Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting tissue distribution of heavy metals

Age effects and the metal concentration patterns in common terns,Sterna hirundo

  • Body Status from Trace Elements in Blood, Urine, Skin, and Hair
  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal distribution in an organism at any one time is a resultant of many extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Improved analytic methodology has made it feasible to obtain highly sensitive determinations for many metals in a single sample. Thus, it is now feasible to examine patterns of metal distribution. We report on a study of the effect of age on metal patterns in the common tern,Sterna hirundo, a fisheating seabird. We contrast the levels of nine metals in the liver of adult and young terns and compared these with levels in tern eggs. Unlike many previous studies, adults did not have significantly higher levels of metals, although for most metals, levels in eggs were significantly lower than liver levels of young and adults. The intermetal correlations showed more significant positive correlations for adults and eggs than for chicks, the latter showing instead a correlational chaos, probably reflecting the immaturity of their physiologic defense mechanisms and the absence of dynamic equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Eskildsen and P. Grandjean,Toxicol. Lett. 21, 225 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. D. Hoffman and R. D. Curnow,J. Wildl. Manage. 43, 85 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. B. W. Cain, L. Sileo, J. C. Franson, and J. Moore,Environ. Res. 32, 286 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. US EPAInterim Methods for the Sampling and Analysis of Priority Pollutants in Sediments and Fish Tissues, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. A. Bache, W. H. Gutenmann, and D. J. Lisk,Science 172, 951 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Gochfeld and J. Burger,Colonial Waterbirds 5, 116 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NAS (1975),Nickel, Committee on Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. R. Himmelhoch, H. A. Sober, B. L. Vallee, E. A. Peterson, and K. Fuwa,Biochemistry 5, 2523 (1966).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. C. Cotzias and P. S. Papavasiliou,Nature 195, 823 (1962).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. D. Luckey, B. Venugopal, and D. Hutcheson,Heavy metal toxicity, safety and hormology, George Thieme, Stuttgart (1983), p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hulse, J. S. Mahoney, G. D. Schroder, C. S. Hacker, and S. M. Pier,Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 9, 65 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. L. Maedgen, C. S. Hacker, G. D. Schroder, and F. W. Weir,Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 11, 88 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. M. Howarth, A. J. Hulbert, and D. Horning,Austral. Wildlif. Res. 8, 665 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Hutton,Environ. Pollut. 26, 129 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gochfeld, M., Burger, J. Factors affecting tissue distribution of heavy metals. Biol Trace Elem Res 12, 389–399 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796695

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796695

Index Entries

Navigation