Skip to main content
Log in

Digital movement analysis, a new objective method of measuring tardive dyskinesia and drug-induced parkinsonian tremor: acceptability, reliability and validity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital movment analysis (DMA) is a new instrumental approach to assessing oral tardive dyskinesia (TD) by means of digital image processing of a video signal, tracking five paper dots placed around the patient's mouth. A total of 40 schizophrenic patients, 30 with and 10 without TD, were examined twice (with a 3-month interval) with this new device. The patients were further examined with two TD rating scales: the St. Hans Rating Scale for extrapyramidal syndromes (SHRS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).

The schizophrenic patients accepted the instrumental assessment without any anxiety or resistance. The internal relibility of the apparatus was high, with correlation coefficients of 0.80–0.99. The DMA TD values correlated with the SHRS and AIMS scores with correlation coefficients of 0.48–0.73 indicating an acceptable, although not strong, concurrent validity. Fluctuations occurred from the first to the second examination independent of medication. For these fluctuations no correlation was found between DMA values and rating scores. Finally, the DMA device was able to detect perioral tremor as a sign of parkinsonism.

It has been concluded that DMA is a useful supplement to classical TD rating, although further validity evaluation is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III-R), 3rd edn, revised. American Psychiatric Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchel C, Leon J de, Simpson GM, Gattaz WF (1995) Oral tardive dyskinesia: validation of a measuring device using digital image processing. Psychopharmacology 117:162–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney C, Casey DE (1975) An objective method for measuring dyskinetic movements in tardive dyskinesia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 38:645–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Fann WE, Stafford JE, Malone RL et al (1977) Clinical research techniques in tardive dyskinesia. Am J Psychiatry 134:759–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardos G, Cole JO, LaBrie R (1977) The assessments of tardive dyskinesia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 34:1206–1212

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattaz WF, Büchel C (1993) Assessment of tardive dyskinesia by means of digital image processing. Psychopharmacology 111:278–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach J (1979) Tardive dyskinesia. Danish Med Bull 26:209–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach J, Casey DE (1988) Tardive dyskinesia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 77:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach J, Korsgaard S, Clemmesen P et al. (1993) The St. Hans Rating Scale for extrapyramidal syndromes. Reliability and validity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 87:244–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Greil W, Haag H, Rossnagl G, Rüther E (1984) Effect of anticholinergics on tardive dyskinesia. A controlled discontinuation study. Br J Psychiatry 145:304–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy W (1976) Assessment manual for psychopharmacology. In: US Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, ECDEU, Washington, DC, pp 534–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeste CV, Caligiuri MP (1993) Tardive dyskinesia. Schizophr Bull 19:303–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Jus K, Jus A Villeneuve A (1973) Polygraphic profile or oral tardive dyskinesia and the rabbit syndrome. Dis Nerv Syst 34:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane JM, Smith JM (1982) Jardive dyskinesia, prevalence and risk factors, 1959 to 1979. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39:473–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay SR, Opler LA, Lindenmayer JP (1989) The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): rationale and standardisation. Br J Psychiatry 155 (Suppl 7):59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Khot V, Wyatt RJ (1991) Not all that moves is tardive dyskinesia. Am J Psychiatry 148:661–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorring L von, Lindström E (1992) The Swedish version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Construct validity and interrater reliability. Acta Psychiatr Scand 86:463–468

    Google Scholar 

  • May PRA, Lee MA, Bacon RC (1983) Quantitative assessments of neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms: Clinical and nonclinical approaches. Clin Neuropharmacol 6 (Suppl):35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri S, Colter N, Resek G (1990) Ultrasonic measurements of tardive dyskinesia and drug induced changes in oro-facial movements. Eur J Psychiatry 4:105–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Resek G, Haines J, Sainsbury P (1981) An ultrasound technique for the measurements of tardive dyskinesia. Br J Psychiatry 138:474–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GM, Lee JH, Zuobok B et al. (1979) A rating scale for tardive dyskinesia. Psychopharmacology 64:171–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nilsson, F.M., Hansen, B.L., Büchel, C. et al. Digital movement analysis, a new objective method of measuring tardive dyskinesia and drug-induced parkinsonian tremor: acceptability, reliability and validity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 246, 71–77 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274896

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274896

Key words

Navigation