Skip to main content
Log in

Male courtship success and female discrimination in the mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mating success of individually marked male Mediterranean fruit flies was monitored over 6 consecutive days in the laboratory. Mating frequency was nonrandom, as the numbers of both males that failed to mate and males that mated many (more than four) times were much higher than expected by chance alone. Differential mating success resulted in part from intermale variation in activity level. Male copulatory success was positively correlated with the numbers of courtships performed, attempted copulations (mountings), and females courted. Male-male aggression, on the other hand, and a negligible effect on male mating success. Female choice also appeared to influence male mating frequency. Fewer than 10% of courtships resulted in mating, and in most cases females terminated courtship by simply moving away from the male. Females that did mate generally selected males having higher copulatory scores than previously rejected males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apollonio, M., Festa-Bianchet, M., and Mari, F. (1989). Correlates of copulatory success in a fallow deer lek.Ecol. Sociobiol. 25 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arita, L. H. (1979).The Mating Competitiveness and Quality Control of the Laboratory Reared Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis capitata(Wiedemann), Unpublished M.S. thesis. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arita, L. H., and Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1982). Reproductive and sexual maturity of the Mediterranean fruit fly,Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann).Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 24 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arita, L. H., and Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1985). The dynamics of the lek system and mating success in males of the Mediterranean fruit fly,Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann).Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 25 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arita, L. H., and Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1986). Structure and function of the rectal epithelium and anal glands during mating behavior in the Mediterranean fruit fly male.Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 26 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arita, L. H., and Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1989). Sexual selection and lek behavior in the Mediterranean fruit fly,Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae).Pac. Sci. 43 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C. R. B. (1989). Correlations between courtship success, aggressive success, and body size in a picture winged fly,Drosophila silvestris.Ethology 80 318–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia, G. (1979). Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.),Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York, pp. 19–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T. (1983). Behavioral ecology of mating in the Caribbean fruit fly,Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae).Fla. Entomol. 66 330–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feron, M. (1962). L'instinct de reporduction chez la mouche mediterranean des fruitsCeratitis capitata Wied. (Diptera: Trypetidae). Comportement sexuel. Comportement de ponte.Rev. Path. Veg. Entomol. Agr. Fr. 41 1–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrichs, J., and Hendrichs, M. A. (1990). Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in nature: Location and diel pattern of feeding and other activities on fruiting and non-fruiting hosts and non-hosts.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83 632–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1989). The dynamics of sexual selection and founder effects in species formation. In Giddings, L. V., Kaneshiro, K. Y., and Anderson, W. W. (eds.),Genetics, Speciation, and the Founder Principle, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimsey, L. S. (1980). The behaviour of male orchid bees (Apidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and the question of leks.Anim. Behav. 28 996–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederhouse, R. C. (1982). Territorial defense and lek behavior of the black swallowtail butterfly,Papilio polyxenes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClain, D. K., and Marsh, N. B. (1989). Male copulatory success: heritability and relationship to mate fecundity in the southern green stinkbug.Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Heredity 64 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. J. 1989. Sexual selection inNauphoeta cinerea: Inherited mating preference?Behav. Genet. 19 717–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1983). Mate quality and mating decisions. In Bateson, P. (ed.),Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poramarcom, R., and Boake, C. R. B. (1991). Behavioral influences on male mating success in the Oriental fruit fly,Dacus dorsalis Hendel.Anim. Behav. 42 453–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J., and Hendrichs, J. (1979). Mating behavior ofCeratitis capitata on a field-caged host tree.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72 642–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robacker, D. C., and Hart, W. G. (1985). Courtship and territoriality of laboratory-reared Mexican fruit flies,Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae), in cages containing host and non-host trees.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78 488–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robacker, D. C., Mangan, R. L., Moreno, D. S., and Tarshis Moreno, A. M. (1991). Mating behavior and male mating success in wildAnastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) on a field caged host tree.J. Insect Behav. 4 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelly, T. E. (1987). Lek behavior of a Hawaiian Drosophila: Male spacing, aggression and female visitation.Anim. Behav. 35 1394–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivinski, J. (1989). Lekking and the small-scale distribution of the sexes in the Caribbean fruit fly,Anastrepha suspensa (Loew).J. Insect. Behav. 2 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1968). Courtship patterns and evolution of theDrosophila adiastola andplanitibia species subgroups.Evolution 32 435–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, N., Steiner, L. F., Ohinata, K., and Okamoto, R. (1969). Low-cost larval rearing medium for mass production of Oriental and Mediterranean fruit flies.J. Econ. Entomol. 62 967–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, W. B., Carter, P. A., and Donohue, K. (1986). Females' choice of “good genotypes” as mates is promoted by an insect mating system.Science 233 1187–1190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. C., Calkins, C. O., Chambers, D. L., Schwienbacher, W., and Russ, K. (1983). Acoustical aspects of behavior of Mediterranean fruit fly,Ceratitis capitata: Analysis and identification of courtship sounds.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 33 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, T. S., Kaneshiro, K. Y., and Prescott, L. D. (1992). Mating behavior of Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a natural environment.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85 214–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R. H. (1973). Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse,Centrocercus urophasianus.Anim. Behav. 6 85–169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whittier, T.S., Nam, F.Y., Shelly, T.E. et al. Male courtship success and female discrimination in the mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Behav 7, 159–170 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01990078

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01990078

Key words

Navigation