Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence analysis of structural equation models with polytomous variables

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The estimation of model parameters in structural equation models with polytomous variables can be handled by several computationally efficient procedures. However, sensitivity or influence analysis of the model is not well studied. We demonstrate that the existing influence analysis methods for contingency tables or for normal theory structural equation models cannot be applied directly to structural equation models with polytomous variables; and we develop appropriate procedures based on the local influence approach of Cook (1986). The proposed procedures are computationally efficient, the necessary bits of the proposed diagnostic measures are readily available following an usual fit of the model. We consider the influence of an individual cell frequency with respect to three cases: when all parameters in an unstructured model are of interest, when the unstructured polychoric correlations are of interest, and when the structural parameters are of interest. We also consider the sensitivity of the parameters estimates. Two examples based on real data are presented for illustration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E.B. (1992). Diagnostics in categorical data analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 781–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, R.J., Nachtsheim, C.J., & Cook, R.D. (1987). Diagnostics for mixed-model analysis of variances.Technometrics, 29, 413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.D. (1986). Assessment of local influence (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 48, 133–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A. (1970).Introduction to differential geometry. Reading, M.A.: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E.J. (1978).The distribution of living conditions: Main results from the welfare survey (in Danish). Copenhagen: Teknisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix.Psychometrika, 59, 381–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrance, A.J. (1988). Regression transformation diagnostics using local influence.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1067–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.Y., Poon, W.Y., & Bentler, P.M. (1990). A three-stage estimation procedure for structural equation models with polytomous variables.Psychometrika, 55, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.Y., Poon, W.Y., & Bentler, P.M. (1995). A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.Y., & Wang, S.J. (1996). Sensitivity analysis of structural equation models.Psychometrika, 61, 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators.Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M.D., & Bentler, P.M. (1988).Consequences of adolescent drug usse: Impact on the lives of young adults. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon, W.Y., & Lee, S.Y. (1987). Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate polychoric correlation coefficients.Psychometrika, 52, 409–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. (1997). Local influence in principal component analysis.Biometrika, 84, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Laurent, R.Y., & Cook, R.D. (1993) Leverage, local influence and curvature in nonlinear regression.Biometrika, 80, 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, J.J. (1969).Differential geometry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y., Watadani, S., & Moon, S.H. (1991). Influence in covariance structure analysis: with an application to confirmatory factor analysis.Communications in Statistics, Series A, 20, 3805–3821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W., & Cook, R.D. (1990). Assessing influence on predictions in generalized linear models.Technometrics, 32, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong

    Wai-Yin Poon, Shu-Jia Wang & Sik-Yum Lee

Authors
  1. Wai-Yin Poon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shu-Jia Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sik-Yum Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wai-Yin Poon.

Additional information

The work described in this paper was partially supported by a Chinese University of Hong Kong Postdoctoral Fellows Scheme and a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (RGC Ref. No. CUHK4186/98P). We are indebted to P.M. Bentler and M.D. Newcomb for providing the data set, Michael Leung for his assistance, and the Editor and the referees for some very valuable comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poon, WY., Wang, SJ. & Lee, SY. Influence analysis of structural equation models with polytomous variables. Psychometrika 64, 461–473 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294567

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294567

Key words

Search

Navigation