Skip to main content
Log in

An assessment of the radiological module of NEONATE as an aid in interpreting chest X-ray findings by nonradiologists

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

NEONATE is a prototype of an expert system for the Newborn Intensive Care Unit developed at the Primary Children's Medical Center in Salt Lake City, Utah. A pilot study was undertaken to see if the addition of radiological frames to the NEONATE software could aid attending Neonatologists to interpret chest X-ray films. A set of radiological frames was created from rules generated by a radiologist. The performance of these radiological frames was compared to the performance of other radiologists using the Kappa statistic to measure agreement. There is a good agreement between the computer's decisions and the radiologists' decisions. The radiological frames were also tested to see if they help physicians who are not trained in radiology. A system that compares the residents' interpretation and the computer's interpretation to a gold standard interpretation was developed. It shows that the computer helps the first and second year residents, but not the third year residents. This article suggests that NEONATE's interpretation of chest X-ray findings are close to the radiologists' interpretations. While NEONATE's radiological frames help novice physicians in reaching better chest X-ray interpretation, the current study suggests that they are not likely to help a Neonatologist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warner, H.R., Olmsted, C.M., and Rutherford, B.D., HELP—A Program for Medical Decision-Making,Comput. Biomed. Res. 1972, 5:65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pryor, T.A., Gardner, R.M., Clayton, P.D., and Warner, H.R., The HELP System.J. Med. Sys. 1983, 7(2):87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pryor, T.A., The HELP Medical Record System.MD Comput. 1988, 5(5):22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Janik, D.S., Swarner, O.W., Henriksen, K.M., and Wyman, M.L., A computerized single entry system for recording and reporting data on high-risk newborn infants.J. Pediatr. 1978, 93:519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Janik, D.S., Swarner, O.W., Henriksen, K.M., and Wyman, M.L., Computerized newborn intensive care data recording and reporting II: An online system.J. Pediatr. 1979, 94:326–330.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janik, D.S., Sharp, E.M., Forbush, L., Wyman, M.L., and Jung, A.L., Computerized newborn intensive care data recording, reporting and research III: A practical microcomputer system.J. Pediatr. 1980, 97:497–500.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Franco, A., Farr, F.L., King, J.D., Clark, J.S., and Haug, P.J., NEONATE—An expert application for the HELP system: Comparison of the computer's and the physician's problem list.J. Med. Sys. 1990, 14(5):297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spitzer, R.I., Cohen, J., Fleiss, J.I., and Endicott, J., Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 1967, 17:81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fleiss, J.I., Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychol. Bull. 1971, 76(3):378–382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franco, A., King, J.D., Farr, F.L. et al. An assessment of the radiological module of NEONATE as an aid in interpreting chest X-ray findings by nonradiologists. J Med Syst 15, 277–286 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999165

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999165

Keywords

Navigation