Skip to main content
Log in

Modulation of drug reinforcement by behavioral requirements following drug ingestion

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eight volunteers with histories of drug abuse participated in two experiments examining the modulation of drug choice by behavioral requirements following drug ingestion. Each morning subjects ingested colorcoded capsules containing triazolam (0.25 mg),d-amphetamine (15 mg), or placebo and then engaged in a relaxation or a computer vigilance activity. Experiment 1 involved two phases (i.e. a triazolam and ad-amphetamine phase), presented in counterbalanced order. Within each phase, subjects were first exposed to each of two compounds (placebo and either triazolam ord-amphetamine) once with each activity. Then every other day for 20 days subjects chose which compound they ingested with the vigilance and relaxation activities, with the restriction that they could not choose the same compound with both activities. Seven of eight subjects reliably chosed-amphetamine with the vigilance activity; all subjects always chose triazolam with the relaxation activity. In experiment 2 (5 days' duration), after re-exposure to the color-coded compounds used in experiment 1, subjects chose which compound (placebo,d-amphetamine or triazolam) they ingested with the vigilance activity, and on another occasion (in counterbalanced order), which they ingested with relaxation activity. Seven of eight subjects chosed-amphetamine with the vigilance activity; all subjects chose triazolam with the relaxation activity. The relaxation and vigilance activities modulated triazolam andd-amphetamine reinforcement, thereby demonstrating a new class of environmental variable that can influence drug self-administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azrin NH (1961) Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science 133:382–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton P (1990) Medium isn't accurate ‘ice age’ message. JAMA 263:2717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falk JL, Samson HH, Winger G (1972) Maintenance of high concentration of blood ethanol and physical dependence in the rat. Science 177:811–813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (1975) Über coca. In: Byck R (ed) Cocaine papers by Sigmund Freud. Meridian, New York, pp 48–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg SR, Woods JH, Schuster CR (1969) Morphine: conditioned increases in self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Science 166:1306–1307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Henningfield JE (1980a) Similarities in animal and human drug-taking behavior. In: Mello NK (ed) Advances in substance abuse. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 1–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson I, Kaliszak JE (1980b) Drug preference in humans: double-blind choice comparison of pentobarbital, diazepam and placebo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 215:649–661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holand L (1990) All about “ice”: New drug nice kids can get hooked on. Good Housekeeping 210:215

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1981) Animal models of drug self-administration. In: Mello NK (ed) Advances in substance abuse: behavioral and biological research. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 219–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner MA (1989) The fire of ‘ice’. Newsweek 114:37

    Google Scholar 

  • McKearney JW (1968) Maintenance of responding under a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock presentation. Science 160:1249–1251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse WH, Mead RN, Kelleher RT (1967) Modulation of elicited behavior by a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock presentation. Science 157:215–217

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Koon M (1989) Dangerous new drugs on the teen market. Good Housekeeping 208:235

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickens R, Meisch RA, Thompson T (1978) Drug self-administration: an analysis of the reinforcing effects of drugs. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology. Plenum, New York pp 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Spealman RD (1979) Behavior maintained by termination of a schedule of self-administered cocaine. Science 204:1231–1233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner SS, Beer B, Shaffer MM (1968) Escape from self-produced rates of brain stimulation. Science 163:90–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretch R, Orloff ER, Dalrymple SD (1968) Maintenance of responding by fixed-interval schedule of electric shock presentation in squirrel monkeys. Science 162:583–586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Yokel RA, de Wit H (1976) Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats. Science 191:1273–1275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young AM, Herling S (1986) Drugs as reinforcers: studies in laboratory animals. In: Goldberg SR, Stolerman IT (eds) Behavior analysis of drug dependence. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 9–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of these data were presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Atlanta, June, 1991

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, K., Kirby, K.C. & Griffiths, R.R. Modulation of drug reinforcement by behavioral requirements following drug ingestion. Psychopharmacology 114, 243–247 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244844

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244844

Key words

Navigation