Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer participation and influence in a health systems agency

  • Research Reports
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer participation and influence were studied in one Health Systems Agency in the southeastern United States over a 20-month period (July 1976–February 1978). Consumer board members were found to be significantly less influential in agency decision making than were provider board members. This difference in influence existed even though virtually no difference existed between consumers' and providers' levels of participation. Consumer board members, while representing minority and nonminority, and both rural and nonrural groups, tended nevertheless also to be middle-class, middle-income individuals. Low-income and working-class groups were underrepresented on the board of the Health Systems Agency. Furthermore, consumer representatives tended to be satisfied with and have access to health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koseki LK, Hayakawa JM: Consumer participation and community organization: Implications of national health legislation.Med Care 17:244–254, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alford RR, Friedland R: Political participation and public policy.Ann Rev Socio 1:429–479, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paap WR: Consumer-based boards of health centers: Structural problems in achieving effective control.Public Health 68:578–582, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jonas S: A theoretical approach to the question of ‘community control’ of health service facilities.Public Health 61:916–921, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glogow E: Community participation and sharing in control of public health services.Health Serv Reports 88:442–448, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reissman F, Gartner A: Community control and radical social change.Social Policy 1:52–55, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aronowitz S: The dialectics of community control.Social Policy 1:47–51, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beck B: Community control: A distraction not an answer.Social Work 14:14–20, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milio N: Dimensions of consumer participation and national health legislation.Am J Public Health 64:357–367, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beck A, Bishop P:The Consumer Support Group: A Report to the Board of Trustees, Capitol Area Comprehensive Health Planning Association, Lansing, Michigan, 1973.

  11. Douglass C: Representation patterns in community health decision making.Health Soc Behav 2:135–145, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson S, Dohrenwend B, Klein D:Interviewing: Its Forms and Functions. New York, Basic Books, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson DM, Kerr M: Citizen influence in health service programs.Am J Public Health 61:1518–1524, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steckler A, Dawson L: Determinants of consumer influence in a health systems agency.Health Educ Monogr 6:378–393, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Allan Steckler and Leonard Dawson are faculty members of the Department of Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Nancy Dellinger and Anita Williams are staff members of Capital HSA, Durham, N.C.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steckler, A., Dawson, L., Dellinger, N. et al. Consumer participation and influence in a health systems agency. J Community Health 6, 181–193 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323009

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323009

Keywords

Navigation