Skip to main content
Log in

Ovipositor length of threeApocrypta species: Effect on oviposition behavior and correlation with syconial thickness

  • Entomology
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated oviposition behavior in three non-pollinating fig wasps: the sympatric speciesApocrypta bakeri Joseph onFicus hispida L.,A. westwoodi Grandi onF. racemosa L., andApocrypta sp. onF. semicordata Buch.-Ham. The oviposition behavior differs significantly between one pair of species (A. bakeri andA. westwoodi) and the other species (Apocrypta sp. onF. semicordata).A. bakeri andA. westwoodi were similar in the following aspects: the posture of the abdomen and the action of the hind legs before penetration, and the bending ovipositor sheath during penetration. In contrast, the oviposition behavior ofApocrypta sp. is quite different. This difference can be explained by the significant correlation between ovipositor length and syconial thickness.Apocrypta sp. has a shorter ovipositor than the two other species, which correlates with the thinner syconial wall of its host figF. semicordata. It is deduced that the ovipositor length adapts to the syconial thickness and induces the oviposition behavior in the different species to diverge. For all threeApocrypta species, the midleg length and hindleg length are significantly correlated with their ovipositor lengths. This may be explained as due to the fact that body movement adjusting the hindlegs and midlegs up and down, or forward and backward, is also influenced by the ovipositor length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdurahiman, U.C. (1980) Observations on the oviposition behaviour inPhilotrypesis pilosa Mayr (Torymidae: Hymenoptera).Proc. Symp. Environmental Biology (Trivandrum, India), pp. 146–150.

  2. Abdurahiman, U.C. and Joseph, K.J. (1979) Observation on the oviposition behaviour inApocrypta bakeri Joseph (Torymidae: Hymenoptera).J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 76: 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ansari, M.H. (1967) The process of egg laying in Idarninae (Chalcidoidea: Hymenoptera).Indian J. Entomol. 29: 380–384.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Compton, S.G. and McLaren, F.A.C. (1989) Respiratory adaptations in some male fig wasps.Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet 92: 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galil, J. and Eisikowitch, D. (1968) On the pollination ecology ofFicus sycomorus in East Africa.Ecology 49: 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galil, J. and Meiri, L. (1981) Number and structure of anthers in fig syconia in relation to behaviour of the pollen vectors.New Phytol. 88: 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jousselin, E. and Kjellberg, F. (2001) The functional implications of active and passive pollination in dioecious figs.Ecol. Lett. 4: 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerdelhue, C. and Rasplus, J.-Y. (1996) Non-pollinating Afrotropical fig wasps affect the fig-pollinator mutualism inFicus within the subgenusSycomorus.Oikos 75: 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Machado, C.A., Jousselin, E., Kjellberg, F., Compton, S.G. and Herre, E.A. (2001) Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 268: 685–694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Molbo, D., Machado, C.A., Sevenster, J.G., Keller, L. and Herre, E.A. (2003) Cryptic species of figpollinating wasps: implications for the evolution of the fig-wasp mutualism, sex allocation, and precision of adaptation.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100: 5867–5872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramirez, B.W. (1974) Coevolution ofFicus and Agaonidae.Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 61: 770–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. SAS (1992) SAS User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ulenberg, S.A. (1985) The Systematics of the Fig Wasp Parasites of the GenusApocrypta Coquerel. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Noort, S. and Compton, S.G. (1996) Convergent evolution of agaonine and sycoecine (Agaonidae, Chalcidoidea) head shape in response to the constraints of host fig morphology.J. Biogeogr. 23: 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiblen, G.D. (2002) How to be a fig wasp.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 299–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiblen, G.D. (2004) Correlated evolution in fig pollination.Syst. Biol. 53: 128–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. West, S.A., Herre, E.A., Windsor, D.M. and Green, P.R.S. (1996) The ecology and evolution of the New World non-pollinating fig wasp communities.J. Biogeogr. 23: 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Da-Wei Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhen, WQ., Huang, DW., Xiao, JH. et al. Ovipositor length of threeApocrypta species: Effect on oviposition behavior and correlation with syconial thickness. Phytoparasitica 33, 113–120 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029967

Key Words

Navigation