Abstract
The problems associated with the concept of the core in spatial voting games such as non-existence and instability are well documented. The structurally stable core, presented by Schofield, attempts to resolve these problems by looking at the subset of the core which is still nonempty after a small change in voter preferences. Although this concept, combined with the adoption of supramajoritarian voting rules and weighted voting games, may very well explain the observed stability in reality, it may not be suitable for certain coalition situations. This article proposes a new solution concept, the strongly stable core. The conditions for the existence and the potential location of the strongly stable core are then explored and compared with those of the structurally stable core.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black, D. (1958).The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeMarzo, P. (1988).Majority voting and corporate control: The rule of the dominant shareholder. Technical report no. 517, Institute for mathematical studies in the social science, Stanford University.
Grofman, B. and Uhlaner, C. (1985). Meta-preferences and the reasons for stability in social choice: Thoughts on broadening and clarifying the debate.Theory and Decision 19: 31–50.
Kim, H. (1993). The strongly stable core under the supramajority rule. Unpublished manuscript.
Kramer, G.H. (1977). A dynamical model of political equilibrium.Journal of Economic Theory 16: 310–334.
Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1990).Multiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McKelvey, R.D. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control.Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–482.
McKelvey, R.D. and Schofield, N. (1986). Structural instability of the core.Journal of Mathematical Economics 15: 179–198.
McKelvey, R.D. and Schofield, N. (1987). Generalized symmetry conditions at a core point.Econometrica 55: 923–933.
Nakamura, K. (1978). The vetoers in a simple game with ordinal preferences.International Journal of Game Theory 8: 55–61.
Plott, C.R. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule.The American Economic Review 57: 787–806.
Riker, W.H. (1962).The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schofield, N. (1980). Generic properties of simple Bergson-Samuelson welfare functions.Journal of Mathematical Economics 7: 175–192.
Schofield, N. (1983). Equilibria in simple dynamic games. In P.K. Pattanaik and M. Salles (Eds.),Social choice and welfare. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schofield, N. (1985).Social choice and democracy. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Schofield, N. (1986). Existence of a “structurally stable” equilibrium for a non-collegial voting rule.Public Choice 51: 267–284.
Schofield, N. (1987). Stability of coalition governments in Western Europe: 1945–1986.European Journal of Political Economy 3: 555–591.
Schofield, N. (1989). Strategy of party competition. Unpublished manuscript.
Schofield, N., Grofman, B. and Feld, S.L. (1988). The core and the stability of group choice in spatial voting games.American Political Science Review 82: 195–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am grateful to Jong-Guk Bak, Randy Calvert, Cheryl Eavey, Patrick James, Paul E. Johnson, Glenn Parker, and Dale Smith for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I thank Norman Schofield for clarifying some of the technical details of the structurally stable core for me and for providing a copy of his unpublished manuscript,Strategy of Party Competition. I also thank David Austen-Smith for bringing DeMarzo's work to my attention. Of course, any remaining errors are mine. This research was supported, in part, by the Florida State University's Council on Research and Creativity First-Year Assistant Professor Research Grant in 1992.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H. The strongly stable core in weighted voting games. Public Choice 84, 77–90 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047802
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047802