Summary
Consecutive sections from 33 paraffin-embedded human breast carcinomas without intratumor heterogeneity were sent for flow cytometric (FCM) DNA analysis in two experienced laboratories. FCM instruments, run conditions, and tumor disaggregation procedures were different in the two laboratories. In four cases (12%) the laboratories reported a different DNA ploidy and DNA index (DI). These variations were due to analytical reasons, differences in the detection rates of near-diploid and tetraploid DIs, not due to interpretation of data or the criteria used for aneuploidy. There was a significant correlation between S-phase fractions (SPF) obtained in the two laboratories (r = 0.90, p<0.0001) if only cases with concordant DI were included. Discordant DI usually led to very different SPF values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Kallioniemi O-P, Blanco G, Alavaikko M, Hietanen T, Mattila J, Lauslahti K, Lehtinen M, Koivula T: Improving the prognostic value of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer by combining DNA index and S-phase fraction. A proposed classification of DNA histograms in breast cancer. Cancer 62: 2183–2190, 1988
Clark GM, Dressler LG, Owens MA, Pounds G, Oldaker T, McGuire WL: Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry. New Engl J Med 320: 627–633, 1989
Toikkanen S, Joensuu H, Klemi P: The prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in invasive breast cancer — a study with long-term follow-up. Br J Cancer 60: 693–700, 1989
Kornstein MJ: DNA flow cytometry in the prognosis of nodenegative breast cancer (Letter). New Engl J Med 321: 473, 1989
Coon JS, Deitch AD, de Vere White RW, Koss LG, Melamed MR, Reeder JE, Weinstein RS, Wersto RP, Wheeless LL: Interinstitutional variability in DNA flow cytometric analysis of tumors: The National Cancer Institute's Flow Cytometry Network experience. Cancer 61: 126–130, 1988
Homburger HA, McCarthy R, Deodhar S: Assessment of interlaboratory variability in analytical cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 113: 667–672, 1989
Van Thiel ThPH, Van Der Linden JC, Baak JPA, Van de Sandt MM, Van Galen C, Bezemer PD: Reproducibility of flow cytometric assessment of follicular tumours of the thyroid. J Clin Pathol 42: 260–263, 1989
Joensuu H, Kallioniemi O-P: Different opinions on the classification of DNA histograms produced from paraffin-embedded tissue. Cytometry 10: 711–717, 1989
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kallioniemi, OP., Joensuu, H., Klemi, P. et al. Inter-laboratory comparison of DNA flow cytometric results from paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Tr 17, 59–61 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01812686
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01812686