Abstract
A sentence in discourse may appear in the passive voice to emphasize the logical object rather than the logical subject when it is thematically more important. Two experiments are reported that explore the impact of this textual function of voice on sentence memory. The first experiment required subjects to listen to prose passages and then recall them. Sentences were recalled predominantly in the active voice regardless of voice or thematic focus in the prose passage, showing that the English-language bias for the active voice was a more important determinant of sentence reconstruction than was the experimental manipulation of thematic context. The second experiment required subjects to listen to or read either prose passages or lists of unrelated sentences and then to try to recognize “key” sentences that were either unchanged or changed lexically, semantically, or in voice. Recognition, both overall and specifically for voice, was better for sentences that were read than for those that were heard, and recognition for semantic change was consistently higher than for any other. Only when passages were read was there evidence in support of a thematic textual influence on memory for sentence voice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 149–162.
Anderson, J. R., & Paulson, R. Representation and retention of verbatim information.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 439–451.
Anisfeld, M., & Klenbort, I. On the functions of structural paraphrase: The view from the passive voice.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,79, 117–126.
Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 331–350.
Bregman, A. S., & Strasberg, R. Memory for the syntactic form of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 396–403.
Halliday, M. A. K. Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.),New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin, 1970, Pp. 140–165.
James, C. T., Thompson, J. G., & Baldwin, J. M. The reconstructive process in sentence memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 51–63.
Sachs, J. S. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception and Psychophysics, 1967,2, 437–442.
Sachs, J. S. Memory in reading and listening to discourse.Memory and Cognition, 1974,2, 95–100.
Tannenbaum, P. H., & Williams, F. Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 246–250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NIMH Grant 32063.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerr, N.H., Butler, S.F., Maykuth, P.L. et al. The effects of thematic context and presentation mode on memory for sentence voice. J Psycholinguist Res 11, 247–264 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067567
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067567