Skip to main content
Log in

A new look at euclid’s second proposition

  • Article
  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

We mention in closing that even the 20th-centuryAlgorithm CO pales by comparison withAlgorithm Euclid from the point of view of robustness with respect to singularities. Consider, for example, the case where point C happens to lie at a location equidistant fromA andB. Algorithm Euclid executes in this case as easily as in any other because everything is well-defined. Without special flag-waving code, however,Algorithm CO could crash attempting to draw a circle with radius zero and then intersecting two circles, one of which has radius zero.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Aho, J. E. Hopcroft, and J. D. Ullman,The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1974.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Avron, Theorems on strong constructibility with a compass alone,J. Geometry 30 (1987), 28–35.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Avron, Construction problems—why and how?Int. J. Educ. Sci. Technol. 20 (No. 2) (1989), 273–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Avron, On strict constructibility with a compass alone,J. Geometry, 38 (1990), 12–15.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Barrow,Euclide’s Elements, London: E. Redmayne, 1705.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Beckman,A History of Pi, New York: The Golem Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. L. L. Busard,The First Latin Translation of Euclid’s Elements Commonly Ascribed to Adelard of Bath, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1983.

  8. H. L. L. Busard,The Latin Translation of the Arabic Version of Euclid’s ElementsCommonly Ascribed to Gerard de Cremona, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. H. L. L. Busard,The Medieval Latin Translation of Euclid’s ElementsMade Directly From the Greek, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GMBH, 1987.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Clavio,Euclidis Elementorum, Francofurti: Jonae Rosae, 1654.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Courant and H. Robbins,What is Mathematics? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Dunham,Journey Through Genius: The Great Theorems of Mathematics, New York: Wiley, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. E. J. Dijksterhuis,The First Book of Euclid’s Elementa, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. S. Hall and F. H. Stevens,A Text-Book of Euclid’s Elements, London: Macmillan and Co., 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sir T. L. Heath,The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. L. Heiberg,Euclidis Elementa, Lipsiae: B. G. Teubneri, 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Honsberger,Ingenuity in Mathematics, New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibn al-Haytham,On the Resolution of Doubts in Euclid’s Elements and Interpretation of Its Special Meanings, University of Istanbul, 1041 A.D., facsimile edition published by the Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. J. Kayas,Euclide: Les Elements, Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Klein,Elementary Mathematics from an Advanced Standpoint: Geometry, New York: Dover, 1939.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Kostovskii,Geometrical Constructions with Compasses Only, Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Lardner,The First Six Books of the Elements of Euclid, London: H. G. Bohn, 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Lemoine,Géométrographie, Paris: C. Naud, 1902.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. L. Mascheroni,The Geometry of Compasses, Pavia: University of Pavia, 1797.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Mohr,The Danish Euclid, Amsterdam, 1672.

  26. G. R. Morrow,Proclus: A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Pedoe,Geometry and the Liberal Arts, New York: Penguin Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Peyrard,Les Oeuvres D’Euclide, Traduites Littéralement, Paris: C. F. Patris, 1819.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Playfair,Elements of Geometry; Containing the First Six Books of Euclid, Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute, 1831.

    Google Scholar 

  30. F. P. Preparata and M. I. Shamos,Computational Geometry: An Introduction, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. B. Russell,The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. E. Stark and R. C. Archibald, Jacob Steiner’s geometrical constructions with a ruler given a fixed circle with its center (translated from the German 1833 edition),Scripta Mathematica, 14 (1948), 189–264.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. H. Smith,Elements of Geometry, London: Rivingtons, 1879.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. S. Smogorzhevskii,The Ruler in Geometrical Constructions, New York: Blaisdell, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H. M. Taylor,Euclid’s Elements of Geometry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  36. I. Todhunter,The Elements of Euclid, Toronto: Copp, Clark & Co., 1876.

    Google Scholar 

  37. G. T. Toussaint, Computational geometric thinking as kinesthetic thinking, presented at Conference on Thinking, Harvard University, August 1984.

  38. R. Williams,Elements of Euclid Explained and Demonstration in a New and Most Easy Method, London: Globemaker, 1703.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toussaint, G. A new look at euclid’s second proposition. The Mathematical Intelligencer 15, 12–24 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024252

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024252

Keywords

Navigation