Skip to main content
Log in

Managed bioremediation of soil contaminated with crude oil soil chemistry and microbial ecology three years later

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysis of samples taken from three experimental soil lysimeters demonstrated marked long-term effects of managed bioremediation on soil chemistry and on bacterial and fungal communities 3 yr after the application of crude oil or crude oil and fertilizer. The lysimeters were originally used to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of managed (application of fertilizer and water, one lysimeter) vs unmanaged bioremediation (one lysimeter) of Michigan Silurian crude oil compared to one uncontaminated control lysimeter. Three years following the original experiment, five 2-ft-long soil cores were extracted from each lysimeter, each divided into three sections, and the like sections mixed together to form composited soil samples. All subsequent chemical and microbiological analyses were performed on these nine composited samples. Substantial variation was found among the lysimeters for certain soil chemical characteristics (% moisture, pH, total Kjeldahl nitrogen [TKN], ammonia nitrogen [NH4-N], phosphate phosphorous [PO4-P], and sulfate [SO4 −2]). The managed lysimeter had 10% the level of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-IR) found in the unmanaged lysimeter. Assessment of the microbial community was performed for heterotropic bacteria, fungi, and aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria (toluene, naphthalene, and phenanthrene) by dilution onto solid media. There was little difference in the number of heterotrophic bacteria, in contrast to counts of fungi, which were markedly higher in the contaminated lysimeters. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria were elevated in both oil-contaminated lysimeters. In terms of particular hydrocarbons as substrates, phenanthrene degraders were greater in number than naphthalene degraders, which outnumbered toluene degraders. Levels of sulfate-reducing bacteria seem to have been stimulated by hydrocarbon degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cole, E., Bartolina, D., and Swafford, T. (1977), Soil Survey of Tulsa County, OK, US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, p. 140.

  2. Fisher, J. B. and King, G. (1994), Monitoring of Hydrocarbon Bioremediation Progress with Microtox, Amoco Production Co. Report 940870004-APR.

  3. Rodina, A. G. (1972),Methods in Aquatic Microbiology, University Park Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duncan, K., Levetin, E., Wells, H. et al. Managed bioremediation of soil contaminated with crude oil soil chemistry and microbial ecology three years later. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 63, 879–889 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920484

Index Entries

Navigation