Abstract
The purpose of this study was to define an optimal strategy for the tomographic reconstruction procedure in routine brain single-photon emission tomography (SPET) studies, including the number of projections, filter function and matrix size. A set of projection data with different count densities was obtained from a technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) brain SPET acquisition from one volunteer. The projections were reconstructed with different filters and the quality of the reconstructed images was determined using both a subjective observer rating score and the Gilbert index. For each count density, the observers' choice corresponded to images with the lowest Gilbert index. The noise level in brain SPET sections was estimated and correlated with the fractal dimension. The results of this study indicate that although noise represents a fundamental component of brain SPET imaging, image quality also depends on the reconstructed spatial resolution. Image quality is satisfactorily described by fractal dimension. In addition the optimal filter function depends on the available count density. For high count levels, optimal reconstruction may be obtained by using a high-resolution matrix and a slightly smoother reconstruction filter. When count densities are low, best results are obtained by using a low-resolution matrix and a sharper filter. Finally, this study suggests that image quality is not influenced by the number of projections for equivalent count densities. These results were confirmed by 30 HMPAO brain SPET studies acquired in a routine clinical setting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Budinger TF. Revival of clinical nuclear medicine brain imaging.J Nucl Med 1981; 22: 1094–1097.
Coleman RE, Drayer GP, Jaszczack RJ. Studying regional brain function: a challenge for SPECT.J Nucl Med 1982; 23: 266–270.
Madsen MT, Park CH. Enhancement of SPECT images by Fourier filtering the projection image set.J Nucl Med 1985; 26:395–402.
Mueller SP, Pollak JF, Kijewski MF, Holman BL. Collimator selection for SPECT brain imaging: the advantage of high resolution.J Nucl Med 1986; 27:1729–1738.
Madsen MT, Chang W, Hichwa RD. Spatial resolution and count density requirements in brain SPECT imaging.Phys Med Biol 1992; 37: 1625–1636.
Contino J, Touya JJ, Cotbus HF, Rahimian J. Performance index: a method for quantitative evaluation of filters used in clinical SPECT.J Nucl Med 1984; 25: P88.
Appledorn CR, Oppenheim BE, Wellman HN. Performance measures in the selection of reconstruction for SPECT imaging.J Nucl Med 1985; 26: P35.
Gilland DR, Tsui BM, McCartney WH, Perry JR, Berg J. Determination of the optimum filter function for SPECT imaging.J Nucl Med 1988; 29: 643–650.
Muehllehner G. Effect of resolution improvement on required count density in ECT imaging: a computer simulation.Phys Med Biol 1985; 30: 163–173.
Gilbert P. Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections.J Theor Biol 1972; 36:105–117.
King MA, Schwinger RB, Penney BC. Variation of the count dependent Metz filter with imaging system modulation transfer function.Med Biol 1986; 13: 139–149.
Gilland DR, Jaszczack RJ, Greer KI, Coleman RE. Quantitative SPECT reconstruction of iodine 123 data.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 527–533.
Pentland AP. Fractal based description of natural scenes.IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 1984; 6: 661–674.
Gillen GJ. A simple method for the measurement of local statistical noise levels in SPECT.Phys Med Biol 1992; 37: 1573–1579.
Houston AS, Kemp PM, Griffiths PT, MacLeod MA. An estimation of noise levels in HMPAO RCBF SPECT images using simulation and phantom data; comparison with results obtained from repeated normal controls.Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 873–884.
Huesman RH. The effects of a finite number of projection angle and finite lateral sampling of projections on the propagation of statistical errors in transverse section reconstruction.Phys Med Biol 1977; 22: 511–521.
Mandelbrot BB. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1982.
Chester MS. Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging.Phys Med Biol 1992; 37: 1433–1476.
Tsui BM, Zhao X, Frey EC, McCartney WH. Quantitative SPECT tomography: basic and clinical considerations.Semin Nucl Med 1994; 24: 36–65.
Fahey FH, Harkness BA, Keyes JW, Madsen MT, Battisti C, Zito V. Sensitivity, resolution and image quality with a multi-head SPECT camera.J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 1859–1863.
Kouris K, Costa DC, Jarritt PH, Townsend CE, Ell PJ. Brain SPECT using a dedicated three-headed camera system.J Nucl Med Tech 1992, 20: 68–72.
Tapiovaara MJ, Wagner RF. SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging. I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.Phys Med Biol 1993; 38: 71–92.
Barrett HH. Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.J Opt Soc Am 1990; 7: 1266–1278.
Gouyet JF. Physique et structures fractales. Paris: Masson, 1992.
Kojima A, Matsumoto M, Takahashi M, Hirota Y, Yoshida H. Effect of spatial resolution on SPECT quantification values.J Nucl Med 1989; 30: 508–514.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kotzki, PO., Mariano-Goulart, D., Quiquere, M. et al. Optimum tomographic reconstruction parameters for HMPAO brain SPET imaging: a practical approach based on subjective and objective indexes. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 671–677 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254569
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254569