Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in nutria diets in selected freshwater forested wetlands of Louisiana

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutria (Myocastor coypus) diets and food preferences in selected freshwater forested wetlands of Louisiana were determined by microhistological examination of fecal pellets and stomach contents.Lemna minor andSpirodela polyrrhiza (duckweeds) dominated the diet (yearly mean 55.5%) during all seasons on 4 of 6 sites sampled. Nutria also ate substantial amounts of Pontederiaceae (Eichhornia crassipes andPontederia cordata) (9.9%),Alternanthera philoxeroides (8.3%), Poaceae (mostlyPanicum gymnocarpon) (5.1%), and woody tissue (6.8%). Nutria diets varied among seasons, with spring diets containing more Poaceae (P<0.01) and less Pontederiaceae (P<0.01) than during other seasons. Nutria showed seasonal preference forL. minor andS. polyrrhiza (spring and summer), Poaceae (spring),A. philoxeroides (summer and winter), and Cyperaceae (summer and fall). SinceL. minor andS. polyrrhiza dominated nutria diets even when they had relative cover values as low as 16.8%, nutria habitat quality should improve if freshwater forested wetland understories are converted (through natural or anthropogenic forces) to communities dominated by these plant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allredge, J.R. and J.T. Ratti. 1986. Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection. Journal of Wildlife Management 50:157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. G. and N. S. Smith. 1974. Comparison of rumen and fecal analyses to describe deer diets. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:535–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashbrook, F. G. 1948. Nutrias in coastal Louisiana. Proceedings of the Louisiana Academy of Sciences. 19:28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, F. G. 1950. Life history studies of nutria, or coypu, in coastal Louisiana. Journal of Wildlife Management. 14:249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. M. and M. J. Langlinais. 1960. Nutria and swamp rabbit damageTaxodium distichum seedlings. Journal of Forestry 58:388–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, L. E. 1970. Production, mineral accumulation and pigment concentration inTypha latifolia andScirpus americanus. Ecology 51:285–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chabreck, R. H., J. R. Love, and G. Linscombe. 1981. Foods and feeding habits of nutria in brackish marsh in Louisiana. p. 531–543.In J. A. Chapman, and D. Pursley (eds.) Worldwide Furbearer Conference Proceedings, Frostburg, MD, USA.

  • Conner, W. H., J. R. Toliver, and F. H. Sklar. 1986. Natural regeneration of baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) in a Louisiana swamp. Forest Ecology and Management 24:305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, W. H. and J. R. Toliver. 1990. Long-term trends in the bald-cypress (Taxodium distichum) resource in Louisiana (U.S.A.). Forest Ecology and Management 33:543–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. T. and R. P. McIntosh. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytical and synthetic phytosociological characteristics. Ecology 31:433–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. 1970. About nutria and their control. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Resource Publication 86. Denver, CO, USA.

  • Fracker, S. B. and J. A. Brischle. 1944. Measuring the local distribution ofRibes. Ecology 25: 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Free, J. C., Hansen, R. M., and P. L. Sims. 1969. Estimating dry weight of food plants in feces of herbivores. Journal of Range Management 22:300–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainey, L. F. 1949. Comparative winter food habits of the muskrat and nutria in captivity. M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. and H. Bieguszewski. 1960. Die Durchgangszeiten der Nahrung durch den Verdauungskanal der Nutria. Acta Theriologica 4:11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holecheck, J. L. and B. D. Gross. 1982. Training needed for quantifying simulated diets from fragmented range plants. Jourmal of Range Management 35:644–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holecheck, J.L., M. Vavra and R. D. Pieper. 1982. Botanical composition determination of herbivore diets: a review. Journal of Range Management 31:309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluation of resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K. and H. A. Pearson. 1979. Esophygeal, fecal, and exclosure estimates of cattle diets on a longleaf pine-bluestem range. Journal of Range Management 32:275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.K., and H. Wofford, and H. A. Pearson. 1983. Microhistological techniques for food habits analyses. USDA Forest Service Paper SD-199.

  • Kinler, N. W., R. G. Linsombe, and P. R. Ramsey. 1987. Nutria. p. 326–344.In Milan Novak, James A. Baker, Martyn E. Obbard, and Bruce Mallock (eds.) Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America. Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, R. K., D. M. Green, and T. S. Mings. 1989 Nutrient composition of selected emergent macrophytes in Northem. Prairie wetlands. Journal of Range Management. 42:323–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. and R. H. Chabreck. 1974 A survey of fur resources of the Atchafalaya River flood Plain in Louisiana. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fisheries Commissions. 27:157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Trejo, F., D. D. Dwyer, and K. H. Assay 1979. Forage yield, phenological development, and forage quality of anAgropyron repens X A. spicatum Hybrid. Journal of Range Management 32:387–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H. W., R. M. Hansen, and D. G. Reden, 1978 Diets of the Slave River lowland bison herd, Northwest Territories, Canada. Journal of Wildlife Management. 42:581–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. H. and D. H. Amer. 1984. Food habits of beaver in east-central Mississippi. Journal of Wildlife Management. 48:1414–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS 1985. SAS User’s guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, M. G., R. H. Chabreck, and G. Linscombe. 1981. Foods of nutria in fresh marshes of southeastern Louisiana. p. 517–530.In D. A. Chapman and D. Pursley, (eds.), Worldwide Furbearer Conference Proceedings, Frostburg, Maryland, USA.

  • Sklar, F. H. and W. H. Conner. 1979. Effects of altered hydrology on primary production and aquatic animal populations in a Louisiana swamp forest. Proceedings of the Coastal Marsh and Estuary Management Symposium. 3:101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. and L. J. Shandruk. 1979. Comparison of fecal, rumen and utilization methods for ascertaining pronghorn diets. Journal of Range Management. 32:275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, W. G. and J. C. Malecheck. 1968 Estimating percentage dry, weight in diets using a microscope technique. Journal of Range Management. 21:264–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, W. G. and G. A. Petrides. 1954. Establishment and food habits of nutria in Texas. Ecology 35:172–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenneson, C. and L. W. Orring. 1985. Winter food preference of porcupines. Journal of Wildlife Management. 49:28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz, W. A. 1971. The impact of nutria (Myocastor coypus) on marsh vegetation in Willamette Valley, Oregon. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner, G. R., J. A. Chapman, and D. Pursley. 1979 Reproduction, physiological responses, food habits, and abundance of nutria on Maryland marshes. Wildlife Monographs 65:1–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilsey, B.J., Chabreck, R.H. & Linscombe, R.G. Variation in nutria diets in selected freshwater forested wetlands of Louisiana. Wetlands 11, 263–278 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160853

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160853

Key Words

Navigation