Abstract
Technologists working in informal educational settings must adapt instructional design models to special needs. This article describes the analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation of an interactive videodisc exhibit at a natural history museum. Advantages of using an existing videodisc are discussed and design requirements for museum environments and interactive videodisc-based exhibits are examined. Data are presented suggesting that systematically designed videodisc exhibits can attract and hold visitors' attention for longer periods of time than conventional exhibits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, B.S. (1986). A theoretical framework for interactivating linear video.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 13, 107–112.
American Association of Museums (1992).Excellence and equity: education and the public dimension of museums (ISBN 0-931201-14-4). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
Binder, R.H. (1987, April). Special report: museum applications of videodisc.The Videodisc Monitor, 1-A-1-D.
Bruman, R. (1975).Exploratorium cookbook I: A consortium manual for exploratorium exhibits. San Francisco, CA: The Exploratorium.
Clowes, M. & Wolff, L. (1980, November).A preliminary evaluation of the “Birds of Canada” exhibit. Ottawa, Canada: Ottawa Museum of Natural Sciences.
Diamond, J., Bond, A., & Hirumi, A. (1989). Desert exploration—A videodisc exhibit designed for flexibility.Curator, 32(3), 161–173.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990).The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Falk, J.H. (1983). The use of time as a measure of visitor behavior and exhibit effectiveness.Roundtable Reports: The Journal of Museum Education, 7(4), 10–13.
Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1988).Principles of instructional design. (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hipschman, R. (1980).Exploratorium cookbook II: A construction manual for exploratorium exhibits. San Francisco, CA: The Exploratorium.
Hipschman, R. (1987).Exploratorium cookbook III: A construction manual for exploratorium exhibits. San Francisco, CA: The Exploratorium.
Konikow, R.B. (Ed.). (1984).Exhibit design. New York, NY: PBC International.
Konikow, R.B.. (Ed.). (1986).Exhibit design 2. New York, NY: PBC International.
Koran, J.J., Jr., Foster, J.S., & Koran, M.L. (1989). The relationship among interest, attention and learning in a natural history museum.Curator, 31(2), 36–43.
Koran, J.J., Jr., Koran, M.L., Dierking, L.D., & Foster, J.S. (1988). Using modeling to direct attention in a natural history museum.Curator, 31(2), 36–43.
Koran, J.J., Jr., Koran, M.L., & Longino, S.J. (1986). The relationship of age, sex, attention and holding power with two types of science exhibits.Curator, 29(3), 227–235.
Kulhavy, R.W., Schwartz, N.H., & Peterson, S. (1986). Working memory: The encoding process. In B. Phye & T. Andres (Eds.),Cognitive classroom learning, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Linn, M.C. (1981, April).Evaluation in museum settings: Focus on expectations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Morrissey, K. (1991). Visitors' behavior and interactive video.Curator, 34(2), 109–118.
Nash, C.J. (1992). Interactive media in museums: Looking backwards, forwards, and sideways.Museum Management and Curatorship, 11, 171–184.
Neal, A. (1976).Exhibits for small museums: A handbook. Nashville, TN: American Association for State and Local History.
Oppenheimer, R. (1986). Exhibit conception and design.The Exploratorium, 5–28.
Peart, B. (1984). Impact of exhibit type on knowledge gain, attitudes, and behavior.Curator, 27(3), 220–237.
Popham, W.J. (1975).Educational evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rossett, A. (1987).Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Screven, C.G. (1990). Computers in exhibit settings. In S. Bitgood, A. Benefield, & D. Patterson (eds.),Visitor studies: Theory, research, and practice. Proceedings of the 1990 Visitors Studies Conference. Jacksonville, Alabama: The Center for Social Design. 131–138.
Shettel, H.H. (1973). Exhibits: Art form or educational medium.Museum News, 52(1), 32–41.
Van Rennes, E.C. (1981).Exhibits enhanced by stand alone computers. Bloomfield Hills: Cranbrook Institute of Science.
Wittlin, A. (1968). Exhibits: Interpretive, uninterpretive, misinterpretive—absolutes in exhibit techniques. In E. Larabee (Ed.)Museums and education. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Wolf, R.L., & Tymitz, B. (1978).A preliminary guide for conducting naturalistic evaluations in studying museum environment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Zyskowski, G. (1981, October).How not to conduct a naturalistic evaluation: Rueful reminiscences of a museum evaluator. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Evaluation Network, Austin, TX.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Alan Bond, Judith Diamond, the staff of the San Diego Natural History Museum, and anonymous reviewers in design of this exhibit and preparation of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirumi, A., Savenye, W. & Allen, B. Designing interactive videodisc-based museum exhibits: A case study. ETR&D 42, 47–55 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298170
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298170