other aquatic fauna in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 151:165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minello, T. J. and R. J. Zimmerman. 1992. Utilization of natural and transplanted Texas salt marshes by fish and decapod crustaceans. Marine Ecology Progress Series 90:273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy, L. D. and L. A. Levin. 1991. AreSpartina marshes a replaceable resource? A functional approach to evaluation of marsh creation efforts. Estuaries 14:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordby, C. S. and J. B. Zedler. 1991. Responses of fish and macrobenthic assemblages to hydrologic disturbances in Tijuana Estuary and Los Peñasquitos Lagoon, California. Estuaries 14:80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, C. P., M. L. Quammen, G. P. Shaffer, C. H. Peterson, Chapman, J. W., J. Cermak, and R. W. Holmes. 1978. An analysis of the values of central and southern California coastal wetlands. p. 186–99.In P. W. Greeson, J. R. Clark, and J. F. Clark (eds.) Wetlands Functions and Values: The State of Our Understanding. American Water Resources Association. Minneapolis, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, C. P., and M. L. Quammen. 1983. Fishes in a California coastal lagoon: effects of major storms on distribution and abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 12:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, I. C. and G. A. Hyndes. 1994. Composition of the fish fauna of a permanently open estuary on the southern coast of Australia, and comparisons with a nearby seasonally closed estuary. Marine Biology 121:199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Race, M. S. and M. S. Fonseca. 1996. Fixing compensatory mitigation: what will it take? Ecological Applications 6:94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulifson, R. A. 1991. Finfish utilization of man-initiated and adjacent natural creeks of South Creek Estuary, North Carolina using multiple gear types. Estuaries 14:447–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreffler, D. K., C. A. Simenstad, and R. M. Thom. 1990. Temporary residence by juvenile salmon in a restored estuarine wetland. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:2079–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, C. C., T. R. Haglund, M. Ruiz, and R. N. Fisher. 1993. The status and distribution of the freshwater fishes of southern California. Southern California Academy of Sciences Bulletin 92:101–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. and Philip Williams and Associates, Ltd. 1992. Ventura River Estuary Enhancement: Existing Conditions. Prepared for the City of Buenaventura, California Dept. of Parks and Recreation and California State Coastal Conservancy, San Buenaventura, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT. 1997. Statistics. Version 7.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, J. and J. Shulmeister. 1995. Post-fire sediment movement in Malibu Lagoon with a Post-1995-flood post script. Southern California Academy of Sciences Annual Meeting, Abstracts. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

  • Zedler, J. B. 1982. The ecology of southern California coastal salt marshes: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-81/54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 1996. Coastal mitigation in southern California: the need for a regional restoration strategy. Ecological Applications 6:84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B., G. D. Williams, and J. S. Desmond. 1997. Wetland mitigation: can fishes distinguish between natural and constructed wetlands? Fisheries 22:26–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambrose, R.F., Meffert, D.J. Fish-assemblage dynamics in Malibu Lagoon, a small, hydrologically altered estuary in southern California. Wetlands 19, 327–340 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161764

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161764

Key Words

Navigation