Skip to main content
Log in

Familial resemblance for the Identical Blocks Test of spatial ability: No evidence for X linkage

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Identical Blocks Test of spatial ability was administered to subsamples of the two largest ethnic groups tested in the Hawaii Family Study of Cognition—Americans of European ancestry (171 families) and Americans of Japanese ancestry (98 families). Results of a hierarchical multiple regression analysis of family data and correlational analyses provided no evidence to support the hypothesis that spatial ability is influenced by a major, X-linked, recessive gene. Thus it appears that recent failures to replicate the sex-linkage pattern obtained by Stafford (1961) are not due to differences in the tests employed. We suggest that alternative explanations should be sought for the well-known sex difference in spatial ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ashton, G. C., Polovina, J. J., and Vandenberg, S. G. (1979). Segregation analysis of family data for 15 tests of cognitive ability.Behav. Genet. 9:329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., and Kolakowski, D. (1973). Further evidence of sex-linked major-gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, Jr., T. J., and McGee, M. G. (1977). Sex differences in human spatial ability: Not an X-linked recessive gene effect.Soc. Biol. 24:332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., and Kuse, A. R. (1978). Sex linkage: An alternative test.Behav. Genet. 8:543–544 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Johnson, R. C., Kuse, A. R., McClearn, G. E., Polovina, J., Vandenberg, S. G., and Wilson, J. R. (1979). Familial resemblance for specific cognitive abilities.Behav. Genet. 9:23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J., Sharan, S., and Jacoby, R. (1978). In pursuit of the “spatial gene”: A family study.Behav. Genet. 8:27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, R. E. (1961). Sex differences in spatial visualization as evidence of sex-linked inheritance.Percept. Motor Skills 13:428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. E., and Hyde, J. S. (1978). A comment on Jensen's note on sex-linkage and race differences in spatial ability.Behav. Genet. 8:207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental Rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.Percept. Motor Skills 47:599–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R. (1979). Spatial ability: A critical review of the sex-linked major gene hypothesis. In Wittig, M. C., and Petersen, A. C. (eds.),Determinants of Sex-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, W. M. (1975). Sex-linked major gene influences on selected types of spatial performance.Behav. Genet. 5:281–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The results reported here are made possible by collaboration of a group of investigators (G. C. Ashton, R. C. Johnson, M. P. Mi, and M. N. Rashad at the University of Hawaii and J. C. DeFries, G. E. McClearn, S. G. Vandenberg, and J. R. Wilson at the University of Colorado) supported by NSF Grant GB-34720 and Grant HD-06669 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The senior author also acknowledges support by NIMH Grant MH-11167.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corley, R.P., DeFries, J.C., Kuse, A.R. et al. Familial resemblance for the Identical Blocks Test of spatial ability: No evidence for X linkage. Behav Genet 10, 211–215 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066271

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066271

Key Words

Navigation