Abstract
The time that male field crickets spend calling was measured electronically in the laboratory to examine nightly calling duration from different species and populations. Male Gryllus integerfrom Davis, CA, and Las Cruces, NM, called approximately 7 h per 24 h, whereas male G. integerfrom San Antonio and Austin, TX, and Norman, OK, and male G. rubensfrom McAlester, OK, and Arkadelphia, AR, called approximately 3 h per 24 h. Variation in duration of calling is discussed in terms of the energetic costs of producing song and selection against calling by acoustically orienting parasites and predators. Duration of calling was also studied infield-collected male G. integer.Males were first observed in field populations and then collected. Those males observed calling in the field later called significantly more in the laboratory than males observed showing non-calling, satellite behavior. Flying G. integercollected under lights were intermediate in their calling duration to calling and satellite males. These data are discussed in terms of the heritability of nightly calling song duration infield crickets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. D. (1957). The taxonomy of the field crickets of the eastern United States (Orthoptera: Gryllidae;Acheta).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 50: 584–602.
Alexander, R. D. (1975). Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In Pimentel, D. (ed.)Insects, Science and Society, Academic Press, New York. pp. 35–77.
Cade, W. H. (1975). Acoustically orienting parasitoids: Fly phonotaxis to cricket song.Science 190: 1312–1313.
Cade, W. H. (1979a). The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.),Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York, pp. 343–379.
Cade, W. H. (1979b). Field cricket dispersal flights measured by crickets landing at lights.Tex. J. Sci. 31: 125–130.
Cade, W. H. (1981). Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets.Science 212: 563–564.
Cade, W. H. (1990). Nightly and hourly rates of attraction of flying field crickets,Gryllus integer, to conspecific song.Can. J. Zool. (in press).
Cade, W. H., and Wyatt, D. (1984). Factors affecting calling behaviour in field crickets,Teleogryllus andGryllus (age, weight, density, and parasites).Behaviour 88: 61–75.
Otte, D. (1977). Communication in Orthoptera. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.)How Animals Communicate, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 334–361.
Prestwich, K. N., and Walker, T. J. (1981). Energetics of singing in crickets: Effect of temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).J. Comp. Physiol. B 145: 199–212.
Sakaluk, S. K., and Belwood, J. J. (1984). Gecko phonotaxis to cricket calling song: A case of satellite predation.Anim. Behav. 32: 659–662.
Smith, C. J., and Cade, W. H. (1987). Song characteristics and fertility in hybridization experiments on the field crickets,Gryllus integer andG. rubens.Can. J. Zool. 65: 2390–2394.
Walker, T. J. (1986). Monitoring the flights of field crickets(Gryllus spp.) and a tachinid fly(Euphasiopteryx ochracea) in North Florida.Fla. Entomol. 69: 678–685.
Walker, T. J. (1989). A live trap for monitoringEuphasiopteryx and tests withE. ochracea (Diptera: Tachinidae).Fla. Entomol. 72: 314–319.
Weissman, D. B., Rentz, D. C. F., Alexander, R. D., and Loher, W. (1980). Field crickets(Gryllus andAcheta) of California and Baja California, Mexico (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllinae).Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 106: 327–356.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cade, W.H. Inter- and intraspecific variation in nightly calling duration in field crickets,Gryllus integer andG. rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Insect Behav 4, 185–194 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054611
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054611