Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Procedural justice research

  • Social Science Perspectives On Justice
  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the past decade the study of the psychology of procedural justice has become well established within the field of justice. It has been widely found that people are as concerned with the fairness of the way decisions are made as they are with the fairness of those decisions (i.e., distributive justice). This paper identifies the questions which have dominated research on procedural justice during the past decade, discusses the conclusions which have been reached about those questions, and suggests important areas for future exploration by procedural justice researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J. W., Hensler, D. R., and Nelson, C. E. (1983).Simple Justice: How Litigants Fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. K., and Hayden, R. M. (1980–81). Questions of validity and drawing conclusions from simulation studies in procedural justice.Law Soc. Rev. 15: 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Howard, E., and Lamm, H. (1986). Procedural and distributive justice: Definitions and beliefs of West German university students. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.

  • Barrett-Howard, E., and Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 296–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swiddler, A., and Tipton, S. M. (1985).Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1985). The influence of a leader's concerns for task, teamwork, and fairness on subordinates satisfaction and organizational evaluations. Unpublished manuscript, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

  • Bies, R. J. (1986). Identifying principles of interactional justice: The case of corporate recruiting. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management meetings. Chicago, IL.

  • Bies, R. J. (in press). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

  • Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. M., and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M., and Goldberg, S. B. (1983). Grievance mediation in the coal industry: A field experiment.Ind. Labor Rel. Rev. 37: 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1984). Procedural justice and participation.Hum. Rel. 38: 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1986). Justice and power in intergroup relations. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. (1986). Concluding remarks. International Conference on Social Justice in Human Relations, Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Psychol. Rev. 83: 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damaska, M. (1975). Presentation of evidence and factfinding precision.Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 123: 1083–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (1980). Group decision and procedural justice. In Fishbein, M. (ed.),Advances in Social Psychology Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as a basis for distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31: 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective Yale, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, P. C. (1984). Informational mechanisms of participation influencing goal acceptance, satisfaction, and performance. Unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, P. C., and Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: Control-mediated effects of voice in procedural and task decisions. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Management and Policy, University of Arizona.

  • Folger, R., and Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K. M., and Ferris, G. R. (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., and Martin, C. (in press). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.

  • Goldberg, S. B., Green, E. D., and Sander, F. E.A. (1985).Dispute Resolution Little, Brown, and Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisals.Soc. Justice Res. 1(2).

  • Greenberg, J. (in press). Reactions to procedural justice in payment distributions.J. Appl. Psychol.

  • Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (ed.),Basic Group Processes Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., and Tyler, T. R. (1987). Why study procedural justice in organizations?Soc. Justice Rev. 1(2).

  • Hardin, R. (1982).Collective Action Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1986). Concluding remarks. International Conference on Social Justice in Human Relations, Leiden, The Netherlands.

  • Hastie, R., Penrod, S., and Pennington, N. (1983).Inside the Jury Harvard, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, R. M., and Anderson, J. K. (1979). On the evaluation of procedural issues in laboratory experiments.Law Hum. Behav. 3: 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, L., and Penrod, S. (1986). Procedural preference as a function of conflict intensity.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 700–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlden, P. (1980–81). Impact of procedural modifications on evaluations of plea bargaining.Law Soc. Rev. 15: 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlden, P., LaTour, S., Walker, L., and Thibaut, J. (1978). Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 14: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. F. (1986).The Impact of Social Psychology on Procedural Justice C. C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtines, W. M. (1986). Moral behavior as rule governed behavior: Person and situation effects on moral decision making.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 784–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (1986a). Procedural justice: How one is treated vs. what one gets. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, Yale University.

  • Lane, R. E. (1986b). Market justice, political justice.Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 80: 383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, M. (1981).The Politics of Private Desires Penguin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. (1982). The justice motive in human relations and the economic model of man: A radical analysis of facts and fictions. In Derlega, V. J., and Grzelak, J. (eds.),Cooperation and Helping Behavior Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M., and Whitehead, L. A. (1980). Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory, In Mikula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J., Spence, J. T., and Carson, R. C. (eds.),Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K. J. Greenberg, M. S., and Willis, R. H. (eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., and White, R. K. (1959). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.”J. Soc. Psychol. 10: 271–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (1982). The psychology of courtroom procedure. In Kerr, N. L., and Bray, R. M. (eds.),The Psychology of the Courtroom Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (1986a).The Court-Annexed Arbitration Program in North Carolina Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (1986b). A dilemma in procedural justice: The apparent tradeoff between fairness and accuracy. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Lind, E. A., and Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 21: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (in press).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.

  • Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., and Thibaut, J. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39: 643–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., and Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 4: 338–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissak, R. I., and Sheppard, B. H. (1983). Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute intervention.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 13: 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun, R., and Tyler, T. R. (1986). Citizens' attitudes toward the jury system: Accuracy, fairness and efficiency. Paper presented at the Law and Society Meetings. Chicago.

  • Martin, J. (1986). Revolutionary visions of justice. Paper presented at the Conference on Social Dilemmas and Collective Action, Nag's Head, NC.

  • McEwen, C. A., and Maiman, R. J. (1981). Small claims mediation in Maine: An empirical assessment.Maine Law Rev. 33: 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, C. A., and Maiman, R. J. (1984). Mediation in small claims court: Achieving compliance through consent.Law Soc. Rev. 18: 11–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R., and Rossi, A. S. (1957). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In Merton, R. (ed.),Social Theory and Social Structure Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1986). Concluding remarks. International Conference on Social Justice in Human Relations, Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Barr, W. M., and Conley, J. M. (1985). Litigant satisfaction versus adequacy in small claims court narratives.Law Soc. Rev. 19: 661–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. (1975).Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff Brookings, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opinion Roundup: The Courts. (1982).Public Opinion, August/September, pp. 25–26.

  • Piaget, J. (1965).The Moral Judgment of the Child Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasinski, K. (1984). Outcomes, fairness, and values as predictors of political responses to government allocation policies and practices: A field study. Unpublished dissertation Northwestern University.

  • Rasinski, K., and Tyler, T. R. (1986). Predicting political behavior: The influence of self-interest, normative and symbolic concerns. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. D. (1978). Moral order and sociology of law: Trends, problems and prospects.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 4: 577–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H. (1984). Third-party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In Staw, B., and Cummings, L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior,, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H. (1985). Justice is not simple matter: The case for elaborating our model of procedural fairness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49: 953–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., and Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of manager fairness.Social Justice Rev. 1(2).

  • Sheppard, B. H., and Vidmar, N. (1980). Adversary pretrial procedures and testimonial evidence: Effects of lawyer's role and Machiavellianism.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39: 320–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., Saunders, D. M., and Minton, J. W. (1986). Procedural justice from the third party perspective. Unpublished manuscript, Fuqua Graduate School of Business, Duke University.

  • Silbey, S. S., and Merry, S. E. (1986). Mediator settlement strategies.Law and Policy 8: 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and Kelley, H. H. (1959).The Social Psychology of Groups Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure.Calif. Law Rev. 66: 451–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendent's evaluation of their court-room experience.Soc. Rev. 18: 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1986a). Justice and leadership endorsement. In Lau, R. R., and Sears, D. O. (eds.),Political Cognition Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1986b). What is procedural justice? Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.

  • Tyler, T. R. (1986c). When does justice matter in organizational settings? Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association. Chicago.

  • Tyler, T. R. (1986d). Using procedures to lessen tradeoffs in organizational decision-making. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Tyler, T. R. (1986e).Procedural justice in organizations. In Lewicki, R., Bazerman, M., and Sheppard, B. (eds.),Research on Negotiating in Organizations,, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1986f). Justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Paper presented at the Law and Society meetings, Chicago.

  • Tyler, T. R. (1986g). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52: 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41: 642–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters.Basic Appl. Psychol. 1: 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural processes and legal institutions. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Justice in Human Relations, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.

  • Tyler, T. R., and McGraw, K. (1986). Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence.J. Soc. Issues 42: 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., and McGraw, K. (1985a). The influence of perceived injustice on the endorsement of political leaders.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15: 700–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., and Spodick, N. (1985b). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48: 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., and Griffin, E. (1986). Alternative images of the citizen: Implications for public policy.Am. Psychol. 42: 970–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, N., and Laird, N. M. (1983). Adversary social roles: Their effects on witnesses' communication of evidence and the assessments of adjudicators.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 888–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., and Lind, E. A. (1984). Psychological studies of procedural justice. In Stephenson, G. M., and Davis, J. H. (eds.),Progress in Applied Social Psychology,, Wiley, New York, pp. 293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983).Spheres of Justice Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Psychology and Political Science, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University, Kresge Centennial Hall, 60201, Evanston, Illinois

    Tom R. Tyler

Authors
  1. Tom R. Tyler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tyler, T.R. Procedural justice research. Soc Just Res 1, 41–65 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049383

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049383

Key words

Search

Navigation