Skip to main content
Log in

Recovery of memory in chicks after disruption during learning: The reversibility of amnesia induced by protein synthesis inhibitors

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein synthesis inhibitors given during learning are known to disrupt memory in various animal species in several models of learning. However, there are suggestions that amnesia induced by protein synthesis inhibitors is not permanent-memory can be recovered by a reminder procedure, i.e., by presenting the animal with one of the components of the external environment which was part of the learning situation. The aim of the present work was to determine the existence of the reminder phenomenon in a well-studied model of single-session training to passive avoidance in chicks. Cycloheximide and anisomycin were used to induce amnesia. Reminder was performed using the aversive taste of methylanthranilate 24 h afte training, and testing was conducted 48 h after training. The results obtained provide evidence that memory disrupted by protein synthesis inhibitors in chicks can be recovered by the reminder procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. K. Anokhin, “Foreword,” in: K. V. Sudakov, Biological Motivation, Meditsina, Moscow (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. K. Anokhin, “Systems analysis of integrative neuron activity,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk,5, 5–92 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. V. Anokhin, “Molecular scenarios for the consolidation of long-term memory,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,47, 262–286 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. P. Ashmarin, “Molecular mechanisms of neurological memory,” in: Mechanisms of Memory [in Russian], G. A. Vartanyan (responsible editor), Nauka, Leningrad (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. I. Kruglikov, “On the reminder phenomenon,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,21, 419–422 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. I. Kruglikov, “The neurochemical mechanisms of memory,” in: Mechanisms of Memory [in Russian], G. A. Vartanyan (responsible editor), Nauka, Leningrad (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. M. Alberini, M. Ghirardi, Y. Y. Huang, P. V. Nguyen, and E. R. Kandel, “A molecular switch for the consolidation of long-term memory: cAMP-inducible gene expression,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,758, 261–286 (1995).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. J. Andrew, “Drug administration,” in: Behavioural and Neural Plasticity: the Use of the Domestic Chick as a Model, R. J. Andrew (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Burchuladze and S. P. R. Rose, “Memory formation in day-old chicks requires NMDA but not a non-NMDA glutamate receptors,” Eur. J. Neurosci.,4, 1–5 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Cherkin, “Kinetics of memory consolidation: role of amnestic treatment parameters,” Proc. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,63, 1094–1101 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Cherkin, “Retrograde amnesia in the chick: resistance to the reminder effect,” Physiol. Behav.,8, 949–955 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Cherkin and M. W. Garman, “Ontogeny of the peck response in chicks: age dependence and target dependence,” Behav. Biol.,21, 128–133 (1977).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. P. Davis and L. R. Squire, “Protein synthesis and memory: a review,” Psychol. Bull.,96, 518–559 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. DeZazzo and T. Tulli, “Dissection of memory formation: from behavioral pharmacology to molecular genetics,” Trends Neurosci.,18, 212–218 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Dragunow, “A role for immediate-early transcription factors in learning and memory,” Behav. Genetics,26, 293–299 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Goelet, V. F. Castellucci, S. Schacher, and E. R. Kandel, “The long and the short of long-term memory—a molecular framework,” Nature,322, 419–422 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Holscher and S. P. R. Rose, “Inhibiting protein synthesis of the putative retrograde messenger nitric oxide results in amnesia in a passive avoidance task in chick,” Brain,619, 189–194 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Jork, G. Grecksch, and H. Matthies, “Impairment of hippocampal glycoprotein fucosylation—consequences on memory function,” in: Learning and Memory Mechanisms of Information Storage in the Nervous System, H. Matthies (ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Landmesser, “Synaptic plasticity. Fastening synapses by adhesion,” Current Biol.,7, 28–30 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. J. Lewis, J. R. Misanin, and R. R. Miller, “Recovery of memory following amnesia,” Nature,220, 704–705 (1968).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Matthies, “In search of cellular mechanisms of memory,” Prog. Neurobiology,32, 277–349 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Mileusnic, K. Anokhin, and S. P. R. Rose, “Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides toc-fos are amnestic for passive avoidance in the chick,” Neuroreport,7, 1268–1272 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. T. Ng and M. E. Gibbs, “Studies in memory formation: a review,” in: Behavioural and Neural Plasticity: the Use of the Domestic Chick as a Model, R. J. Andrew (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. A. Patterson, M. C. Alvarado, I. T. Warner, E. L. Bennett, and M. R. Rosenzweig, “Memory stages and brain asymmetry in chick learning,” Behav. Neurosci.,100, 856–865 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. D. Quartermain, B. S. McEwen, and E. C. Azmitia, “Amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock or cycloheximide: conditions for recovery,” Science,169, 683–686 (1970).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Quartermain, B. S. McEwen, and E. C. Azmitia, “Recovery of memory following amnesia in the rat and mouse,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psych.,79, 360–370 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. P. R. Rose, “How chicks make memories: the cellular cascade fromc-fos to dendritic remodeling,” Trends Neurosci.,14, 390–397 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. S. P. R. Rose, “Biochemical mechanisms involved in memory formation in the chick,” in: Behavioural and Neural Plasticity: the Use of the Domestic Chick as a Model, R. J. Andrew (Ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. P. R. Rose, “Cell adhesion molecules and the transition from short- to long-term memory,” J. Physiol. (Paris),90, 387–391 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. P. A. Serrano, W. A. Rodriguez, E. L. Bennett, and M. R. Rosenzweig, “Protein kinase inhibitors disrupt memory formation in two chick brain regions,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.,52, 547–554 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. J. Steel and M. G. Stewart, “7-Chlorokynurenate, an antagonist of the glycine binding site on the NMDA receptor, inhibits memory formation in day old chicks (Gallus domesticus),” Behav. Neural Biol.,60, 89–92 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. W. Zhao, P. Bennet, G. L. Sedman, and K. T. Ng, “The impairment of long-term memory formation by the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid,” Brain Res. Bull.,36, 557–561 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. L. Squire and P. Alvarez. “Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: a neurobiologicla perspective,” Current Opinion in Neurobiol.,5, 169–177 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Zinkin and A. J. Miller, “Recovery of memory after amnesia induced by electroconvulsive shock,” Science,155, 102–104 (1967).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 83, No. 11-12, pp. 11–18, November–December, 1997.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radyushkin, K.A., Anokhin, K.V. Recovery of memory in chicks after disruption during learning: The reversibility of amnesia induced by protein synthesis inhibitors. Neurosci Behav Physiol 29, 31–36 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461355

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461355

Key Words

Navigation