Skip to main content
Log in

A topological model of limitations in design for manufacturing

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design for manufacturing (DFM) is a methodology that requires the use of specific manufacturing information at all stages of design. The method relies on a collection of informal and often controversial principles that seem to have eluded the benefits of formal analysis. The transition from design to manufacturing can be modeled as a mathematical mapping, and it has been previously shown how the discontinuity of this mapping formally captures the folklore that “small design changes can lead to significantly increased manufacturing cost”. We study the properties of the transition map in the presence of design and manufacturing variations, and show that its continuity is closely related to the structure of design and manufacturing topological spaces. The main result of this paper establishes conditions on these spaces under which design for manufacturing cannot be described by any continuous transition map. In practical terms, our study reveals the limitations of many DFM systems and approaches in their ability to relate design and manufacturing knowledge, and explains these limitations in terms of a basic incompatibility between the underlying design and manufacturing representations. We discuss how our model applies to DFM relative to traditional manufacturing methods (such as casting and stamping) and we speculate what changes might occur for alternative manufacturing technologies (such as electrical discharge machining (EDM), stereolithography, laser machining, and particle deposition).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, D. M.Design for Manufacturability, CIM Press, Lafayette, CA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dimensional and Tolerancing, ANSI Standard Y14.5M, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1982.

  3. Boothroyd, G. and Dewhurst, P.Product Design for Assembly, Boothroyd Dewhurst Inc., Wakefield, R.I., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer, M. and Stewart, N. F. “Modeling spaces for toleranced objects”,Int. J. Robotics Research 10, No. 5, 570–582, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyer, M. and Stewart, N. F. “Imperfect-form tolerancing on manifold objects: a metric approach”,Int. J. Robotics Research 11, No. 5, 482–90, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bralla, J. G.Handbook of Product Design for Manufacture, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glovin, S. and Peters, T. J. “Features as a basis for intelligent CAD/CAM”,Simulation and Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, October, 1987, 2-1–2-5.

  8. Joskowicz, L. “Mechanism comparison and classification for design”,Research in Engineering Design (1)3/4, 149–66, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kalpakjian, S.Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 2nd edn, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Munkres, J. R.Topology, a First Course, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Research Council,Improving Engineering Design: Designing for Competitive Advantage, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W.Engineering Design—A Systematic Approach, Springer, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poli, C., Dastidar, P. and Graves, R. “Design knowledge acquisition for DFM methodologies”,Research in Engineering Design 4(3), 131–45, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poli, C., Escudero, J. and Fernandez, F. “How part design affects injection molding costs”,Machine Design, 24 Nov., 1988.

  15. Poli, C. and Shanmugasundaram, S. “Design for die casting — a group technology based approach”,Proceedings, ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Miami, Sept. 22–25, 1991, pp. 135–41, 1991.

  16. Priest, J. W.Engineering Design for Productibility and Reliability, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pye, R. G. W.Injection Molding Design, 4th edn, Longman Scientific and Technical (co-published with John Wiley and Sons, New York), 1989.

  18. Rosen, D. W., Dixon, J. R. and Dong, X. “A methodology for conversions of feature-based representations”,Proceedings, ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, 1991.

  19. Rosen, D. W. and Peters, T. J. “Topological properties that model feature-based representation conversions within concurrent engineering”,Research in Engineering Design, 4(4), 147–158, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Requicha, A. A. G. and Voelcker, H. B. “An introduction to geometric modeling and its applications in mechanical design and production”, in J. T. Tou, editor,Advances in Information Systems Science, vol. 8, Plenum Publishing, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shah, J. J. “Feature transformations between application-specific feature spaces”,Computer-Aided Engineering, 5(6), 247–55, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taura, T. and Yoshikawa, H. “Metric space for intelligent CAD”,Proceedings, IFIP WG 5.2, Columbus, OH, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tomiyama, T. and Yoshikawa, H. “Extended general design theory”,Proceedings, IFIP WG 5.2, Tokyo, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, 95–130.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willard, S.General Topology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshikawa, H. “General design theory and a CAD system”,Man-Machine Communications in CAD/CAM, Proceedings, IFIP WG 5.2, Tokyo, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Peters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peters, T.J., Rosen, D.W. & Shapiro, V. A topological model of limitations in design for manufacturing. Research in Engineering Design 6, 223–233 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608401

Keywords

Navigation