Abstract
The genetic analysis of aging processes has matured in the last ten years with reports that long-lived strains of both fruit flies and nematodes have been developed. Several attempts to identify mutants in the fruit fly with increased longevity have failed and the reasons for these failures are analyzed. A major problem in obligate sexual species, such as the fruit fly, is the presence of inbreeding depression that makes the analysis of life-history traits in homozygotes very difficult. Nevertheless, several successful genetic analyses of aging inDrosophila suggest that with careful design, fruitful analysis of induced mutants affecting life span is possible. In the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans, mutations in theage-1 gene result in a life extension of some 70%; thusage-1 clearly specifies a process involved in organismic senescence. This gene maps to chromosome II, well separated from a locus (fer-15) which is responsible for a large fertility deficit in the original stocks. There is no trade-off between either rate of development or fertility versus life span associated with theage-1 mutation. Transgenic analyses confirm that the fertility deficit can be corrected by a wild-typefer-15 transformant (transgene); however, the life span of these transformed stocks is affected by the transgenic array in an unpredictable fashion. The molecular nature of theage-1 gene remains unknown and we continue in our efforts to clone the gene.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arking, R., 1987. Evolution of longevity in animals, pp. 1–22 in Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Longevity inDrosophila, edited by A. D. Woodhead & K. H. Thompson. Plenum Publishing Corp., NY.
Arking, R., 1988. Genetic analysis of aging processes inDrosophila. Exp. Aging. Res. 14: 125–135.
Arking, R., S. Buck, A. Berrios, S. Dwyer & G. T. Baker III, 1991. Elevated paraquat resistance can be used as a bioassay for longevity in a genetically based long-lived strain ofDrosophila. Dev. Genet. 12: 362–370.
Arking, R. & R. A. Wells, 1990. Genetic alteration of normal aging processes is responsible for extended longevity inDrosophila. Devel. Genet. 11: 141–148.
Brooks, A. & T. E. Johnson, 1991. Genetic specification of life span and self-fertility in recombinant-inbred strains ofCaenorhabditis elegans. Heredity 67: 19–28.
Brenner, S., 1974. The Genetics ofCaenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71–94.
Capecchi, M. R., 1989. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science 244: 1288–1292.
Charlesworth, B., 1988. Selection for longer-lived rodents. Growth Devel. Aging 52: 211.
Coulson, A., J. Sulston, S. Brenner & J. Karn, 1986. Toward a physical map of the genome of the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 83: 7821–7825.
Coulson, A., J. Waterston, J. Sulston & Y. Kohara, 1988. Genome linking with yeast artificial chromosomes. Nature 335: 184–186.
Finch, C. E., 1990. Longevity, Senescence, and the Genome. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Fleming, J. E., G. S. Spicer, R.C. Garrison & M. R. Rose, 1993. Two-dimensional protein electrophoretic analysis of postponed aging inDrosophila. Genetica (In press).
Friedman, D. B. & T. E. Johnson, 1988a. A mutation in the age-1 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans lengthens life and reduces hermaphrodite fertility. Genetics 118: 75–86.
Friedman, D. B. & T. E. Johnson, 1988b. Three mutants that extend both mean and maximum life span of the nematode,Caenorhabditis elegans, define the age-1 gene. J. Gerontol. Biol. Sci. 43: B102–109.
Gould, A. B. & A. M. Clark, 1977. X-ray induced mutations causing adult life-shortening inDrosophila melanogaster. Exp. Gerontol. 12: 107–112.
Graves, J. L., E. C. Toolson, C. Jeong, L. N. Vu & M. R. Rose, 1992. Desiccation, flight, glycogen and postponed senescence inDrosophila melanogaster. Physiol. Zool. (In press).
Harrison, D. E., 1988. Mini-Editorial Introduction: Selection for longer-lived rodents. Growth Devel. Aging 52: 207.
Herman, R. K., 1988. Genetics, pp. 17–45 in The NematodeCaenorhabditis elegans, edited by W. B. Wood, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Hutchinson, E. W., 1993. Genetica (In press).
Hutchinson, E. W. & M. R. Rose, 1990. Quantitative genetic analysis of postponed aging inDrosophila melanogaster, pp. 65–85 in Genetic Effects on Aging II, edited by D. E. Harrison, Telford Press, Caldwell, NJ.
Johnson, T. E., 1984. Analysis of the biological basis of aging in the nematode, with special emphasis onCaenorhabditis elegans, pp. 59–93 in Invertebrate Models in Aging Research, edited by D. H. Mitchell & T. E. Johnson, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Johnson, T. E., 1987. Aging can be genetically dissected into component processes using long-lived lines ofCaenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84: 3777–3781.
Johnson, T. E., 1988. Thoughts on the selection of longer-lived rodents. Growth Devel. Aging 52: 207–209.
Johnson, T. E., 1990. The increased life span of age-1 mutants inCaenorhabditis elegans results from lowering the Gompertz rate of aging. Science 249: 908–912.
