Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weed control, an important practice in agroecosystems to protect crop production, is usually achieved with herbicides. However, these pesticides are expensive, pose potential risks to the environment, may affect some beneficial organisms indirectly, and decrease overall arthropod biodiversity, including pests and their natural enemies, by removing weeds that might act as hosts or shelters for many organisms. The activity density response of important surface-dwelling arthropod predators (ground beetles [Coleoptera: Carabidae], ants [Hymenoptera: Formicidae] and spiders [Arachnida: Araneae]) to herbicides (trifluralin and paraquat), and to two alternative weed management practices (rye straw mulch and mechanical treatment to maintain weeds below threshold levels, in comparison with an untreated check), was assessed using pitfall traps. The mulch treatment had the greatest effect on activity density, reducing the number of predators trapped significantly (P<0.05). Herbicide use resulted in significant (P<0.05) reductions in the activity density of ground beetles. Most predators were trapped in the check plots — which had the highest weed biomass, followed in turn by numbers trapped in the threshold weed control treatment, the full herbicide application and the mulch treatment plots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, J.B. (1960) Effects of spraying 2,4-D amine on coccinellid larvae.Can. J. Zool. 38:285–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, J.B. and Drew, M.E. (1965) Grain aphids in New Brunswick. III. Aphid populations in herbicide-treated oat fields.Can. J. Zool. 43:789–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Agnello, A.M., Van Duyn, J.W. and Bradley, J.R. Jr. (1986) Influence of postemergence herbicides on populations of bean leaf beetle,Cerotoma trifurcata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and corn earworm,Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in soybeans.J. Econ. Entomol. 79:261–265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahn, Y.J., Kim, Y.J. and Yoo, J.K. (2001) Toxicity of the herbicide glufosinate-ammonium to predatory insects and mites ofTetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) under laboratory condiditions.J. Econ. Entomol. 94:157–161.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boiteau, G. (1984) Effect of planting date, plant spacing, and weed cover on populations of insects, arachnids, and entomophthoran fungi in potato fields.Environ. Entomol. 13:751–756.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, K.C., Lawton, J.H. and Shires, S.W. (1983) Effects of insecticides on invertebrate predators and their cereal aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) prey: Laboratory experiments.Environ. Entomol. 12:1747–1750.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brust, G.E. (1990) Direct and indirect effects of four herbicides on the activity of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).Pestic. Sci. 30:309–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiverton, P.A. (1984) Pitfall-trap catches of the carabid beetlePterostichus melanarius, in relation to gut contents and prey densities, in insecticide treated and untreated plots in spring barley.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 36:23–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cottrell, T.E. and Yeargan, K.V. (1998) Influence of a native weed,Acalypha ostryaefolia (Euphorbiaceae), onColeomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) population density, predation, and cannibalism in sweet corn.Environ. Entomol. 27:1375–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon, P.L. and McKinlay, R.G. (1992) Pitfall trap catches of aphid predation byPterostichus melanarius andPterostichus madidus in insecticide treated and untreated potatoes.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 64:63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards, C.A. (1991) Long term ecological effects of herbicides: field studies.Brighton Crop Protection Conf. — Weeds, pp. 883–890.

  12. Edwards, C.A., Huelsman, M.F., Yardım, E.N. and Shuster, W.D. (1996) Cultural inputs into integrated crop management and minimizing losses of processing tomatoes to pests in the U.S.Brighton Crop Protection Conf. — Pests and Diseases. 6C-2, pp. 597–602.

  13. Edwards, C.A. and Stratford, C.J. (1979) Interactions between herbicides and the soil fauna.Ann. Appl. Biol. 47:125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards, C.A. and Thompson, A.R. (1973) Pesticides and the soil fauna.Residue Rev. 45:1–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elsen, T. (2000) Species diversity as a task for organic agriculture in Europe.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 77:101–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haughton, A.J., Bell, J.R., Wilcox, A. and Boatman, N.D. (2001) The effect of glyphosate on non-target spiders: Part I. Direct effects onLepthyphantes tenuis under laboratory conditions.Environ. Entomol. 30:1017–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ingram, J.W., Bynum, E.K. and Charpentier, L.J. (1947) Effect of 2,4-D on sugarcane borer.J. Econ. Entomol. 40:745–746.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masiunas, J.B., Weston, L.A. and Weller, S.C. (1995) The impact of rye cover crops on weed populations in a tomato cropping system.Weed Sci. 43:318–323.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maxwell, R.C. and Harwood, R.F. (1960) Increased reproduction of pea aphids on broad beans treated with 2,4-D.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53:199–205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ofuya, T.I. (1989) Effects of weeds on colonization of cowpea byAphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its major predators.Trop. Pest Manage. 35:403–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Powell, W., Dean, G.J. and Dewar, A. (1985) The influence of weeds on polyphagous arthropod predators in winter wheat.Crop Prot. 4:298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rieux, R., Simon, S. and Defrance, H. (1999) Role of hedgerows and ground cover management on arthropod populations in pear orchards.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 73:119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stam, P.A., Clower, D.F., Graves, J.B. and Schilling, P.E. (1978) Effects of certain herbicides on some insects and spiders found in Louisiana cotton fields.J. Econ. Entomol. 71:477–480.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Subagja, J. and Snider, R.J. (1981) The side effects of the herbicides atrazine and paraquat uponFalsomia candida andTullbergia granulata (insecta, Collembola).Pedobiologia 22:141–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sulkava, P. and Huhta, V. (1998) Habitat patchiness affects decomposition and faunal diversity: a microcosm experiment on forest floor.Oecologia 116:390–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weaver, S.E., Smits, N. and Tan, C.S. (1987) Estimating yield losses of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) caused by nightshade (Solanum spp.) interference.Weed Sci. 35:163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wyss, E. (1996) The effects of artificial weed strips on diversity and abundance of the arthropod fauna in a Swiss experimental apple orchard.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 60:47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yardım, E.N. and Edwards, C.A. (1998) [The influence of chemical pest, disease and weed management practices on soil-dwelling arthropod fauna in tomato agroecosystems.]Proc. 14th Biology Congr. (Samsun, Turkey), vol. 3, pp. 205–214 (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdal N. Yardım.

Additional information

http://www.phytoparasitica.org posting July 10, 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yardım, E.N., Edwards, C.A. Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems. Phytoparasitica 30, 379–386 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979685

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979685

Key words

Navigation