Abstract
The design process associated with large engineering systems requires an initial decomposition of the complex system into subsystem modules which are coupled through transference of output data. The implementation of such a decomposition approach assumes that the ability exists to determine what subsystems and interactions exist and what order of execution will be imposed during the analysis process. Unfortunately, this is quite often an extremely complex task which may be beyond human ability to efficiently achieve. Further, in optimizing such a coupled system, it is essential to be able to determine which interactions figure prominently enough to significantly affect the accuracy of the optimal solution. The ability to determine “weak” versus “strong” coupling strengths would aid the designer in deciding which couplings could be permanently removed from consideration or which could be temporarily suspended so as to achieve computational savings with minimal loss in solution accuracy. An approach that uses normalized sensitivities to quantify coupling strengths is presented. The approach is applied to a coupled system composed of analytical equations for verification purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloebaum, C.L. 1989: Global sensitivity analysis in controlaugmented structural synthesis.AIAA Paper 89-0844
Bloebaum, C.L.; Hajela, P. 1991: Heuristic decomposition for nonhierachic systems.Proc. 32nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASE SDM Conf. (held in Baltimore, MD), submitted for review toInt. J. Eng. Des. Auto.
Bloebaum, C.L.; Hajela, P.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1992: Nonhierarchic system decomposition in structural optimization.Eng. Opt. 19, 171–186
Dhir, S.K.; Hurwitz, M.M. 1984: Role of optimization in interdisciplinary analyses of naval structures.Recent experiences in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, NASA CP 2327
Ferebee, M.J. 1984: IDEAS, a multidisciplinary computer-aided conceptual design system for spacecraft.Recent experiences in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, NASA CP 2327
Hajela P.; Bloebaum, C.L.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1990: Application of global sensitivity equations in multidisciplinary aircraft synthesis.J. Aircraft 27, 1002–1010
Hughes, O.F. 1984: Structural optimization of large ocean-going structures.Recent experiences in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, NASA CP 2327
Miura, H. 1984: Overview: applications of numerical optimization methods to helicopter design problems.Recent experiences in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, NASA CP 2327
Padula, S.L.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1987: A computer simulator for development of engineering system design methodologies.NASA TM-89109
Padula, S.L.; Young, K.C. 1986: Simulator for multilevel optimization research.NASA TM-87751
Prasad, B.; Magee, C.L. 1984: Application of optimization techniques to vehicle design — a review.Recent experiences in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, NASA CP 2327
Rogers, J.L. 1989: A knowledge-based tool for multilevel decomposition of a complex design problem.NASA TP 2903
Sensburg, O.; Fulhaus, K.; Schimdinger, G. 1988: Interdisciplinary design of aircraft structures for minimum weight.AIAA Paper 88-2302
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1982: A linear decomposition method for optimization problems - blueprint for development.NASA TM 83248
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1988: Optimization by decomposition: a step form hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems.Recent experiences in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, NASA CP 3031
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1990: On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems.AIAA J. 28, 155–160
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; Bloebaum, C.L.; Hajela, P. 1991: Sensitivity of control-augmented structures obtained by a system decomposition method.AIAA J. 29, 264–270
Steward, D.V. 1981:System analysis and management. New York: Petrocelli Books
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bloebaum, C.L. Coupling strength-based system reduction for complex engineering design. Structural Optimization 10, 113–121 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743538
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743538