Skip to main content
Log in

Specific anosmia in the laboratory mouse

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an approach to a general theory of olfaction, different specific anosmia phenotypes characterized by different profiles of odorant sensitivities have been proposed for humans. In the present experiments, male inbred mice were tested for relative odorant sensitivity using a conditioned aversion technique and odors classified as primary or complex for humans. C57BL/6J and C57BL/10J mice appeared to be less sensitive to the primary odorant isovaleric acid than were males of seven other inbred strains (A/J, AKR/J, BALB/cJ, C3HeB/FeJ, DBA/2J, SJL/J, and SWR/J). In comparisons of C57BL/6J and AKR/J strains, the relative insensitivity of C57 to isovaleric acid did not generalize to the musklike primary odor of pentadecalactone or to the complex odor of amyl acetate. The C57BL/6J genotype may provide an animal model of a specific anosmia as characterized among humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoore, J. E. (1967). Specific anosmia: A clue to the olfactory code.Nature 214:1095–1098.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, J. E. (1970).Molecular Basis of Odor, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, J. E. (1971). Olfactory genetics and anosmia. In Beidler, L. M. (ed.)Handbook of Sensory Physiology, IV: Chemical Senses, 1: Olfaction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, J. E. (1975). Four primary odor modalities in man: Experimental evidence and possible significance. In Denton, D., and Coghlan, J. P. (eds.),Olfaction and Taste, V, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, J. E., Venstrom, D., and Davis, A. R. (1968). Measurement of specific anosmia.Percept. Motor Skills,26:143–164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beets, M. G. J. (1971). Olfactory response and molecular structure. In Beidler, L. M. (ed.),Handbook of Sensory Physiology, IV: Chemical Senses, 1: Olfaction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J., Hankins, W. G., and Rusiniak, K. W. (1974). Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat.Science 185:824–831.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guillot, M. (1948a). Anosmies partielles et odeurs fondamentales.Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 226:1307–1309. As cited in Beets (1971) and in Amooreet al. (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillot, M. (1948b) Sur quelques caractères des phénomènes d'anosmie partielle.Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. Paris 142:161–162. As cited in Beets (1971) and in Amooreet al. (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgman, C. D. (ed.), (1953).Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, G. P., and Whitney, G. (1975). Alcohol-induced conditioned aversion: Genotypic specificity in mice. (Mus musculus).J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 89:340–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi, T. (1973). Genetic alteration of olfactory function inDrosophila melanogaster.Japan. J. Genet. 48:105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R. P., Keverne, E. B., and Bonsall, R. W. (1971). Pheromones: Isolation of male sex attractants from a female primate.Science 172:964–966.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schwarze, D., Müller-Schwarze, C., Singer, A. G., and Silverstein, R. M. (1974). Mammalian pheromone: Identification of active component in the subauricular scent of the male pronghorn.Science 183:860–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozental, J. M., and Norris, D. M. (1975). Genetically variable olfactory receptor sensitivity inPeriplaneta americana.Life Sci. 17:105–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., and Kalat, J. W. (1971). Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning.Psychol. Rev. 78:459–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. C. (1971). Radiation: Its detection and its effects on taste preferences. In Stellar, E., and Sprague, J. M. (eds.),Progress in Physiological Psychology, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D. (1963). Physical variables in the olfactory stimulation process.J. Gen. Physiol. 46:453–489.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D. (1971). Nonolfactory responses from the nasal cavity: Jacobson's organ and the trigeminal system. In Beidler, L. M. (ed.),Handbook of Sensory Physiology, IV: Chemical Senses, 1: Olfaction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whissell-Buechy, D., and Amoore, J. E. (1973). Odor-blindness to musk: Simple recessive inheritance.Nature 242:271–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon, H. C., Dragoin, W. B., and Kral, P. A. (1971). Illness-induced aversions in rat and quail: Relative salience of visual and gustatory cues.Science 171:826–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, C. J., and Tucker, D. (1975). Preliminary investigations of olfactory deficits in mice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, Austin, Texas, March 20–22.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service Grants MH-11218, NS-08814, and MH-05116 and by an award from the Florida State University Committee on Faculty Research Support. Portions of the data were presented at the meeting of the Behavioral Genetics Association, Austin, Texas, March 1975.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wysocki, C.J., Whitney, G. & Tucker, D. Specific anosmia in the laboratory mouse. Behav Genet 7, 171–188 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066005

Key Words

Navigation