Skip to main content
Log in

Debonding of photoresist caused by Case II diffusion

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A glassy polymeric photoresist bonded to a thin copper substrate was immersed in an organic penetrant environment. Debonding of the polymer layer from the substrate was observed by monitoring the deflection of the composite strip. The diffusion of the environment into the polymer layer was followed using Rutherford backscattering spectrometry. For all environments investigated the diffusion showed the characteristics of Case II diffusion, i.e. a uniformly swollen layer formed behind a sharp front and propagated into the polymer at a constant velocity. Even though the front velocity could be varied over three orders of magnitude by varying the environment or the temperature, debonding always occurred when the front had penetrated only about one-fifth of the total layer thickness. It is concluded that debonding is driven by release of the elastic strain energy stored in the composite strip rather than a specific attack of the interface by the environment. Additions of a smaller organic molecule to a predominately large organic molecule environment were found to produce a marked increase in the kinetics of debonding and a corresponding increase in the Case II front velocity. To discover the mechanism of this effect, experiments were carried out with mixtures of iodomethane and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCE). Rutherford backscattering spectra showed that the smaller iodomethane diffused ahead of the main Case II diffusion front of the TCE. It is proposed that the increase in Case II front velocity in the mixture results from the fact that the faster diffusing iodomethane preplasticizes the polymer ahead of the front.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Alfrey,Chem. Eng. News 43 (1965) 64.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. C. Newns,Trans. Faraday Soc. 52 (1956) 1533.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. S. Park, in “Diffusion in Polymers”, edited by J. Crank and G. S. Park (Academic, London, 1968) p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. B. Hopfenberg, R. H. Holley andV. Stannett,Polym. Engng Sci. 9 (1969) 242.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. H. Holley, H. B. Hopfenberg andV. Stannett,ibid. 10 (1970) 376.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. R. Baird, H. B. Hopfenberg andV. Stannett,ibid. 11 (1971) 274.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. H. M. Jacques, H. B. Hopfenberg andV. Stannett,ibid. 13 (1973) 81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Sarti,Polymer 20 (1979) 827.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. L. Thomas andA. H. Windle,Polymer 18 (1977) 1195.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Idem, J. Membrane Sci. 3 (1978) 337.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Idem, Polymer 21 (1980) 619.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Idem, ibid. 22 (1981) 627.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Idem, ibid. 23 (1982) 529.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. K. Chu, J. W. Mayer andM. A. Nicolet, “Backscattering Spectrometry” (Academic, New York, 1978) Ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. J. Mills, C. J. Palmstrøm andE. J. Kramer,J. Mater. Sci. 21 (1986) 1479.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. R. Doolittle,Nuclear Instrum. Meth. B9 (1985) 344.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Idem, ibid. B15 (1986) 227.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. J. Mills andE. J. Kramer,J. Mater. Sci. 21 (1986) 4151.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.-Y. Hui, K. C. Wu, R. C. Lasky andE. J. Kramer,J. Appl. Phys. 61 (1987) 5137.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Idem, Kramer, MSC Report no. 5851,ASME Trans, in press.

  21. R. C. Lasky, PhD thesis, Cornell University (1986) p. 119.

  22. K. Kendall, “Electronic Packaging Materials Science”, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 40, edited by E. A. Giess, K.-N. Tu, D. R. Uhlmann (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1985) p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Idem, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 6 (1973) 1782.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, P.J., Kramer, E.J. Debonding of photoresist caused by Case II diffusion. J Mater Sci 24, 439–446 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107424

Keywords

Navigation