Abstract
Dientamoeba fragilis, a common intestinal protozoan parasite in Canada, has been associated with diarrhoea and abdominal pain in some patients. Seroprevalence of this organism has not been reported previously. In the present study sera from three symptomatic patients, 12 age- and sexmatched controls, and 189 randomly selected healthy individuals (age 6 months to 19 years) were tested for antibodies againstDientamoeba fragilis by an indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay. All three symptomatic patients infected withDientamoeba fragilis had positive IIF titres of 80, and all 12 matched controls had positive titres ranging 20 to 160 (geometric mean titre 48). Of the 189 healthy children, 172 (91%) were positive at a serum dilution of 1∶10 or higher. The specificity of the IIF assay was reinforced by immunoblotting 20 representative serum samples againstDientamoeba fragilis, In all 17 IIF-positive serum samples, a 39 kDa protein band ofDientamoeba fragilis was identified, the same band recognized by a mouse monoclonal antibody raised in our laboratory. Findings over a five-year period indicate thatDientamoeba fragilis was the most common protozoan, followed closely byGiardia lamblia and more distantly byCryptosporidium parvum. The high seropositivity of 91% forDientamoeba fragilis compares reasonably well with serologic data obtained by IIF and reported previously forGiardia lamblia (85.6%) andCryptosporidium parvum (86%).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jepps MW, Dobell C:Dientamoeba fragilis, n.g., n.sp., a new intestinal amoeba from man. Parasitology 1918,10: 352–367.
Ockert G: Symptomatology, pathology, epidemiology, and diagnosis ofDientamoeba fragilis. In: Honigberg BM (ed): Trichomonads parasitic in humans. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990, p. 394–410.
Chan FTH, Guan MX, Mackenzie AMR: Application of indirect immunofluorescence to detection ofDientamoeba fragilis trophozoites in fecal specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 1710–1714.
Scholten T, Yang J: Evaluation of unpreserved and preserved stools for the detection and identification of intestinal parasites. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1974, 62: 563–567.
Grendon JH, Digiacomo RF, Frost FJ:Dientamoeba fragilis detection and prevalence: a survey of state public health laboratories. Public Health Reports 1991,106: 322–325.
Chan FTH, Guan MX, Mackenzie AMR, Diaz-Mitoma F: Susceptibility testing ofDientamoeba fragilis ATCC 30948 with iodoquinol, paromomycin, tetracycline, and metronidazole. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1994,38: 1157–1160.
Yang J, Scholten TH: A fixative for intestinal parasites permitting the use of concentration and permanent staining procedures. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1977, 67:300–304.
Tzipori S, Campbell I: Prevalence ofCryptosporidium antibodies in 10 animal species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1981, 14: 455–456.
Jokipii L, Miettinen A, Jokipii AMM: Antibodies to cysts ofGiardia lamblia in primary giardiasis and in the absence of giardiasis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 121–125.
Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227:680–685.
Harlow E, Lane D: Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1988, p. 139–243.
Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 1979, 76: 4350–4354.
Campbell PN, Current WL: Demonstration of serum antibodies toCryptosporidium sp. in normal and immunodeficient humans with confirmed infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 165–169.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, F., Stewart, N., Guan, M. et al. Prevalence ofDientamoeba fragilis antibodies in children and recognition of a 39 kDa immunodominant protein antigen of the organism. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 950–954 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690516
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01690516