Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity analysis of structural equation models

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the sensitivity analysis of structural equation model when minor perturbation is introduced. Some influence measure that based on the general case weight perturbation is derived for the generalized least squares estimation. An influence measure that related to the Cook's distance is also developed for the special case deletion perturbation scheme. Using the proposed methodology, the influential observation in a data set can be detected. Moreover, the general theory can be applied to detect the influential parameters in a model. Finally, some illustrative artificial and real examples are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckman, R. J., & Cook, R. D. (1983). Outliers.Technometrics, 25, 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1983). Some contribution to efficient statistics for structural models: Specification and estimation of moment structures.Psychometrika, 48, 493–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1992).EQS: Structural Equation Program Manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least squares estimators in analysis of covariance structures.South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance Structures. In D. M. Hawkins (Ed.),Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D. (1979). Influential observations in linear regression.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D. (1986). Assessment of local influence (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 48, 133–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D., and Weisber, S. (1982).Residuals and influence in regression. New York and London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, F. (1985). Influence in principal component analysis.Biometrika, 72, 627–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1987).Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, T. L. (1969).Growth study annotated bibliograph (Progress Report 69-11). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. S. (1981).Robust statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMSL (1991).FORTRAN Subroutines for statistical analysis. Houston, TX: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., & Geisser, S. (1983). A predictive view of the detection and characterization of influential observations in regression analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices.Psychometrika, 43, 443–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988).LISREL IIV: A Guide to the program and applications, Chicago, IL: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. V., & Felson, A. E. (1978). Sensitivity analysis of arbitrary identified simultaneous-equation models.Sociological Methods and Research, 6(3), 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E. (1984). Global sensitivity results for generalized least squares estimate.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 867–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1979).Multivariate analysis. Academic Press.

  • Pack, P., Jolliffe, I. T., & Morgan, B. J. T. (1988). Influential observations in principal component analysis: A case study.Journal of Applied Statistics, 15, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasek, W. (1984). Regression diagnostics for general linear regression models.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 336–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y. (1988). Sensitivity analysis in principal component analysis: Influence on the subspace spanned by principal component.Communications in Statistics, Series A, 17, 3157–3175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y., & Odaka, Y. (1989a). Influential observations in principal factor analysis.Psychometrika, 54, 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y., & Odaka, Y. (1989b). Sensitivity analysis in maximum likelihood factor analysis.Communications in Statistics, Series A, 18, 4067–4084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y., & Watadani, S. (1992). Sensitivity analysis in covariance structure analysis with equality constraints.Communications in Statistics, Series A, 21, 1501–1515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y., Watadani, S., & Inoue, K. (1992). Sensitivity analysis in structural equation models. In Y. Dodge & J. Whitterker (Eds.), COMPSTAT 1992Physica-Verlag, 1, 493–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y., Watadani, S., & Moon, S. H. (1991). Influence in covariance structure analysis: With an application to confirmatory factor analysis.Communications in Statistics, Series A, 20, 3805–3821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watadani, S., & Tanaka, Y. (1994). Statistical software SACS—Sensitivity analysis in covariance structure analysis.Technical Report of Okayama Statistical Association, 58.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research of the first author was supported by a Hong Kong UPGC grant. The authors are greatly indebted to two reviewers for some very valuable comments for improvement of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, SY., Wang, S.J. Sensitivity analysis of structural equation models. Psychometrika 61, 93–108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296960

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296960

Key words

Navigation