Skip to main content
Log in

Field calibration of soil-core microcosms: Fate of a genetically altered rhizobacterium

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microcosms containing intact soil-cores are a potential tool for assessing the risks of the release of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) to the environment. Before microcosms become a standard assessment tool, however, they must first be calibrated to ensure that they adequately simulate key parameters in the field. Four systems were compared: intact soil-core microcosms located in the laboratory at ambient temperature and in a growth chamber with temperature fluctuations that simulated average conditions in the field, field lysimeters, and field plots. These four systems were inoculated with rifampicin-resistantPseudomonas sp. and planted to winter wheat. Populations of thePseudomonas sp. in soil decreased more rapidly at ambient temperature, but population size at the three-leaf stage of wheat growth was the same in all four systems. Populations of thePseudomonas sp. on the rhizoplane of wheat were the same at the three-leaf stage in all four systems, and colonization with depth at the final boot stage-sampling was also similar. In general, microcosms incubated at ambient temperature in the laboratory or in the growth chamber were similar to those in the field with respect to survival of and colonization of the rhizoplane by the introducedPseudomonas sp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bentjen SA, Fredrickson JK, Li SW, Van Voris P (1989) Intact soil-core microcosms for evaluating the fate and ecological impacts from the release of genetically engineered microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:198–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beringer JE, Bale MJ (1988) The survival and persistence of genetically-engineered microorganisms. In: Sussman M, Collins CH, Skinner FA, Stewart-Tull DE (eds) The release of genetically-engineered micro-organisms. Academic Press, London, pp 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolton H Jr, Elliott LF (1989) Toxin production by a rhizobacterialPseudomonas sp. that inhibits wheat root growth. Plant Soil 114:269–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolton H Jr, Elliott LF, Gurusiddaiah S, Fredrickson JK (1989) Characterization of a toxin produced by a rhizobacterialPseudomonas sp. that inhibits wheat growth. Plant Soil 114: 279–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton H Jr, Fredrickson JK, Thomas JM, Li SW, Workman DW, Bentjen SA, Smith JL (1991) Field calibration of soil-core microcosms: Ecosystem structural and functional comparisons. Microb Ecol 21:175–189

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brockman FJ, Forse LB, Bezdicek DF, Fredrickson JK (1991) Impairment of transposon-induced mutants ofRhizobium leguminosarum. Soil Biol Biochem (in press)

  7. Cairns J, Pratt JR (1986) Ecological consequence assessment: Effects of bioengineered organisms. In: Fiksel J, Covello VT (eds) Biotechnology risk assessment, issues and methods for environmental introductions. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 88–108

    Google Scholar 

  8. Compeau G, Al-Achi BJ, Platsouka E, Levy SB (1988) Survival of rifampin-resistant mutants ofPseudomonas fluorescens andPseudomonas putida in soil systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2432–2438

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean-Ross D (1986) Release of genetically engineered microorganisms: Hazard assessment. ASM News 11:572–575

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fredrickson JK, Bentjen SA, Bolton H Jr, Li SW, Van Voris P (1989) Fate of Tn5 mutants of root growth-inhibitingPseudomonas sp. in intact soil-core microcosms. Can J Microbiol 35:867–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fredrickson JK, Bolton H Jr, Bentjen SA, McFadden KM, Li SW, Van Voris P (1990) Nutrient efflux from intact soil-core microcosms for evaluating the impacts of genetically engineered microorganisms on ecological processes. Environ Tox Chem 9:551–558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fredrickson JK, Elliott LF (1985) Colonization of winter wheat roots by inhibitory rhizobacteria. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1172–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fredrickson JK, Elliott LF (1985) Effect on winter wheat seedling growth by toxin producing rhizobacteria. Plant Soil 83:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fredrickson JK, Elliott LF, Engibous JC (1987) Crop residues as substrate for host-specific inhibitory pseudomonads. Soil Biol Biochem 19:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fredrickson JK, Van Voris P, Bentjen SA, Bolton H Jr (1990) Terrestrial microcosms for evaluating the environmental fate and risks associated with the release of chemicals or genetically engineered microorganisms to the environment. Hazard Assess Chem-Curr Develop 7:157–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gile JD, Collins JC, Gillett JW (1982) Fate and impacts of wood preservatives in a terrestrial microcosm. J Agric Food Chem 30:295–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillett JW, Witt JM (1979) Terrestrial microcosms. In: Proceedings of the workshop at Otter Rock and Portland, OR, June and December 1977. NSF/RA-790034, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Howie WJ, Cook RJ, Weller DM (1987) Effects of soil matric potential and cell motility on wheat root colonization by fluorescent pseudomonads suppressive to take-all. Phytopathology 77:286–292

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nesmith WC, Jenkins SF Jr (1983) Survival ofPseudomonas solanacearum in selected North Carolina soils. Phytopathology 73:1300–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Omenn GS (1986) Controlled testing and monitoring methods for microorganisms. In: Fiksel J, Covello VT (eds) Biotechnology risk assessment, issues and methods for environmental introductions. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 144–163

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pritchard PH, Bourquin AW (1984) The use of microcosms for evaluation of interactions between pollutants and microorganisms. Adv Microb Ecol 7:133–217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rickard WH, Vaughan BE (1988) Plant community characteristics and responses. In: Rickard WH, Rogers LE, Vaughan BE, Liebetrau SF (eds) Shrub-steppe: Balance and change in a semiarid terrestrial ecosystem. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sands DC, Rovira AD (1970) Isolation of fluorescent pseudomonads with a selective medium. Appl Microbiol 20:513–514

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sivasithamparam K, Parker CA, Edwards CS (1979) Rhizosphere microorganisms of seminal and nodal roots of wheat grown in pots, Soil Biol Biochem 11:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stone WA, Thorp JM, Gifford OP, Hoitink DJ (1983) Climatological summary for the Hanford area. PNL-4622, UC-11, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strauss HS, Hattis D, Page G, Harrison K, Vogel S, Caldert C (1986) Genetically-engineered microorganisms: II. Survival, multiplication, and genetic transfer. RAC Tech Bull 9:16–28

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stroo HF, Elliott LF, Papendick RI (1988) Growth, survival and toxin production of root-inhibitory pseudomonads on crop residues. Soil Biol Biochem 20:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trevors JT (1988) Use of microcosms to study genetic interactions between microorganisms. Microbiol Sci 5:132–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Elsas JD, Dijkstra AF, Govaert JM, van Veen JA (1986) Survival ofPseudomonas fluorescens andBacillus subtilis introduced into two soils of different texture in field microplots. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 38:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Voris P (1988) Standard guide for conducting a terrestrial soil-core microcosm test. Standard E 1197. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, vol. 11.04. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 743–755

    Google Scholar 

  32. Van Voris P, Tolle DA, Arthur MF (1983) Experimental terrestrial soil-core microcosm test protocol. A method for measuring potential ecological effects, fate, and transport of chemicals in terrestrial ecosystems. EPA/600/3-85/047, PNL-5450, Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Voris P, Tolle DA, Arthur MF, Chesson J (1985) Terrestrial microcosms: Application validation, and cost-benefit analysis. In: Cairns J (ed) Multispecies toxicity testing, Pergamon Press, New York, pp 117–142

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weller DM (1984) Distribution of a take-all suppressive strain ofPseudomonas fluorescens on seminal wheat roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:897–899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolton, H., Fredrickson, J.K., Bentjen, S.A. et al. Field calibration of soil-core microcosms: Fate of a genetically altered rhizobacterium. Microb Ecol 21, 163–173 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02539151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02539151

Keywords

Navigation