Johnson, T. E., D. B. Friedman, N. Foltz, P. A. Fitzpatrick & J. E. Shoemaker, 1990. Genetic variants and mutations ofCaenorhabditis elegans provide tools for dissecting the aging processes, pp. 101–127 in Genetic Effects on Aging. Volume II, edited by D. E. Harrison, Telford Press, NY.
Johnson, T. E. & E. W. Hutchinson, Absence of strong heterosis for life span and other life history traits inCaenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, in press.
Johnson, T. E., E. W. Hutchinson & P. M. Tedesco, Genetic and physical mapping of fer-15 and age-1 using chromosome deficiencies inCaenorhabditis elegans (Submitted).
Johnson, T. E., D. H. Mitchell, S. Kline, R. Kemal & J. Foy, 1984. Arresting development arrests aging in the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans. Mech. Ageing Dev. 28: 23–40.
Johnson, T. E. & W. B. Wood, 1982. Genetic analysis of life-span inCaenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 6603–6607.
Klass, M. R., 1983. A method for the isolation of longevity mutants in the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans and initial results. Mech. Ageing Dev. 22: 279–286.
Lee, E. & M. Desu, 1972. A computer program for comparing k samples with right-censored data. Comp. Progs. Biomed. 2: 315–321.
Leffelaar, D. & T. A. Grigliatti, 1984. A mutation inDrosophila that appears to accelerate aging, Develop. Genet. 4: 199–210.
Luckinbill, L. S., R. Arking, M. J. Clare, W. C. Cirocco & S. A. Muck, 1984. Selection for delayed senescence inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38: 996–1003.
Luckinbill, L. S., J. L. Graves, A. Tomkiw & O. Sowirka, 1988. A qualitative analysis of some life-history correlates of longevity inDrosophila melanogaster. Evol. Eco. 2: 85–94.
Luckinbill, L. S., V. Riha, S. Rhine & T. A. Grudzien, 1990. The role of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the evolution of longevity inDrosophila melanogaster. Heredity 65: 29–38.
Maynard Smith, J., 1958. The effects of temperature and egg laying on the longevity ofDrosophila subobscura. Journal of Experimental Biology 35: 832–842.
Mello, C. C., J. M. Kramer, D. Stinchcomb & V. Ambros, 1991. Efficient gene transfer inC. elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. The EMBO J. 10: 3959–3970.
Olson, M. V., 1992. The lessons from the nematode. Curr. Biol. 5: 221–223.
Pretzlaff, R. & R. Arking, 1989. Patterns of amino acid incorporation in long-lived genetic strains ofDrosophila melanogaster. Exp. Geront. 24: 67–81.
Roberts, P. A. & R. B. Iredale, 1985. Can mutagenesis reveal major genes affecting senescence. Exp. Geront. 20: 119–121.
Rose, M. R., 1984. Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38: 1004–1010.
Rose, M. R., 1988. Response to ‘Thoughts on the selection of longer-lived rodents’-Rejoinders. Growth Devel. Aging 52: 209–211.
Rose, M. R., 1991. Evolutionary Biology of Aging. Oxford Univ. Press, NY.
Rose, M. R., J. E. Fleming, G. Spicer, R. E. Tyler & F. J. Ayala, 1990. Molecular genetics of postponed aging inDrosophila (Abstract).The Gerontologist 30: 252A-253A.
Rose, M. R., 1990. A workshop summary: should mice be selected for postponed aging? Growth Devel. Aging 54: 7–15.
Rose, M. R. 1993. Genetica (In press).
Sigurdson, D. C., G. J. Spanier & R. K. Herman, 1984.Caenorhabditis elegans deficiency mapping. Genetics 108: 331–345.
St Johnston, D. & C. Nusslein-Volhard, 1992. The origin of pattern and polarity in theDrosophila embryo. Cell 68: 201–219.
Stinchcomb, D. T., J. E. Shaw, S. H. Carr & D. Hirsh, 1985. Extrachromosomal DNA transformation ofCaenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cell Biol 5: 3484–3496.
Stearns, S. C., M. Kaiser & E. Hillesheim, 1993. Effects of fitness components of enhanced expression of elongation factor EF-1α inDrosophila melanogaster: I. The contrasting approaches of molecular and population biologists.Genetica (In press).
Sulston, J., Z. Du, K. Thomas, R. Wilson, L. Hillier,R. Staden, N. Halloran, P. Green, J. Thierry-Mieg, L. Qiu, S. Dear, A. Coulson, M. Craxton, R. Durbin, M. Berks, M. Metzstein, T. Hawkins, R. Ainscough & R. Waterston, 1992. TheC. elegans genome sequencing project: a beginning. Nature 356: 37–41.
Van Voorhies, W. A., 1992. Production of sperm reduces nematode lifespan. Nature 360: 456–458.
Watson, J. D., M. Gilman, J. Witkowski & M. Zoller, 1992. Recombinant DNA. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Wood, W. B., 1988. The NematodeCaenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, T.E., Tedesco, P.M. & Lithgow, G.J. Comparing mutants, selective breeding, and transgenics in the dissection of aging processes ofCaenorhabditis elegans . Genetica 91, 65–77 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435988
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435988