Abstract
Leutenegger and Cheverud (1982, 1985) propose a hypothesis to explain why larger primates are more sexually dimorphic in body weight and canine size. Their hypothesis states that any factor selecting for an evolutionary increase in body size will produce an increase in sexual dimorphism in any character if either heritability or phenotypic variability is greater in males than in females for that character. They cite no evidence for heritability but give some data to suggest that males are, in fact, more variable than females. We test the latter proposition more fully using measurements on the dentitions of platyrrhine primates. Male and female phenotypic variances are not significantly different in most cases. Cases of greater male phenotypic variance are not limited to sexually dimorphic species. We conclude that the hypothesis of Leutenegger and Cheverud does not explain the observed patterns of dental sexual dimorphism, at least in platyrrhines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. M., and Leutenegger, W. (1985). The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analysis: Sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates.Evolution 39(6): 1335–1351.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H., and Rudder, B. (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates.Nature (London) 269: 797–800.
Gaulin, S., and Sailer, L. (1984). Sexual dimorphism in weight among primates: The relative impact of allometry and sexual selection.Int. J. Primatol. 5: 515–535.
Harvey, P., Kavanagh, M., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1978). Sexual dimorphism in primate teeth.J. Zool. (London) 180: 15–34.
Kay, R. F., Plavcan, J. M., Glander, K. E., and Wright, P. C. (1987). Behavioral and size correlates of canine dimorphism in platyrrhine primates.Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 72:218.
Kay, R. F., Plavcan, J. M., Glander, K. E., and Wright, P. C. (1988). Sexual selection and canine dimorphism in New World primates.Am. J. phys. Anthropol. (in press).
Leutenegger, W. (1982). Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body weight and canine size in primates.Folia primatol. 37: 163–176.
Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. M. (1982). Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: Ecological and size variables.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 387–402.
Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. M. (1985). Sexual dimorphism in primates: The effects of size. In Jungers, W. L. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 33–50.
Leutenegger, W., and Kelly, J. T. (1977). Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates.Primates 18: 117–136.
Leutenegger, W., and Larson, S. (1985). Sexual dimorphism in the postcranial skeleton of New World primates.Folia primatol. 44: 82–95.
Mahler, P. E. (1973).Metric Variation in the Pongid Dentition, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Oxnard, C. E., Lieberman, S. S., and Gelvin, B. R. (1985). Sexual dimorphisms in dental dimensions of higher primates.Am. J. Primatol. 8: 127–152.
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed., W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Swindler, D. R. (1976).The Dentition of Living Primates, Academic Press, New York.
Wood, B. A. (1976). The nature and basis of sexual dimorphism in the primate skeleton.J. Zool. (London) 180: 15–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plavcan, J.M., Kay, R.F. Sexual dimorphism and dental variability in platyrrhine primates. Int J Primatol 9, 169–178 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737399
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737399