Abstract
This paper discusses and compares the methods of attitude scale construction of Thurstone (method of equal-appearing intervals), Likert (method of summated ratings), and Guttman (method of scale analysis), with special emphasis on the latter as one of the most recent and significant contributions to the field. Despite a certain lack of methodological precision, scale analysis provides a means of evaluating the uni-dimensionality of a set of items. If the criteria for uni-dimensionality are met, the interpretation of rank-order scores is made unambiguous, and efficiency of prediction from the set of items is maximized. The Guttman technique, however, provides no satisfactory means of selecting the original set of items for scale analysis. Preliminary studies indicated that both the Likert and the Thurstone methods tend to select scalable sets of items and that their functions in this respect are complementary. A method of combining the Likert and Thurstone methods in order to yield a highly scalable set of items is outlined. Sets of 14 items selected by the method have, in the two cases where the technique has been tried, yielded very satisfactory scalability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamic, L. A nation of nations. New York: Harpers, 1945.
Drake, St. C., & Cayton, H. R. Black metropolis. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1945.
Edwards, A. L., & Kenney, K. C. A comparison of the Thurstone and Likert techniques of attitude scale construction.J. appl. Psychol., 1946,30, 72–83.
Edwards, A. L. A critique of “neutral” items in attitude scales constructed by the method of equal appearing intervals.Psychol. Rev., 1946,53, 159–169.
Edwards, A. L. On Guttman's scale analysis.Educ. psychol. Meas. In press.
Edwards, A. L., & Kilpatrick, F. P. The scale-discrimination method for measuring social attitudes.J. appl. Psychol. In press.
Ferguson, L. W. A study of the Likert technique of attitude scale construction.J. soc. Psychol., 1941,13, 51–57.
Festinger, L. The treatment of qualitative data by “scale analysis.”Psychol. Bull., 1941,44, 149–161.
Guttman, L. A basis for scaling qualitative data.Amer. sociol. Rev., 1944,9, 139–150.
Guttman, L., & Suchman, E. A. Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis.Amer. sociol. Rev., 1947,12, 57–67.
Guttman, L. The desire of enlisted men for post-war full-time schooling: an example of a scale. Research Branch, Information and Education Division, Army Service Forces, Survey 63-E.
Guttman, L. Questions and answers about scale analysis. Research Branch, Information and Education Division, Army Service Forces, Report D-2, 1945.
Guttman, L. The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis. Mimeographed, 1946.
Guttman, L. On Festinger's evaluation of scale analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1947,44, 451–465.
Likert, R. Technique for the measurement of attitudes.Arch. Psychol., 1932, No. 140, 55 pp.
Thurstone, L. L. & Chave, E. J. The measurement of attitude. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1929.
Thurstone, L. L. & Peterson, R. C.Scale for the measurement of attitude toward capital punishment: Form A. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1931.
Thurstone, L. L.Scale for the measurement of attitude toward communism: Form B. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1931.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edwards, A.L., Kilpatrick, F.P. Scale analysis and the measurement of social attitudes. Psychometrika 13, 99–114 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289081
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289081