Skip to main content
Log in

When not to analyze data: Decision making on missing responses in dual scaling

  • Data Analysis: Progress And Recent Trends
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In exploratory data analysis, handling of missing responses requires special considerations because of the absence of a model for them. This study investigates effects of missing responses on dual scaling results, in particular a practical decision rule when to and not to impute for missing responses. More specifically, three questions are asked: when to discard a subject, when to exclude a variable, and when to stop data analysis entirely. The decision rule is based on the concept of substantial discrepancy in the scaling outcome between the “best” and “worst” imputations for missing responses. This problem is discussed in the context of the current knowledge on missing responses in data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. H. Ahn, Effects of missing responses in multiple choice data on dual scaling results, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto (1991), unpublished.

  2. J.-P. Benzècri et al.,L'Analyse des Données. vol. 2:L'Analyse des Correspondances (Dunod, Paris 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Chan. Treatment of missing responses by optimal scaling, Master of Art's Thesis, University of Toronto (1978), unpublished.

  4. A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird and D.B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion), J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B, 39 (1977) 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.L. Ford, An overview of hot deck procedures. in:Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, Vol. 2,Theory and Annotated Bibliography, eds. W.G. Madow, I. Olkin and D.B. Rubin (Academic Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Gifi,Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Guttman, The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction, in:The Prediction of Personal Adjustment, ed. the Committee on Social Adjustment (Social Science Research Council, New York, 1941) pp. 319–348.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Guttman, The principal components of scale analysis, in:Measurement and Prediction, eds. S.A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E.A. Suchman, P.F. Lazarsfeld, S.A. Star and J.A. Clausen (Princeton University Press, 1950).

  9. P. Horst, Measuring complex attitudes. J. Social Psychol. 6 (1935) 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Inukai, Optimal versus partially optimal scaling of polychotomous items. University of Toronto Master's Thesis (1972).

  11. T. Komazawa,Suryoka Riron to Data Short (Quantification Theory and Data Analysis) (Asakura Shoten, Tokyo, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.V. Mardia, J.T. Kent and J.M. Bibby,Multivariate Analysis (Academic Press, New York 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Nishisato, Optimal scaling of paired comparison and rank order data: an alternative to Guttman's formulation, Psychometrika 43 (1978) 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Nishisato,Analysis of Categorical Data Dual Scaling and Its Applications (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Nishisato, Dual scaling of successive categories data, Japan. Psychol. Res. 22 (1980) 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Nishisato, Forced classification: a simple application of a quantification method, Psychometrika 49 (1984) 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Nishisato, Recent developments in dual scaling, Paper presented at a Meeting held at the Industrial Products Research Institute. Tsukuba, Japan (1989).

  18. S. Nishisato, Standardizing multidimensional space for dual scaling,Proc. 20th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Operations Research, Stuttgart, Germany (1991).

  19. S. Nishisato, H. Ahn and A. Shin, Number of options for multiple-choice questions, paper presented at the annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Los Angeles (1989).

  20. S. Nishisato and D.L. Lawrence, Dual scaling of multiway date matrices, in:Multiway Data Analysis, eds. R. Coppi and S. Bolasco (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Nishisato and R. Levine, Optimal scaling of omitted responses, Paper presented at the Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, Iowa (1975).

  22. S. Nishisato and I. Nishisato,An Introduction to Dual Scaling (MicroStats, Toronto, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Nishisato and W. Sheu, A note on dual scaling of successive categories data, Psychometrika 49 (1984) 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Orchard and M.A. Woodbury, A missing information principle: theory and applications.Proc. 6th Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol.1 (The University of California Press, Berkeley, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Takane, Analysis of categorizing behavior by a quantification method, Behaviormetrika 8 (1980) 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. van Buuren and J.L.A. van Rijckevorsel, Fast least squares imputation of missing data, Leiden Psychological Reports: Psychometrics and Research Methodology PRN 01-91 (1991).

  27. R.D. Bock, Methods and applications of optimal scaling, The University of North Carolina Psychometric Laboratory Research Memorandum No. 25 (1960).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishisato, S., Ahn, H. When not to analyze data: Decision making on missing responses in dual scaling. Ann Oper Res 55, 361–378 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02030867

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02030867

Keywords

Navigation