Skip to main content
Log in

The relations of generative concern and generative action to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examined the relations that generative concern and generative action have to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development. Generative concern is a general personality tendency or interest in caring for younger and anticipated individuals, while generative action addresses actual physical behaviors that promote the well-being of future generations. Two samples (79 and 152 adults) were employed. Generative concern scores were significantly related to scores for extraversion, openness, emotional stability (non-neuroticism), and agreeableness as well as to two agentic traits (achievement, dominance) and two communal traits (affiliation, nurturance). Generative action was significantly related to extraversion and openness. Generative concern but not generative action was found, as predicted, to be positively related to one's life satisfaction/happiness. Further, one's level of ego development determined, in part, the relation that generative concern had to satisfaction/happiness with life. Given that a subject scored high in ego development, his or her level of satisfaction/happiness varied as a function of generative concern such that those who scored low on generative concern were significantly less satisfied/happy than those that scored high on generative concern. The results are discussed within the context of the recently proposed theory of generativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S. A., Russell, C. S., & Schumm, W. R. (1983). Perceived marital quality and family life cycle categories: A further analysis.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1991).Meanings in life. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1973).The denial of death. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swindler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1991).The good society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (1975).Generative man: Psychoanalytic perspectives. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. (1989). Personality as traits.American Psychologist, 44, 1378–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J. J. (1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait-multimethod-multi-occasion analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1266–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985a). Concurrent validation after 20 years: Implications of personality stability for its assessment. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 31–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985b).The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in Adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual review of psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 417–440). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1987). The dream specimen of psychoanalysis. In S. Schlein (Ed.),A way of looking at things: Selected papers from 1930 to 1980 Erik H. Erikson. New York: Norton. (Work originally published inThe Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2, 5–56.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1958).Young man Luther: A study in psychoanalysis and history. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1963).Childhood and society. (2nd ed). New York: Norton. (Work originally published in 1950.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1964).Insight and responsibility. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1969).Gandhi's truth: On the origins of militant nonviolence. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1975).Life history and the historical moment. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E.H. (1982).The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: The three major dimensions of personality.Journal of Personality, 58, 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N. D., & McLanahan, S. (1982). Children and marital happiness: A further specification of the relationship.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, S. T. (1976). Loevinger's model and measure of ego development: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin, 80, 928–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, G. A. (1986).Construction and validation of an Eriksonian measure of psychosocial development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

  • Jackson, D. N. (1974).The Personality Research Form. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1976).Jackson Personality Inventory manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, E. (1965). Death and the midlife crisis.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 46, 502–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In D. M. Buss and N. Cantor (Eds.),Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. Pervin (Ed.),Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotre, J. (1984).Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., & Snarey, J. (1988). The relationship between ego and moral development: A theoretical review and empirical analysis. In D. K. Lapsely & F. C. Power (Eds.),Self, ego, and identity: Integrative approaches (pp. 151–178). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1974). The sense of immortality: On death and the continuity of life. In R. J. Lifton (Ed.),Explorations in Psychohistory (pp. 271–287). New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1979).The broken connection: On death and the continuity if life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1966). The meaning and development of ego development.American Psychologist, 21, 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1976).Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1979). Construct validity of the sentence completion test of ego development.Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 281–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1983). On ego development and the structure of personality.Developmental Review, 3, 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1984). On the self and predicting behavior. In R. A. Zucker, J. Aronoff, & A. I. Rabin (Eds.),Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 43–68). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1985). Revision of the sentence completion test for ego development.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 420–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1987).Paradigms of personality. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, H. Z. (1971).Occupation: Housewife. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1985).Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1994).The person: An introduction to personality psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., Diamond, A., de St. Aubin, E. & Mansfield, E. (1995).Stories of commitment: The psychosocial construction of generative lives. Manuscript under revision.

  • McAdams, D. P., Ruetzel, K., & Foley, J. M. (1986). Complexity and generativity at mid-life: A study of biographical scripts for the future.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 800–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography.Journal of Personality and Social and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults.Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the five factor model: Joint analyses of the NEO-PI with other instruments. In D. M. Buss and N. Cantor (Eds.),Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five factor model of personality across instruments and observers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938).Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestor, T. (1988).Celibacy and generativity. Unpublished master's thesis, Loyola University, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Towards an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochse, R., & Plug, C. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson's theory of personality development.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1240–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1990). Using personal and fictional documents to assess psychosocial development: A case study of Vera Brittain's generativity.Psychology and Aging, 5, 400–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1994).Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. J. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory.Psychological Reports, 45, 590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. J. (1981). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity.Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmore, C., & Waldman, K. (1975). Reliability of a sentence completion measure of ego development.Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszanafszky, J. (1981). The relationship of level of ego development to Q-sort personality ratings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Heincke, S. G. (1983). Subjective organization of personality in adulthood and aging.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 807–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Migdal, S. (1984). Intimacy and generativity: Self perceived transitions.Signs, 9, 470–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • de St. Aubin, E. (1992, May). Generative commitment: Its role within personality, its measurement, and its relation to the concern, action and narration components of generativity. In E. de St. Aubin (Chair),Emerging perspectives in adult personality development: Research concerning generativity. Symposium conducted at the Midwestern Psychological Convention, Chicago.

  • Stewart, A. J., Franz, C., & Layton, L. (1988). The changing self: Using personal documents to study lives.Journal of Personality, 56, 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E. (1977).Adaptation to life. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E. (1993).The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E., & Milofsky, E. (1980). The natural history of male psychological health: IX. Empirical evidence for Erikson's model of the life cycle.American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1348–1359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Water, D. (1987).Present and future in generativity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Water, D., & McAdams, D. P. (1989). Generativity and Erikson's “belief in the species.”Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 435–449.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aubin, E.d.S., McAdams, D.P. The relations of generative concern and generative action to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development. J Adult Dev 2, 99–112 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251258

Key words

Navigation