Abstract
Field farming ofGracilaria is gradually replacing use of the wild crop in Chile. The most popular planting method consists of establishing underground thallus systems for patches ofGracilaria on wave-sheltered, soft-bottom habitats. Commercial cultivation often involves transplanting vegetative material to distant places along the coast. This study shows that native populations possess some ecological differences that might affect cultivation success. Seven environmental factors were tested for their effects on growth of four geographically separated populations belonging to two species ofGracilaria. No specific or population differences were found under various temperature or salinity regimes. Specific differences occurred in responses to irradiance, daylength, sand burial and sand abrasion. Responses to epiphytes differed among both population and species. Epiphyte recruitment was inhibited by some populations and stimulated by others. Given the farming methods presently used in Chile, these results have ecological and economical importance, as they suggest that transplanting randomly from one to other type of habitat does not assure cultivation success.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chapman ARO (1986) Population and community ecology of seaweeds. In: Blaxter JHS, Southward AJ (eds), Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 23. Academic Press, London, 1–161.
Conover JT, Sieburth JMcN (1966) The effects of tannins excreted from Phaeophyta on planktonic animals surviving in tide pools. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 5: 99–100.
Díaz M (1986) Cultivo y explotación deGracilaria en la II Región, Chile. Un análisis crítico. En K. Alveal (ed.), Memorias Seminario Taller Manejo y Cultivo deGracilaria en Chile. pp. 71–101 (no indication of publisher).
Durako MJ, Dawes CJ (1980) A comparative seasonal study of two populations ofHypnea musciformis from the east and west coast of Florida, U.S.A. I. Growth and Chemistry. Mar. Biol. 59: 151–156.
Espinoza J, Chapman ARO (1983) Ecotypic differentiation ofLaminaria longicruris in relation of seawater nitrate concentration. Mar. Biol. 74: 213–218.
Gerard VA (1988) Ecotypic differentiation in light-related traits of the kelpLaminaria saccharina. Mar. Biol. 97: 25–36.
Johnstone IM (1978) Phenotypic plasticity inDraparnaldia (Chaetophoraceae). II. Physical environment and conclusions. Am. J. Bot. 65: 608–614.
Jordan AJ, Vadas RL (1972) Influence of environmental parameters on intraspecific variation inFucus vesiculosus. Mar. Biol. 14: 248–252.
Littler MM, Littler DL (1983) Heteromorphic life history strategies in the brown algaeScytosiphon lomentaria (Lyngb.) Link. J. Phycol. 19: 425–431.
Lünning K (1980) Control of algal life-history by day-length and temperature. Syst. Assoc. spec. vol. 17(6): 915–945.
Markham JW, Newroth PR (1973) Observations on the ecology ofGymnogongrus linearis and related species. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 7: 127–130.
Peckol P, Ramus J (1985) Physiological differentiation of North Carolina nearshore and offshore populations ofSargassum filipendula C. Ag. Bot. Mar. 28: 319–325.
Pizarro A (1986) Conocimiento actual y avances recientes sobre el manejo y cultivo deGracilaria en Chile. Monografías Biológicas 4: 63–96.
Pizarro A, Barrales H (1986) Field assessment of two methods for planting the agar-containing seaweed,Gracilaria, in northern Chile. Aquaculture 59: 31–43.
Ponce F (1987) Evaluación del desarrollo de las actividades pesqueras para cultivo deGracilaria. En Libro de Programas y Resúmenes, I Congreso Latinoamericano de Ficología Marina y III Symposium sobre algas marinas chilenas. Universidad de Concepción, Chile, pp. 74.
Romo H, Alveal K, Delarrosa V (1979) Biología deGracilaria verrucosa (Hudson) Papenfuss en Chile central. In: Santelices B (ed.), Actas del Primer Symposium sobre Algas Marinas Chilenas. Subsecretaría de Pesca, Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción, Santiago, Chile, pp. 155–163.
Santelices B, Camus P, Hoffmann AJ (1989) Ecological studies for harvesting and culturingGymnogongrus furcellatus (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales) in central Chile. J. appl. Phycol. 1: 171–181.
Santelices B, Doty MS (1989) A review ofGracilaria farming. Aquaculture 78: 95–133.
Santelices B, Fonck E (1979) Ecología y cultivo deGracilaria lemaneiformis en Chile central. In: Santelices B (ed.), Actas del Primer Symposium sobre Algas Marinas Chilenas. Subsecretaría de Pesca, Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción, Santiago, Chile, pp. 165–200.
Santelices B, Ugarte R (1987) Production of ChileanGracilaria: problems and perspectives. Hydrobiologia 151/152: 295–299.
Santelices B, Vasquez J, Ohme U, Fonck E (1984) Managing wild crops ofGracilaria in central Chile. Hydrobiologia 116/117: 77–89.
SERNAP (1988) Anuario estadístico de pesca. Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción. Servicio Nacional de Pesca, Santiago, Chile.
Sokal RR, Rohlf J (1981) Biometry. Freeman Press, San Francisco, 776 pp.
Westermeier R, Steubing L, Rivera PJ, Wenzel H (1984)Gracilaria verrucosa (Hudson) Papenfuss en X Región (Maullín y Quenuir. Prov. de Llanquihue). Chile. Mem. Asoc. Latinoam. Acuicult. 5: 419–430.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Presented at the XIIIth International Seaweed Symposium, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, August 1989.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santelices, B., Ugarte, R. Ecological differences among Chilean populations of commercialGracilaria . J Appl Phycol 2, 17–26 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179765
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179765