Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The radial positions of metaphase chromosomes may be a consequence of the relative strength of their interaction with the spindle and their size

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microtubule orientated forces acting on chromosomes on spindles in mitosis and meiosis will produce a radial component of force in the plane of the metaphase plate. The strength of this vector will depend on the angle at which the microtubule meets the plate. Radial forces will tend to segregate chromosomes to peripheral or central positions, depending on their size, and also on the strength of the activity of individual centromeres. In prometaphase, forces pushing chromosomes from the poles will tend to force them to the periphery of the metaphase plate, as seen in radial metaphases. Tension towards the poles at late metaphase will pull smaller chromosomes and those with more powerfully active kinetochores towards the centre of the plate. If the two genomes in a hybrid cell have different centromeric activities, their chromosomes will be segregated. Microtubule assembly and disassembly, and motor proteins such as the kinesins and dynein which haul organelles along microtubules, can provide forces in both directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anamthawat-Jónsson K, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS (1993) Behaviour of parental genomes in the hybridHordeum vulgare × Hordeum bulbosum.J Heredity 84: 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endow SA (1993) Chromosome distribution, molecular motors and the claret protein.Trends Genet 9: 52–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbsky GJ (1992) Chromosome motion in mitosis.Bioessays 14: 73–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbsky GJ, Sammak PJ, Borisy GG (1987) Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately dissassemble from the kinetochore ends.J Cell Biol 104: 9–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison JS, Bennett MD (1983) The position of centromeres on the somatic metaphase plate of grasses.J Cell Sci 64: 163–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt GM (1976) Meiotic drive for B-chromosomes in the primary oocytes ofMyrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae).Chromosoma 56: 381–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman AA, Mitcheson TJ (1991) Two different microtubulebased motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores.Nature 351: 206–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch AR, Schwarzacher T, Mosgoller W, Bennett MD, Heslop-Harrison JS (1991) Parental genomes are separated throughout the cell cycle in a plant hybrid.Chromosoma 101: 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald HB, Stewart RJ, Goldstein LSB (1990) The kinesinlikencd protein ofDrosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor.Cell 63: 1159–1165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosgöller W, Leitch AR, Brown JKM, Heslop-Harrison JS (1991) Chromosome arrangements in human fibroblasts at mitosis.Hum Genet 88: 27–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas RB (1988) The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis.Annu Rev Biophys Chem 17: 431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfarr CM, Coue M, Grissom PM, Hays TS, Porter ME, McIntosh JR (1990) Cytoplasmic dynein is localised to kinetochores during mitosis.Nature 345, 263–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawin KE, Schooley JM (1991). Motor proteins in cell division.Trends Cell Biol 1: 122–129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer ER, Wordeman L, Schroer TE, Sheetz MP (1990) Localisation of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores.Nature 345: 266–268.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vig BK, Athwal RS (1989). Sequence of centromere separation: separation in quasistable mouse—human somatic cell hybrids.Chromosoma 98: 167–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RA, Salmon ED, Endow SA (1990) TheDrosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule.Nature 347: 780–782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yen TJ, Li G, Schaar BT, Szilak I, Cleveland DW (1992) CENPE is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis.Nature 359: 536–539.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelesco PA, Graves JAM (1988) Chromosome segregation from cell hybrids. IV movement and position of segregant set chromosomes in early-phase interspecific cell hybrids.J Cell Sci 89: 49–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biology and Biochemistry, The Queens University of Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, BT9 7BL, Belfast, UK

    Hugh L. Fletcher

Authors
  1. Hugh L. Fletcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, H.L. The radial positions of metaphase chromosomes may be a consequence of the relative strength of their interaction with the spindle and their size. Chromosome Res 2, 21–24 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539449

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539449

Key words

Search

Navigation